Ramsey Ghaleb BA , Ahmed B. Sallam MD, PhD , Florin Grigorian MD , Paul H. Phillips MD , Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny MD, MSc
{"title":"口腔荧光素血管造影在儿童眼科中的应用。","authors":"Ramsey Ghaleb BA , Ahmed B. Sallam MD, PhD , Florin Grigorian MD , Paul H. Phillips MD , Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We evaluate the administration protocols, diagnostic utility, and safety of oral fluorescein angiography (OFA) in pediatric ophthalmological diseases, with a secondary objective of comparing OFA to intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) in terms of image quality and clinical utility. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on studies involving pediatric patients. Fifteen studies were included, with 11 assessing the utility and safety of OFA and 4 comparing it to IVFA. These studies covered 581 eyes from 464 patients. The most common dosing protocol for OFA involved 25 mg/kg of 10 % fluorescein dye, with various dilution solutions and fasting requirements enhancing image quality. Adverse effects were minimal, with mild reactions such as itching or nausea observed in 0.019 % of patients. OFA demonstrated good diagnostic value across various pathologies, including retinal vasculopathies, uveitis, disc edema, and Coats disease. OFA is a feasible imaging modality that is a less invasive and better-tolerated alternative to IVFA in the pediatric population, providing high-quality diagnostic images with fewer adverse effects. Our review highlights the need for standardized administration protocols and further research into optimizing dosing and ingestion techniques to enhance image quality and diagnostic utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":"70 5","pages":"Pages 849-858"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral fluorescein angiography in pediatric ophthalmology\",\"authors\":\"Ramsey Ghaleb BA , Ahmed B. Sallam MD, PhD , Florin Grigorian MD , Paul H. Phillips MD , Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We evaluate the administration protocols, diagnostic utility, and safety of oral fluorescein angiography (OFA) in pediatric ophthalmological diseases, with a secondary objective of comparing OFA to intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) in terms of image quality and clinical utility. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on studies involving pediatric patients. Fifteen studies were included, with 11 assessing the utility and safety of OFA and 4 comparing it to IVFA. These studies covered 581 eyes from 464 patients. The most common dosing protocol for OFA involved 25 mg/kg of 10 % fluorescein dye, with various dilution solutions and fasting requirements enhancing image quality. Adverse effects were minimal, with mild reactions such as itching or nausea observed in 0.019 % of patients. OFA demonstrated good diagnostic value across various pathologies, including retinal vasculopathies, uveitis, disc edema, and Coats disease. OFA is a feasible imaging modality that is a less invasive and better-tolerated alternative to IVFA in the pediatric population, providing high-quality diagnostic images with fewer adverse effects. Our review highlights the need for standardized administration protocols and further research into optimizing dosing and ingestion techniques to enhance image quality and diagnostic utility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"70 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 849-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000517\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们评估了口服荧光素血管造影(OFA)在儿童眼科疾病中的给药方案、诊断效用和安全性,并在图像质量和临床效用方面比较OFA和静脉荧光素血管造影(IVFA)。对PubMed, Embase和Web of Science进行了全面的搜索,重点是涉及儿科患者的研究。纳入了15项研究,其中11项评估OFA的效用和安全性,4项将其与IVFA进行比较。这些研究涵盖了464名患者的581只眼睛。OFA最常见的给药方案是10%荧光素染料25mg /kg,使用各种稀释溶液和禁食要求来增强图像质量。不良反应很小,0.019%的患者出现瘙痒或恶心等轻微反应。OFA在多种病理中表现出良好的诊断价值,包括视网膜血管病变、葡萄膜炎、椎间盘水肿和Coats病。OFA是一种可行的成像方式,在儿科人群中是一种侵入性较小、耐受性更好的IVFA替代方案,提供高质量的诊断图像,不良反应更少。我们的综述强调需要标准化的给药方案和进一步研究优化剂量和摄入技术,以提高图像质量和诊断效用。
Oral fluorescein angiography in pediatric ophthalmology
We evaluate the administration protocols, diagnostic utility, and safety of oral fluorescein angiography (OFA) in pediatric ophthalmological diseases, with a secondary objective of comparing OFA to intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) in terms of image quality and clinical utility. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on studies involving pediatric patients. Fifteen studies were included, with 11 assessing the utility and safety of OFA and 4 comparing it to IVFA. These studies covered 581 eyes from 464 patients. The most common dosing protocol for OFA involved 25 mg/kg of 10 % fluorescein dye, with various dilution solutions and fasting requirements enhancing image quality. Adverse effects were minimal, with mild reactions such as itching or nausea observed in 0.019 % of patients. OFA demonstrated good diagnostic value across various pathologies, including retinal vasculopathies, uveitis, disc edema, and Coats disease. OFA is a feasible imaging modality that is a less invasive and better-tolerated alternative to IVFA in the pediatric population, providing high-quality diagnostic images with fewer adverse effects. Our review highlights the need for standardized administration protocols and further research into optimizing dosing and ingestion techniques to enhance image quality and diagnostic utility.
期刊介绍:
Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.