一种新的混合图像去噪算法,使用自适应和改进的决策滤波器来提高图像质量。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Faiz Ullah, Kamlesh Kumar, Tariq Rahim, Jawad Khan, Younhyun Jung
{"title":"一种新的混合图像去噪算法,使用自适应和改进的决策滤波器来提高图像质量。","authors":"Faiz Ullah, Kamlesh Kumar, Tariq Rahim, Jawad Khan, Younhyun Jung","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92283-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Denoising is one of the most important processes in digital image processing to recover visual quality and structural integrity in images. Traditional methods often suffer from limitations like computational complexity, over-smoothing, and the inability to preserve critical details, particularly edges. This paper introduces a hybrid denoising algorithm combining Adaptive Median Filter (AMF) and Modified Decision-Based Median Filter (MDBMF) to address these challenges. The AMF adjusts the window sizes dynamically to precisely detect noisy pixels, and MDBMF selectively recovers corrupted pixels without affecting intact regions, effectively reducing noise while preserving edges. The subjective analysis is supplemented with objective analyses in which visual quality proves that hybrid approach performance considerably outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The test is conducted on nine benchmark images standard and medical dataset, namely, Chest and Liver images with different noise densities in the range from 10 to 90%. Quantitative evaluations PSNR, MSE, IEF, SSIM, FOM and VIF clearly show the performance superiority of the hybrid approach when compared to the state-of-the-art approaches. The improvement in PSNR was up to 2.34 dB, IEF improvement was more than 20%, and the improvement in MSE was up to 15% improvement over other methods like BPDF, AT2FF, and SVMMF. Improvement in the values of SSIM is up to 0.07, which confirms improved structural similarity. Furthermore, the FOM and VIF metrics demonstrate the remarkable performance of the hybrid approach: both the FOM and VIF exceeded all other denoising techniques evaluated, reaching 0.68 and 0.61, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new hybrid image denoising algorithm using adaptive and modified decision-based filters for enhanced image quality.\",\"authors\":\"Faiz Ullah, Kamlesh Kumar, Tariq Rahim, Jawad Khan, Younhyun Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-92283-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Denoising is one of the most important processes in digital image processing to recover visual quality and structural integrity in images. Traditional methods often suffer from limitations like computational complexity, over-smoothing, and the inability to preserve critical details, particularly edges. This paper introduces a hybrid denoising algorithm combining Adaptive Median Filter (AMF) and Modified Decision-Based Median Filter (MDBMF) to address these challenges. The AMF adjusts the window sizes dynamically to precisely detect noisy pixels, and MDBMF selectively recovers corrupted pixels without affecting intact regions, effectively reducing noise while preserving edges. The subjective analysis is supplemented with objective analyses in which visual quality proves that hybrid approach performance considerably outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The test is conducted on nine benchmark images standard and medical dataset, namely, Chest and Liver images with different noise densities in the range from 10 to 90%. Quantitative evaluations PSNR, MSE, IEF, SSIM, FOM and VIF clearly show the performance superiority of the hybrid approach when compared to the state-of-the-art approaches. The improvement in PSNR was up to 2.34 dB, IEF improvement was more than 20%, and the improvement in MSE was up to 15% improvement over other methods like BPDF, AT2FF, and SVMMF. Improvement in the values of SSIM is up to 0.07, which confirms improved structural similarity. Furthermore, the FOM and VIF metrics demonstrate the remarkable performance of the hybrid approach: both the FOM and VIF exceeded all other denoising techniques evaluated, reaching 0.68 and 0.61, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92283-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92283-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在数字图像处理中,去噪是恢复图像视觉质量和结构完整性的重要步骤之一。传统方法经常受到计算复杂性、过度平滑和无法保留关键细节(特别是边缘)等限制的影响。本文提出了一种结合自适应中值滤波器(AMF)和改进决策中值滤波器(MDBMF)的混合去噪算法来解决这些问题。AMF动态调整窗口大小以精确检测噪声像素,MDBMF在不影响完整区域的情况下选择性地恢复损坏像素,有效地降低了噪声,同时保留了边缘。主观分析辅以客观分析,其中视觉质量证明混合方法的性能大大优于现有的最先进的方法。测试在9个基准图像标准和医学数据集上进行,即胸部和肝脏图像,噪声密度在10%到90%之间。定量评估PSNR、MSE、IEF、SSIM、FOM和VIF清楚地表明,与最先进的方法相比,混合方法具有性能优势。与BPDF、AT2FF、SVMMF等方法相比,PSNR提高了2.34 dB, IEF提高了20%以上,MSE提高了15%以上。SSIM值的改善达0.07,证实了结构相似性的改善。此外,FOM和VIF指标显示了混合方法的显着性能:FOM和VIF都超过了所有其他评估的去噪技术,分别达到0.68和0.61。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new hybrid image denoising algorithm using adaptive and modified decision-based filters for enhanced image quality.

Denoising is one of the most important processes in digital image processing to recover visual quality and structural integrity in images. Traditional methods often suffer from limitations like computational complexity, over-smoothing, and the inability to preserve critical details, particularly edges. This paper introduces a hybrid denoising algorithm combining Adaptive Median Filter (AMF) and Modified Decision-Based Median Filter (MDBMF) to address these challenges. The AMF adjusts the window sizes dynamically to precisely detect noisy pixels, and MDBMF selectively recovers corrupted pixels without affecting intact regions, effectively reducing noise while preserving edges. The subjective analysis is supplemented with objective analyses in which visual quality proves that hybrid approach performance considerably outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The test is conducted on nine benchmark images standard and medical dataset, namely, Chest and Liver images with different noise densities in the range from 10 to 90%. Quantitative evaluations PSNR, MSE, IEF, SSIM, FOM and VIF clearly show the performance superiority of the hybrid approach when compared to the state-of-the-art approaches. The improvement in PSNR was up to 2.34 dB, IEF improvement was more than 20%, and the improvement in MSE was up to 15% improvement over other methods like BPDF, AT2FF, and SVMMF. Improvement in the values of SSIM is up to 0.07, which confirms improved structural similarity. Furthermore, the FOM and VIF metrics demonstrate the remarkable performance of the hybrid approach: both the FOM and VIF exceeded all other denoising techniques evaluated, reaching 0.68 and 0.61, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信