太阳系Fe/Mg比值

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
D. S. Burnett, A. J. G. Jurewicz, D. S. Woolum, Y. Guan, V. S. Heber, R. Hervig, M. Humayun, K. D. McKeegan, L. R. Nittler, C. T. Olinger, D. B. Reisenfeld, J. Wang
{"title":"太阳系Fe/Mg比值","authors":"D. S. Burnett,&nbsp;A. J. G. Jurewicz,&nbsp;D. S. Woolum,&nbsp;Y. Guan,&nbsp;V. S. Heber,&nbsp;R. Hervig,&nbsp;M. Humayun,&nbsp;K. D. McKeegan,&nbsp;L. R. Nittler,&nbsp;C. T. Olinger,&nbsp;D. B. Reisenfeld,&nbsp;J. Wang","doi":"10.1111/maps.14313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Solar wind Fe and Mg fluences (atoms/cm<sup>2</sup>) were measured from Genesis collectors. Fe and Mg have similar first ionization potentials and solar wind Fe/Mg should equal the solar ratio. Solar wind Fe/Mg is a more valid measure of solar composition than CI chondrites and can be measured more accurately than spectroscopic photospheric abundances. Mg and Fe fluences analyzed in four laboratories give satisfactory agreement. Si and diamond-like carbon collector fluences agree for both elements. The Mg and Fe fluences are 1.731 ± 0.073 × 10<sup>12</sup> and 1.366 ± 0.058 × 10<sup>12</sup> atoms/cm<sup>2</sup>. All plausible sources of errors down to the 1% level are documented. Our value for the solar system Fe/Mg, 0.789 ± 0.048 agrees within 1 sigma errors with CI chondrites, spectroscopic photospheric abundances, and with the solar wind data from the ACE spacecraft. CI samples from asteroid Ryugu give Fe/Mg in agreement with Genesis and meteoritic CI samples despite very small sample sizes. The higher accuracy of the Genesis solar Fe/Mg permits a comparison with chondritic Fe/Mg at the 10% level. Intermeteorite Fe/Mg averages differ among the main C chondrite groups but are within, or very close to, the ±1 sigma Genesis solar Fe/Mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":18555,"journal":{"name":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","volume":"60 3","pages":"529-543"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14313","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The solar system Fe/Mg ratio\",\"authors\":\"D. S. Burnett,&nbsp;A. J. G. Jurewicz,&nbsp;D. S. Woolum,&nbsp;Y. Guan,&nbsp;V. S. Heber,&nbsp;R. Hervig,&nbsp;M. Humayun,&nbsp;K. D. McKeegan,&nbsp;L. R. Nittler,&nbsp;C. T. Olinger,&nbsp;D. B. Reisenfeld,&nbsp;J. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/maps.14313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Solar wind Fe and Mg fluences (atoms/cm<sup>2</sup>) were measured from Genesis collectors. Fe and Mg have similar first ionization potentials and solar wind Fe/Mg should equal the solar ratio. Solar wind Fe/Mg is a more valid measure of solar composition than CI chondrites and can be measured more accurately than spectroscopic photospheric abundances. Mg and Fe fluences analyzed in four laboratories give satisfactory agreement. Si and diamond-like carbon collector fluences agree for both elements. The Mg and Fe fluences are 1.731 ± 0.073 × 10<sup>12</sup> and 1.366 ± 0.058 × 10<sup>12</sup> atoms/cm<sup>2</sup>. All plausible sources of errors down to the 1% level are documented. Our value for the solar system Fe/Mg, 0.789 ± 0.048 agrees within 1 sigma errors with CI chondrites, spectroscopic photospheric abundances, and with the solar wind data from the ACE spacecraft. CI samples from asteroid Ryugu give Fe/Mg in agreement with Genesis and meteoritic CI samples despite very small sample sizes. The higher accuracy of the Genesis solar Fe/Mg permits a comparison with chondritic Fe/Mg at the 10% level. Intermeteorite Fe/Mg averages differ among the main C chondrite groups but are within, or very close to, the ±1 sigma Genesis solar Fe/Mg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"529-543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14313\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

太阳风Fe和Mg的影响(原子/平方厘米)由创世纪收集器测量。Fe和Mg具有相似的第一电离势,太阳风Fe/Mg应等于太阳比值。太阳风Fe/Mg是比CI球粒陨石更有效的太阳成分测量,比光谱光球丰度测量更准确。四个实验室对Mg和Fe的影响进行了分析,结果令人满意。硅和类金刚石碳捕集剂对这两种元素的影响一致。Mg和Fe的影响分别为1.731±0.073 × 1012和1.366±0.058 × 1012原子/cm2。所有可能的误差来源都被记录下来,误差低于1%。我们的太阳系Fe/Mg值为0.789±0.048,与CI球粒陨石、光谱光球丰度以及ACE航天器的太阳风数据在1西格玛误差内一致。来自小行星Ryugu的CI样品给出的Fe/Mg与创世纪和陨石CI样品一致,尽管样本量很小。创世纪太阳Fe/Mg的精度较高,可以与球粒铁/Mg在10%的水平进行比较。陨石间的Fe/Mg平均值在主要的C球粒陨石群中有所不同,但都在±1西格玛成因太阳Fe/Mg的范围内或非常接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The solar system Fe/Mg ratio

The solar system Fe/Mg ratio

Solar wind Fe and Mg fluences (atoms/cm2) were measured from Genesis collectors. Fe and Mg have similar first ionization potentials and solar wind Fe/Mg should equal the solar ratio. Solar wind Fe/Mg is a more valid measure of solar composition than CI chondrites and can be measured more accurately than spectroscopic photospheric abundances. Mg and Fe fluences analyzed in four laboratories give satisfactory agreement. Si and diamond-like carbon collector fluences agree for both elements. The Mg and Fe fluences are 1.731 ± 0.073 × 1012 and 1.366 ± 0.058 × 1012 atoms/cm2. All plausible sources of errors down to the 1% level are documented. Our value for the solar system Fe/Mg, 0.789 ± 0.048 agrees within 1 sigma errors with CI chondrites, spectroscopic photospheric abundances, and with the solar wind data from the ACE spacecraft. CI samples from asteroid Ryugu give Fe/Mg in agreement with Genesis and meteoritic CI samples despite very small sample sizes. The higher accuracy of the Genesis solar Fe/Mg permits a comparison with chondritic Fe/Mg at the 10% level. Intermeteorite Fe/Mg averages differ among the main C chondrite groups but are within, or very close to, the ±1 sigma Genesis solar Fe/Mg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 地学天文-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
31.80%
发文量
121
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: First issued in 1953, the journal publishes research articles describing the latest results of new studies, invited reviews of major topics in planetary science, editorials on issues of current interest in the field, and book reviews. The publications are original, not considered for publication elsewhere, and undergo peer-review. The topics include the origin and history of the solar system, planets and natural satellites, interplanetary dust and interstellar medium, lunar samples, meteors, and meteorites, asteroids, comets, craters, and tektites. Our authors and editors are professional scientists representing numerous disciplines, including astronomy, astrophysics, physics, geophysics, chemistry, isotope geochemistry, mineralogy, earth science, geology, and biology. MAPS has subscribers in over 40 countries. Fifty percent of MAPS'' readers are based outside the USA. The journal is available in hard copy and online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信