实际和感知运动技能能力强的儿童更喜欢运动:对横截面数据的潜在特征分析。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
L M Barnett, S J J M Verswijveren, N D Ridgers, M Tietjens, N J Lander, G Abbott
{"title":"实际和感知运动技能能力强的儿童更喜欢运动:对横截面数据的潜在特征分析。","authors":"L M Barnett, S J J M Verswijveren, N D Ridgers, M Tietjens, N J Lander, G Abbott","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2477419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to determine profiles according to actual and perceived motor competence and provide a comparison of profiles according to moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) in children. Cross-sectional data were pooled from four Australian studies (481 children, 54.5% boys; 3.5 to 11.7 years). Motor skill competence, total, object control and locomotor (Test of Gross Motor Skill Development [TGMD)]), perceived motor skill (pictorial scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence [PMSC]) and MVPA (ActiGraph data) were assessed. Latent profile analyses identified actual and perceived skill profiles and covariate-adjusted associations with MVPA were then assessed for all children, for boys and girls. For total skills, the two-profile solution was the best fit for all children (81% '<i>high aligned</i>', i.e., high perception, high skills; 19% '<i>low aligned</i>, i.e., low perception, low skills') and for girls (71% '<i>high aligned</i>'; 29% '<i>low aligned</i>'). For boys, a three-profile solution was the best fit (49% '<i>under perceiver</i>'- low perception, high skills; 42% '<i>over perceiver</i>' - high perception, low skills; 9% '<i>low aligned</i>'). For the total skill, children in the '<i>high aligned</i>' profile (65.3 minutes) were 14.6 minutes/day more active than the \"low aligned\" profile (50.8 minutes). Intervention efforts should focus on the \"<i>low aligned</i>\" profile to increase physical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children with high actual and perceived motor skill competence are more physically active: A pooled latent profile analysis of cross-sectional data.\",\"authors\":\"L M Barnett, S J J M Verswijveren, N D Ridgers, M Tietjens, N J Lander, G Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2477419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim was to determine profiles according to actual and perceived motor competence and provide a comparison of profiles according to moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) in children. Cross-sectional data were pooled from four Australian studies (481 children, 54.5% boys; 3.5 to 11.7 years). Motor skill competence, total, object control and locomotor (Test of Gross Motor Skill Development [TGMD)]), perceived motor skill (pictorial scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence [PMSC]) and MVPA (ActiGraph data) were assessed. Latent profile analyses identified actual and perceived skill profiles and covariate-adjusted associations with MVPA were then assessed for all children, for boys and girls. For total skills, the two-profile solution was the best fit for all children (81% '<i>high aligned</i>', i.e., high perception, high skills; 19% '<i>low aligned</i>, i.e., low perception, low skills') and for girls (71% '<i>high aligned</i>'; 29% '<i>low aligned</i>'). For boys, a three-profile solution was the best fit (49% '<i>under perceiver</i>'- low perception, high skills; 42% '<i>over perceiver</i>' - high perception, low skills; 9% '<i>low aligned</i>'). For the total skill, children in the '<i>high aligned</i>' profile (65.3 minutes) were 14.6 minutes/day more active than the \\\"low aligned\\\" profile (50.8 minutes). Intervention efforts should focus on the \\\"<i>low aligned</i>\\\" profile to increase physical activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2477419\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2477419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是根据实际和感知的运动能力确定概况,并根据儿童中强度到高强度的身体活动(MVPA)提供概况的比较。横断面数据来自澳大利亚的四项研究(481名儿童,54.5%的男孩;3.5至11.7年)。对运动技能能力、总体、物体控制和运动能力(大运动技能发展测试[TGMD])、感知运动技能(感知运动技能能力图像量表[PMSC])和MVPA (ActiGraph数据)进行评估。潜在特征分析确定了实际和感知技能特征,然后评估了所有儿童(男孩和女孩)与MVPA的协变量调整关联。就总技能而言,双轮廓解决方案最适合所有儿童(81%的儿童“高度一致”,即高感知、高技能;19%为“低一致性,即低认知,低技能”),女孩为(71%为“高一致性”;29%“低对齐”)。对于男孩来说,三种形象的解决方案是最合适的(49%的人“感知能力不足”——低感知能力,高技能;42%的“过度感知者”——高感知,低技能;9%“低对齐”)。就总技能而言,“高对齐”组的儿童(65.3分钟)比“低对齐”组的儿童(50.8分钟)每天多活动14.6分钟。干预措施应侧重于“低对齐”姿态,以增加身体活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children with high actual and perceived motor skill competence are more physically active: A pooled latent profile analysis of cross-sectional data.

The aim was to determine profiles according to actual and perceived motor competence and provide a comparison of profiles according to moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) in children. Cross-sectional data were pooled from four Australian studies (481 children, 54.5% boys; 3.5 to 11.7 years). Motor skill competence, total, object control and locomotor (Test of Gross Motor Skill Development [TGMD)]), perceived motor skill (pictorial scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence [PMSC]) and MVPA (ActiGraph data) were assessed. Latent profile analyses identified actual and perceived skill profiles and covariate-adjusted associations with MVPA were then assessed for all children, for boys and girls. For total skills, the two-profile solution was the best fit for all children (81% 'high aligned', i.e., high perception, high skills; 19% 'low aligned, i.e., low perception, low skills') and for girls (71% 'high aligned'; 29% 'low aligned'). For boys, a three-profile solution was the best fit (49% 'under perceiver'- low perception, high skills; 42% 'over perceiver' - high perception, low skills; 9% 'low aligned'). For the total skill, children in the 'high aligned' profile (65.3 minutes) were 14.6 minutes/day more active than the "low aligned" profile (50.8 minutes). Intervention efforts should focus on the "low aligned" profile to increase physical activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信