老年人比年轻人产生更多的言语错误记忆:是语义还是执行功能?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Martina Cangelosi, Luca Rinaldi, Ton Dijkstra, Paola Palladino, Elena Cavallini
{"title":"老年人比年轻人产生更多的言语错误记忆:是语义还是执行功能?","authors":"Martina Cangelosi,&nbsp;Luca Rinaldi,&nbsp;Ton Dijkstra,&nbsp;Paola Palladino,&nbsp;Elena Cavallini","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A verbal false memory occurs when one remembers a word (called “critical lure”) as part of a previously presented list despite its absence. This phenomenon may be linked to the semantic associations of the critical lure with actual list items.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to investigate the mechanisms behind the increase in verbal false memories with aging, evaluating whether this is due to a greater reliance on semantic processing or impaired executive functioning.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, presenting DRM word lists to two age groups: young adults and older adults. In addition, participants completed the Hayling Sentence Completion Test to assess inhibition and the Backward Digit Span Task to evaluate working memory.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our findings confirm that older adults experience more verbal false memories than younger participants. Results suggest that both semantic processing reliance and inhibition impairment contribute to the increase in false memories with aging, while working memory was not significantly related to false memory production.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Older adults’ increased susceptibility to false memories appears to arise from an interplay between enhanced semantic reliance and inhibition deficits.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study proposes a novel integration of semantic and executive mechanisms underlying the observed increase in false memories during aging, with inhibition playing an unexpected role in enhancing false memory susceptibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older adults produce more verbal false memories than younger adults: is it semantics or executive functioning?\",\"authors\":\"Martina Cangelosi,&nbsp;Luca Rinaldi,&nbsp;Ton Dijkstra,&nbsp;Paola Palladino,&nbsp;Elena Cavallini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A verbal false memory occurs when one remembers a word (called “critical lure”) as part of a previously presented list despite its absence. This phenomenon may be linked to the semantic associations of the critical lure with actual list items.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to investigate the mechanisms behind the increase in verbal false memories with aging, evaluating whether this is due to a greater reliance on semantic processing or impaired executive functioning.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, presenting DRM word lists to two age groups: young adults and older adults. In addition, participants completed the Hayling Sentence Completion Test to assess inhibition and the Backward Digit Span Task to evaluate working memory.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our findings confirm that older adults experience more verbal false memories than younger participants. Results suggest that both semantic processing reliance and inhibition impairment contribute to the increase in false memories with aging, while working memory was not significantly related to false memory production.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Older adults’ increased susceptibility to false memories appears to arise from an interplay between enhanced semantic reliance and inhibition deficits.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study proposes a novel integration of semantic and executive mechanisms underlying the observed increase in false memories during aging, with inhibition playing an unexpected role in enhancing false memory susceptibility.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02914-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当一个人把一个单词(称为“关键诱惑”)作为之前呈现的列表的一部分而记住它时,就会发生言语错误记忆。这种现象可能与关键诱饵与实际列表项目的语义关联有关。目的:我们旨在研究随着年龄增长而增加的言语错误记忆背后的机制,评估这是由于对语义处理的更多依赖还是执行功能受损。方法采用Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM)范式,将DRM单词表呈现给两个年龄组:年轻人和老年人。此外,参与者还完成了Hayling句子完成测试来评估抑制作用,并完成了向后数字广度任务来评估工作记忆。结果:我们的研究结果证实,老年人比年轻人经历了更多的口头错误记忆。结果表明,随着年龄的增长,语义加工依赖和抑制障碍都导致错误记忆的增加,而工作记忆与错误记忆的产生没有显著相关。老年人对错误记忆的易感性增加似乎是由于增强的语义依赖和抑制缺陷之间的相互作用。结论本研究提出了一种新的语义和执行机制的整合机制,在衰老过程中观察到错误记忆的增加,抑制在增强错误记忆易感性中起着意想不到的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Older adults produce more verbal false memories than younger adults: is it semantics or executive functioning?

Background

A verbal false memory occurs when one remembers a word (called “critical lure”) as part of a previously presented list despite its absence. This phenomenon may be linked to the semantic associations of the critical lure with actual list items.

Aims

We aimed to investigate the mechanisms behind the increase in verbal false memories with aging, evaluating whether this is due to a greater reliance on semantic processing or impaired executive functioning.

Methods

We employed the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, presenting DRM word lists to two age groups: young adults and older adults. In addition, participants completed the Hayling Sentence Completion Test to assess inhibition and the Backward Digit Span Task to evaluate working memory.

Results

Our findings confirm that older adults experience more verbal false memories than younger participants. Results suggest that both semantic processing reliance and inhibition impairment contribute to the increase in false memories with aging, while working memory was not significantly related to false memory production.

Discussion

Older adults’ increased susceptibility to false memories appears to arise from an interplay between enhanced semantic reliance and inhibition deficits.

Conclusions

This study proposes a novel integration of semantic and executive mechanisms underlying the observed increase in false memories during aging, with inhibition playing an unexpected role in enhancing false memory susceptibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信