红细胞的聚集和分解:消耗与桥接。

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Biophysical journal Pub Date : 2025-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007
Nicolas Moreno, Kirill Korneev, Alexey Semenov, Alper Topuz, Thomas John, Minne Paul Lettinga, Marco Ellero, Christian Wagner, Dmitry A Fedosov
{"title":"红细胞的聚集和分解:消耗与桥接。","authors":"Nicolas Moreno, Kirill Korneev, Alexey Semenov, Alper Topuz, Thomas John, Minne Paul Lettinga, Marco Ellero, Christian Wagner, Dmitry A Fedosov","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aggregation of red blood cells (RBCs) is a complex phenomenon that strongly impacts blood flow and tissue perfusion. Despite extensive research for more than 50 years, physical mechanisms that govern RBC aggregation are still under debate. Two proposed mechanisms are based on bridging and depletion interactions between RBCs due to the presence of macromolecules in blood plasma. The bridging hypothesis assumes the formation of bonds between RBCs through adsorbing macromolecules, while the depletion mechanism results from the exclusion of macromolecules from the intercellular space, leading to effective attraction. Existing experimental studies generally cannot differentiate between these two aggregation mechanisms, although several recent investigations suggest concurrent involvement of the both mechanisms. We explore dynamic aggregation and disaggregation of two RBCs using three simulation models: a potential-based model mimicking depletion interactions, a bridging model with immobile bonds, and a new bridging model with mobile bonds that can slide along RBC membranes. Simulation results indicate that dynamic aggregation of RBCs primarily arises from depletion interactions, while disaggregation of RBCs involves both mechanisms. The bridging model with mobile bonds reproduces well the corresponding experimental data, offering insights into the interplay between bridging and depletion interactions and providing a framework for studying similar interactions between other biological cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":"1285-1297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggregation and disaggregation of red blood cells: Depletion versus bridging.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Moreno, Kirill Korneev, Alexey Semenov, Alper Topuz, Thomas John, Minne Paul Lettinga, Marco Ellero, Christian Wagner, Dmitry A Fedosov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aggregation of red blood cells (RBCs) is a complex phenomenon that strongly impacts blood flow and tissue perfusion. Despite extensive research for more than 50 years, physical mechanisms that govern RBC aggregation are still under debate. Two proposed mechanisms are based on bridging and depletion interactions between RBCs due to the presence of macromolecules in blood plasma. The bridging hypothesis assumes the formation of bonds between RBCs through adsorbing macromolecules, while the depletion mechanism results from the exclusion of macromolecules from the intercellular space, leading to effective attraction. Existing experimental studies generally cannot differentiate between these two aggregation mechanisms, although several recent investigations suggest concurrent involvement of the both mechanisms. We explore dynamic aggregation and disaggregation of two RBCs using three simulation models: a potential-based model mimicking depletion interactions, a bridging model with immobile bonds, and a new bridging model with mobile bonds that can slide along RBC membranes. Simulation results indicate that dynamic aggregation of RBCs primarily arises from depletion interactions, while disaggregation of RBCs involves both mechanisms. The bridging model with mobile bonds reproduces well the corresponding experimental data, offering insights into the interplay between bridging and depletion interactions and providing a framework for studying similar interactions between other biological cells.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1285-1297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biophysical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

红细胞的聚集是一种复杂的现象,它强烈地影响着血液流动和组织灌注。尽管有超过50年的广泛研究,支配RBC聚集的物理机制仍在争论中。两种被提出的机制是基于桥接和消耗红细胞之间的相互作用,由于血浆中大分子的存在。桥接假说认为红细胞之间通过吸附大分子形成键,而损耗机制是由于大分子被排除在细胞间空间之外,从而导致有效的吸引。现有的实验研究一般不能区分这两种聚集机制,尽管最近的一些研究表明这两种机制同时参与。我们使用三种模拟模型探讨了两种红细胞的动态聚集和分解:一种基于电位的模拟耗尽相互作用的模型,一种具有固定键的桥接模型,以及一种具有可以沿着红细胞膜滑动的移动键的新桥接模型。模拟结果表明,红细胞的动态聚集主要源于消耗相互作用,而红细胞的分解涉及这两种机制。具有移动键的桥接模型很好地再现了相应的实验数据,为桥接和耗尽相互作用之间的相互作用提供了见解,并为研究其他生物细胞之间的类似相互作用提供了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aggregation and disaggregation of red blood cells: Depletion versus bridging.

The aggregation of red blood cells (RBCs) is a complex phenomenon that strongly impacts blood flow and tissue perfusion. Despite extensive research for more than 50 years, physical mechanisms that govern RBC aggregation are still under debate. Two proposed mechanisms are based on bridging and depletion interactions between RBCs due to the presence of macromolecules in blood plasma. The bridging hypothesis assumes the formation of bonds between RBCs through adsorbing macromolecules, while the depletion mechanism results from the exclusion of macromolecules from the intercellular space, leading to effective attraction. Existing experimental studies generally cannot differentiate between these two aggregation mechanisms, although several recent investigations suggest concurrent involvement of the both mechanisms. We explore dynamic aggregation and disaggregation of two RBCs using three simulation models: a potential-based model mimicking depletion interactions, a bridging model with immobile bonds, and a new bridging model with mobile bonds that can slide along RBC membranes. Simulation results indicate that dynamic aggregation of RBCs primarily arises from depletion interactions, while disaggregation of RBCs involves both mechanisms. The bridging model with mobile bonds reproduces well the corresponding experimental data, offering insights into the interplay between bridging and depletion interactions and providing a framework for studying similar interactions between other biological cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biophysical journal
Biophysical journal 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3090
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信