治疗下颌下涎石症:钬激光和气压碎石技术的前瞻性对照试验研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Necdet Özçelik, Husam Vehbi, Elvin Alaskarov
{"title":"治疗下颌下涎石症:钬激光和气压碎石技术的前瞻性对照试验研究。","authors":"Necdet Özçelik, Husam Vehbi, Elvin Alaskarov","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09309-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sialendoscopy is a minimally invasive technique employed to diagnose and treat obstructions in the major salivary glands.Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy (HLL) and Intraductal Pneumatic Lithotripsy (IPL) are increasingly utilized for stone fragmentation; however, comparative studies are still limited. This study aims to prospectively compare the outcomes of HLL and IPL in cases of submandibular sialolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty patients diagnosed with submandibular sialolithiasis were randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with either HLL or IPL. Demographics, stone size and location, operative times, and complications were meticulously documented. Preoperative imaging with ultrasound and computed tomography identified stone parameters. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment, which included a 3-month ultrasound to evaluate for residual stones and assess ductal evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences between the groups concerning demographics, stone size, or location (p > 0.05). However, the IPL group demonstrated shorter operative times for distal and mid-duct stones (p < 0.05). The stone-free rates were 92% in the HLL group and 96% in the IPL group. The HLL group exhibited higher rates of mucosal laceration and ductal perforation, while the IPL group showed a greater potential for stone migration. Postoperative symptom resolution was achieved in both groups. Additionally, quality of life (QOL) scores, assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively in both groups, with no statistically significant differences between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both HLL and IPL are effective treatments for submandibular sialolithiasis. IPL is associated with shorter operative times, especially for distal and mid-duct stones, while the complication rates for both methods remain within acceptable limits.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"3689-3697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Submandibular sialolithiasis treatment: a comparative pilot prospective study of holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Necdet Özçelik, Husam Vehbi, Elvin Alaskarov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09309-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sialendoscopy is a minimally invasive technique employed to diagnose and treat obstructions in the major salivary glands.Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy (HLL) and Intraductal Pneumatic Lithotripsy (IPL) are increasingly utilized for stone fragmentation; however, comparative studies are still limited. This study aims to prospectively compare the outcomes of HLL and IPL in cases of submandibular sialolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty patients diagnosed with submandibular sialolithiasis were randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with either HLL or IPL. Demographics, stone size and location, operative times, and complications were meticulously documented. Preoperative imaging with ultrasound and computed tomography identified stone parameters. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment, which included a 3-month ultrasound to evaluate for residual stones and assess ductal evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences between the groups concerning demographics, stone size, or location (p > 0.05). However, the IPL group demonstrated shorter operative times for distal and mid-duct stones (p < 0.05). The stone-free rates were 92% in the HLL group and 96% in the IPL group. The HLL group exhibited higher rates of mucosal laceration and ductal perforation, while the IPL group showed a greater potential for stone migration. Postoperative symptom resolution was achieved in both groups. Additionally, quality of life (QOL) scores, assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively in both groups, with no statistically significant differences between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both HLL and IPL are effective treatments for submandibular sialolithiasis. IPL is associated with shorter operative times, especially for distal and mid-duct stones, while the complication rates for both methods remain within acceptable limits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3689-3697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321920/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09309-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09309-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:涎镜检查是一种用于诊断和治疗大唾液腺梗阻的微创技术。钬激光碎石术(HLL)和导管内气动碎石术(IPL)越来越多地用于碎石;然而,比较研究仍然有限。本研究旨在前瞻性比较HLL和IPL治疗颌下腺结石的效果。材料和方法:50例诊断为下颌下涎石症的患者随机分为两组,分别接受HLL或IPL治疗。人口统计、结石大小和位置、手术时间和并发症均被详细记录。术前超声和计算机断层扫描确定结石参数。随访评估分别在治疗后1周、3个月和6个月进行,其中包括3个月的超声检查以评估残留结石和评估导管的评估。结果:两组在人口统计学、结石大小或位置方面无显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,IPL组对远端和中端胆管结石的手术时间较短(p结论:HLL和IPL都是治疗下颌下涎石症的有效方法。IPL与较短的手术时间相关,特别是对于远端和中端胆管结石,而两种方法的并发症发生率仍在可接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Submandibular sialolithiasis treatment: a comparative pilot prospective study of holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques.

Submandibular sialolithiasis treatment: a comparative pilot prospective study of holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques.

Submandibular sialolithiasis treatment: a comparative pilot prospective study of holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques.

Submandibular sialolithiasis treatment: a comparative pilot prospective study of holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques.

Objective: Sialendoscopy is a minimally invasive technique employed to diagnose and treat obstructions in the major salivary glands.Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy (HLL) and Intraductal Pneumatic Lithotripsy (IPL) are increasingly utilized for stone fragmentation; however, comparative studies are still limited. This study aims to prospectively compare the outcomes of HLL and IPL in cases of submandibular sialolithiasis.

Materials and methods: Fifty patients diagnosed with submandibular sialolithiasis were randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with either HLL or IPL. Demographics, stone size and location, operative times, and complications were meticulously documented. Preoperative imaging with ultrasound and computed tomography identified stone parameters. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment, which included a 3-month ultrasound to evaluate for residual stones and assess ductal evaluation.

Results: No significant differences between the groups concerning demographics, stone size, or location (p > 0.05). However, the IPL group demonstrated shorter operative times for distal and mid-duct stones (p < 0.05). The stone-free rates were 92% in the HLL group and 96% in the IPL group. The HLL group exhibited higher rates of mucosal laceration and ductal perforation, while the IPL group showed a greater potential for stone migration. Postoperative symptom resolution was achieved in both groups. Additionally, quality of life (QOL) scores, assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively in both groups, with no statistically significant differences between them.

Conclusion: Both HLL and IPL are effective treatments for submandibular sialolithiasis. IPL is associated with shorter operative times, especially for distal and mid-duct stones, while the complication rates for both methods remain within acceptable limits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信