蔗糖和转化糖浆在蜜蜂体内的差别加工

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ratko Pavlović, Biljana Dojnov, Marinela Šokarda Slavić, Marina Ristović, Miroslava Vujčić, Sanja Stojanović, Zoran Vujčić
{"title":"蔗糖和转化糖浆在蜜蜂体内的差别加工","authors":"Ratko Pavlović,&nbsp;Biljana Dojnov,&nbsp;Marinela Šokarda Slavić,&nbsp;Marina Ristović,&nbsp;Miroslava Vujčić,&nbsp;Sanja Stojanović,&nbsp;Zoran Vujčić","doi":"10.1002/arch.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Feeding bees carbohydrates, as a substitute for nectar, has become essential in modern beekeeping. We compared the effects of 65% sucrose (SS) and 65% invert sugar (IS) syrups on the survival and enzyme activity of caged honey bees. Specifically, we analyzed glycosidase activity in the head and midgut of the bees and compared the composition of sucrose-based (SH) and invert sugar-based (IH) “honey” stored by the bees and collected from the comb. Glycosidase activity was similar in head in contrast to midgut where it was higher in IS fed bees, which appeared to be residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Fructose to glucose ratio in SH were 60.84/39.16 and a presence of some other sugars were detected, while ratio in IH were 48.49/51.51, almost exactly the same as in start fed (IS) (48.57/51.43). It has been demonstrated that glycosidase activity in IH was residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Zymogram detected α-amylase band in SH, in contrast to IH, which suggest that honey bees do not add amylase into IS. In contrast to SH, no crystallization occurred in IH. SS and IS densities were 1.23 and 1.24 g/mL, respectively, increasing to 1.35 g/mL in SH and 1.28 g/mL in IH after processing. This suggests that higher humidity and restricted cleansing flight make it harder for bees to remove excess water from IH, leading to increased midgut and hindgut weight, which correlates with higher mortality in the third week for the IS-fed group and fourth week for the SS-fed group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8281,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"118 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Processing of Sucrose and Invert Syrup in Honey Bees\",\"authors\":\"Ratko Pavlović,&nbsp;Biljana Dojnov,&nbsp;Marinela Šokarda Slavić,&nbsp;Marina Ristović,&nbsp;Miroslava Vujčić,&nbsp;Sanja Stojanović,&nbsp;Zoran Vujčić\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/arch.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Feeding bees carbohydrates, as a substitute for nectar, has become essential in modern beekeeping. We compared the effects of 65% sucrose (SS) and 65% invert sugar (IS) syrups on the survival and enzyme activity of caged honey bees. Specifically, we analyzed glycosidase activity in the head and midgut of the bees and compared the composition of sucrose-based (SH) and invert sugar-based (IH) “honey” stored by the bees and collected from the comb. Glycosidase activity was similar in head in contrast to midgut where it was higher in IS fed bees, which appeared to be residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Fructose to glucose ratio in SH were 60.84/39.16 and a presence of some other sugars were detected, while ratio in IH were 48.49/51.51, almost exactly the same as in start fed (IS) (48.57/51.43). It has been demonstrated that glycosidase activity in IH was residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Zymogram detected α-amylase band in SH, in contrast to IH, which suggest that honey bees do not add amylase into IS. In contrast to SH, no crystallization occurred in IH. SS and IS densities were 1.23 and 1.24 g/mL, respectively, increasing to 1.35 g/mL in SH and 1.28 g/mL in IH after processing. This suggests that higher humidity and restricted cleansing flight make it harder for bees to remove excess water from IH, leading to increased midgut and hindgut weight, which correlates with higher mortality in the third week for the IS-fed group and fourth week for the SS-fed group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"118 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arch.70052\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arch.70052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

给蜜蜂喂碳水化合物,作为花蜜的替代品,在现代养蜂中已经成为必不可少的。本研究比较了65%蔗糖(SS)和65%转化糖(IS)糖浆对笼养蜜蜂的生存和酶活性的影响。具体来说,我们分析了蜜蜂头部和中肠的糖苷酶活性,并比较了蜜蜂储存和从蜂巢收集的蔗糖基(SH)和转化糖基(IH)“蜂蜜”的组成。糖苷酶活性在头部与中肠相似,而在喂食IS的蜜蜂中,糖苷酶活性更高,这似乎是残留的酵母β-果糖呋喃苷酶活性。SH中果糖与葡萄糖的比值为60.84/39.16,并检测到其他糖的存在,而IH中果糖与葡萄糖的比值为48.49/51.51,与开始饲喂(IS)的比值(48.57/51.43)几乎完全相同。研究表明,葡萄糖苷酶活性为酵母β-果糖呋喃葡萄糖苷酶活性。与IH相比,酶谱在SH中检测到α-淀粉酶带,说明蜜蜂没有在IS中添加淀粉酶。与SH相比,IH未发生结晶。SS和IS浓度分别为1.23和1.24 g/mL,经处理后SH和IH分别为1.35 g/mL和1.28 g/mL。这表明,较高的湿度和有限的清洁飞行使蜜蜂更难从IH中去除多余的水分,导致中肠和后肠重量增加,这与is饲喂组第三周和ss饲喂组第四周的死亡率较高相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Processing of Sucrose and Invert Syrup in Honey Bees

Feeding bees carbohydrates, as a substitute for nectar, has become essential in modern beekeeping. We compared the effects of 65% sucrose (SS) and 65% invert sugar (IS) syrups on the survival and enzyme activity of caged honey bees. Specifically, we analyzed glycosidase activity in the head and midgut of the bees and compared the composition of sucrose-based (SH) and invert sugar-based (IH) “honey” stored by the bees and collected from the comb. Glycosidase activity was similar in head in contrast to midgut where it was higher in IS fed bees, which appeared to be residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Fructose to glucose ratio in SH were 60.84/39.16 and a presence of some other sugars were detected, while ratio in IH were 48.49/51.51, almost exactly the same as in start fed (IS) (48.57/51.43). It has been demonstrated that glycosidase activity in IH was residual yeast β-fructofuranosidase activity. Zymogram detected α-amylase band in SH, in contrast to IH, which suggest that honey bees do not add amylase into IS. In contrast to SH, no crystallization occurred in IH. SS and IS densities were 1.23 and 1.24 g/mL, respectively, increasing to 1.35 g/mL in SH and 1.28 g/mL in IH after processing. This suggests that higher humidity and restricted cleansing flight make it harder for bees to remove excess water from IH, leading to increased midgut and hindgut weight, which correlates with higher mortality in the third week for the IS-fed group and fourth week for the SS-fed group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology is an international journal that publishes articles in English that are of interest to insect biochemists and physiologists. Generally these articles will be in, or related to, one of the following subject areas: Behavior, Bioinformatics, Carbohydrates, Cell Line Development, Cell Signalling, Development, Drug Discovery, Endocrinology, Enzymes, Lipids, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology, Nucleic Acids, Nutrition, Peptides, Pharmacology, Pollinators, Proteins, Toxicology. Archives will publish only original articles. Articles that are confirmatory in nature or deal with analytical methods previously described will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信