撕裂破裂时间试验中的混杂因素。顺序测量的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Yakup Acet, Yaşar Dağ
{"title":"撕裂破裂时间试验中的混杂因素。顺序测量的影响。","authors":"Yakup Acet, Yaşar Dağ","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2025.2475202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The tear break-up time (BUT) test is important in diagnosing and monitoring tear film stability, and understanding potential changes in tear film dynamics during repeated measurements could improve the accuracy and reliability of the test in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to examine the changes in BUT value caused by subsequent measurements made in BUT test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 female participants were divided into groups (30 individuals each). Participants were divided into four groups based on the interval between two non-invasive tear break-up time (NI-BUT) tests: Group 1 (1-minute interval), Group 5 (5-minute interval), Group 10 (10-minute interval), and Group 15 (15-minute interval). The first NI-BUT test was called Initial NI-BUT (NI-BUT<sub>(I)</sub>), and the second test was called Subsequent NI-BUT (NI-BUT<sub>(S)</sub>). The first BUTvalue (BUT<sub>1st</sub>), the second BUT value (BUT<sub>2nd</sub>), the third BUT value (BUT<sub>3rd</sub>), the fourth BUT value (BUT<sub>4th</sub>), the fifth BUT value (BUT<sub>5th</sub>), and the average value of the first three BUTs (BUT<sub>A3</sub>) were compared between the NI-BUT<sub>(1)</sub> and NI-BUT<sub>(S)</sub> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant ages ranged from 18 to 36 years, with a mean of 25.1 ± 3.2 years. The mean values of BUT<sub>1st</sub>, BUT2<sub>nd</sub>, BUT3<sub>rd</sub>, BUT4<sub>th</sub>, BUT5<sub>th</sub>, and BUT<sub>A3</sub> in the NI-BUT<sub>(I)</sub> test were statistically significantly shorter than those in the NI-BUT<sub>(S)</sub> test for all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The changes in the parameters were statistically significantly greater in Group 1 compared to the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subsequent measurements cause increased BUT values. The longer the interval between two measurements, the smaller the differences between the subsequent measurements. When performing the BUT test, a single measurement should be preferred if possible. If the clinician finds the results of a single measurement unsatisfactory and wishes to consider the average of multiple measurements, the interval between tests should be longer than 15 minutes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confounding factors in the tear break-up time test. Influence of sequential measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Yakup Acet, Yaşar Dağ\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164622.2025.2475202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The tear break-up time (BUT) test is important in diagnosing and monitoring tear film stability, and understanding potential changes in tear film dynamics during repeated measurements could improve the accuracy and reliability of the test in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aimed to examine the changes in BUT value caused by subsequent measurements made in BUT test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 female participants were divided into groups (30 individuals each). Participants were divided into four groups based on the interval between two non-invasive tear break-up time (NI-BUT) tests: Group 1 (1-minute interval), Group 5 (5-minute interval), Group 10 (10-minute interval), and Group 15 (15-minute interval). The first NI-BUT test was called Initial NI-BUT (NI-BUT<sub>(I)</sub>), and the second test was called Subsequent NI-BUT (NI-BUT<sub>(S)</sub>). The first BUTvalue (BUT<sub>1st</sub>), the second BUT value (BUT<sub>2nd</sub>), the third BUT value (BUT<sub>3rd</sub>), the fourth BUT value (BUT<sub>4th</sub>), the fifth BUT value (BUT<sub>5th</sub>), and the average value of the first three BUTs (BUT<sub>A3</sub>) were compared between the NI-BUT<sub>(1)</sub> and NI-BUT<sub>(S)</sub> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participant ages ranged from 18 to 36 years, with a mean of 25.1 ± 3.2 years. The mean values of BUT<sub>1st</sub>, BUT2<sub>nd</sub>, BUT3<sub>rd</sub>, BUT4<sub>th</sub>, BUT5<sub>th</sub>, and BUT<sub>A3</sub> in the NI-BUT<sub>(I)</sub> test were statistically significantly shorter than those in the NI-BUT<sub>(S)</sub> test for all groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The changes in the parameters were statistically significantly greater in Group 1 compared to the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subsequent measurements cause increased BUT values. The longer the interval between two measurements, the smaller the differences between the subsequent measurements. When performing the BUT test, a single measurement should be preferred if possible. If the clinician finds the results of a single measurement unsatisfactory and wishes to consider the average of multiple measurements, the interval between tests should be longer than 15 minutes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2475202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2025.2475202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床意义:泪液破裂时间(BUT)测试在诊断和监测泪膜稳定性方面很重要,了解反复测量时泪膜动力学的潜在变化可以提高临床实践中该测试的准确性和可靠性。背景:本研究旨在探讨在BUT试验中后续测量引起的BUT值的变化。方法:将120名女性受试者分为两组,每组30人。根据两次非侵入性撕裂破裂时间(NI-BUT)测试之间的间隔将参与者分为四组:第1组(间隔1分钟)、第5组(间隔5分钟)、第10组(间隔10分钟)和第15组(间隔15分钟)。第一次NI-BUT测试称为初始NI-BUT(NI-BUT(I)),第二次测试称为后续NI-BUT(NI-BUT(S))。比较NI-BUT(1)和NI-BUT(S)试验的第一个BUT值(BUT1st)、第二个BUT值(BUT2nd)、第三个BUT值(BUT3rd)、第四个BUT值(BUT4th)、第五个BUT值(BUT5th)和前三个BUT值(BUTA3)的平均值。结果:参与者年龄18 ~ 36岁,平均25.1±3.2岁。各组NI-BUT(I)检验中but1、but2、but3、but4、but5和butta3的平均值均显著短于NI-BUT(S)检验的平均值(p < 0.05)。两次测量之间的间隔越长,后续测量之间的差异就越小。在进行BUT测试时,如果可能的话,最好是单次测量。如果临床医生发现单次测量的结果不令人满意,并希望考虑多次测量的平均值,则两次测试之间的间隔应大于15分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confounding factors in the tear break-up time test. Influence of sequential measurements.

Clinical relevance: The tear break-up time (BUT) test is important in diagnosing and monitoring tear film stability, and understanding potential changes in tear film dynamics during repeated measurements could improve the accuracy and reliability of the test in clinical practice.

Background: The study aimed to examine the changes in BUT value caused by subsequent measurements made in BUT test.

Methods: A total of 120 female participants were divided into groups (30 individuals each). Participants were divided into four groups based on the interval between two non-invasive tear break-up time (NI-BUT) tests: Group 1 (1-minute interval), Group 5 (5-minute interval), Group 10 (10-minute interval), and Group 15 (15-minute interval). The first NI-BUT test was called Initial NI-BUT (NI-BUT(I)), and the second test was called Subsequent NI-BUT (NI-BUT(S)). The first BUTvalue (BUT1st), the second BUT value (BUT2nd), the third BUT value (BUT3rd), the fourth BUT value (BUT4th), the fifth BUT value (BUT5th), and the average value of the first three BUTs (BUTA3) were compared between the NI-BUT(1) and NI-BUT(S) tests.

Results: Participant ages ranged from 18 to 36 years, with a mean of 25.1 ± 3.2 years. The mean values of BUT1st, BUT2nd, BUT3rd, BUT4th, BUT5th, and BUTA3 in the NI-BUT(I) test were statistically significantly shorter than those in the NI-BUT(S) test for all groups (p < 0.05). The changes in the parameters were statistically significantly greater in Group 1 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Subsequent measurements cause increased BUT values. The longer the interval between two measurements, the smaller the differences between the subsequent measurements. When performing the BUT test, a single measurement should be preferred if possible. If the clinician finds the results of a single measurement unsatisfactory and wishes to consider the average of multiple measurements, the interval between tests should be longer than 15 minutes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信