用爱制造:考察消费者对手工制造与机器制造生产线索的参与度

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Tuba Degirmenci, Frank Mathmann, Gary Mortimer
{"title":"用爱制造:考察消费者对手工制造与机器制造生产线索的参与度","authors":"Tuba Degirmenci,&nbsp;Frank Mathmann,&nbsp;Gary Mortimer","doi":"10.1002/cb.2455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Advancing technologies have led to structural change in production methods, influencing not only business practices but also significantly reshaping consumer mindsets. Businesses increasingly utilise production cues, such as ‘handmade’, to differentiate their products and foster consumer engagement. While prior studies demonstrate that production cues can affect consumer responses, it remains unclear how the impact of these cues (e.g., handmade vs. machine-made) differs between consumer segments. Marketers remain uncertain about how to strategically leverage these effects across consumer profiles and product portfolios. Addressing this gap, this research applies regulatory mode theory, providing a nuanced understanding of production cues' impact on consumer engagement, with a focus on locomotion regulatory mode. Study 1, an online survey experiment, presents a moderated mediation analysis: while the effect of production cues on willingness to pay is mediated through love, this impact significantly varies with consumers' locomotion regulatory mode (low vs. high). Study 2 extends these findings through an automated text analysis of social media data (<i>n</i> = 9380), validating the moderating role of locomotion in a real-world context by analysing the marketer-generated content of Facebook posts. The findings of both studies confirm our predictions that production cues elicit distinct engagement responses depending on consumer segments: high-locomotion consumers, who value efficiency, show diminished engagement with production cues. This research advances the theory of production cue effects by offering novel insights and provides marketers with actionable implications for segmentation and targeted communication.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","volume":"24 2","pages":"982-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Made With Love: Examining Consumer Engagement With Handmade Versus Machine-Made Production Cues\",\"authors\":\"Tuba Degirmenci,&nbsp;Frank Mathmann,&nbsp;Gary Mortimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cb.2455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Advancing technologies have led to structural change in production methods, influencing not only business practices but also significantly reshaping consumer mindsets. Businesses increasingly utilise production cues, such as ‘handmade’, to differentiate their products and foster consumer engagement. While prior studies demonstrate that production cues can affect consumer responses, it remains unclear how the impact of these cues (e.g., handmade vs. machine-made) differs between consumer segments. Marketers remain uncertain about how to strategically leverage these effects across consumer profiles and product portfolios. Addressing this gap, this research applies regulatory mode theory, providing a nuanced understanding of production cues' impact on consumer engagement, with a focus on locomotion regulatory mode. Study 1, an online survey experiment, presents a moderated mediation analysis: while the effect of production cues on willingness to pay is mediated through love, this impact significantly varies with consumers' locomotion regulatory mode (low vs. high). Study 2 extends these findings through an automated text analysis of social media data (<i>n</i> = 9380), validating the moderating role of locomotion in a real-world context by analysing the marketer-generated content of Facebook posts. The findings of both studies confirm our predictions that production cues elicit distinct engagement responses depending on consumer segments: high-locomotion consumers, who value efficiency, show diminished engagement with production cues. This research advances the theory of production cue effects by offering novel insights and provides marketers with actionable implications for segmentation and targeted communication.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"982-1002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.2455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.2455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先进的技术导致了生产方法的结构性变化,不仅影响了商业惯例,而且大大改变了消费者的心态。企业越来越多地利用“手工制作”等生产线索来区分他们的产品,并促进消费者的参与。虽然先前的研究表明,生产线索可以影响消费者的反应,但仍不清楚这些线索的影响(例如,手工制作与机器制造)在不同消费者群体之间的差异。营销人员仍然不确定如何在消费者档案和产品组合中战略性地利用这些影响。为了解决这一问题,本研究运用了监管模式理论,对生产线索对消费者参与的影响提供了细致入微的理解,重点是运动监管模式。研究1是一项在线调查实验,提出了一个有调节的中介分析:生产提示对支付意愿的影响是通过爱来中介的,但这种影响在消费者的运动调节模式下存在显著差异(低与高)。研究2通过对社交媒体数据的自动文本分析(n = 9380)扩展了这些发现,通过分析Facebook帖子的营销生成内容,验证了运动在现实环境中的调节作用。这两项研究的结果都证实了我们的预测,即根据不同的消费者群体,生产线索会引发不同的参与反应:重视效率的高运动消费者对生产线索的参与程度会降低。本研究通过提供新颖的见解,推进了生产线索效应理论,并为营销人员提供了可操作的细分和目标沟通的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Made With Love: Examining Consumer Engagement With Handmade Versus Machine-Made Production Cues

Advancing technologies have led to structural change in production methods, influencing not only business practices but also significantly reshaping consumer mindsets. Businesses increasingly utilise production cues, such as ‘handmade’, to differentiate their products and foster consumer engagement. While prior studies demonstrate that production cues can affect consumer responses, it remains unclear how the impact of these cues (e.g., handmade vs. machine-made) differs between consumer segments. Marketers remain uncertain about how to strategically leverage these effects across consumer profiles and product portfolios. Addressing this gap, this research applies regulatory mode theory, providing a nuanced understanding of production cues' impact on consumer engagement, with a focus on locomotion regulatory mode. Study 1, an online survey experiment, presents a moderated mediation analysis: while the effect of production cues on willingness to pay is mediated through love, this impact significantly varies with consumers' locomotion regulatory mode (low vs. high). Study 2 extends these findings through an automated text analysis of social media data (n = 9380), validating the moderating role of locomotion in a real-world context by analysing the marketer-generated content of Facebook posts. The findings of both studies confirm our predictions that production cues elicit distinct engagement responses depending on consumer segments: high-locomotion consumers, who value efficiency, show diminished engagement with production cues. This research advances the theory of production cue effects by offering novel insights and provides marketers with actionable implications for segmentation and targeted communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.60%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Behaviour aims to promote the understanding of consumer behaviour, consumer research and consumption through the publication of double-blind peer-reviewed, top quality theoretical and empirical research. An international academic journal with a foundation in the social sciences, the JCB has a diverse and multidisciplinary outlook which seeks to showcase innovative, alternative and contested representations of consumer behaviour alongside the latest developments in established traditions of consumer research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信