干预试验有什么可说的、可做的?作为职业健康行动资源的干预诊所

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Rouat , M.-É. Bobillier Chaumon
{"title":"干预试验有什么可说的、可做的?作为职业健康行动资源的干预诊所","authors":"S. Rouat ,&nbsp;M.-É. Bobillier Chaumon","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous theoretical and methodological frameworks exist for action in occupational health. Likewise, institutional recommendations and regulatory incentives have sought to change practices so that organizations can work to prevent risks. However, a number of obstacles stand in the way of this transformation. This article examines how the clinic of intervention can be a resource to support intervention processes aimed at transforming work. Based on a case study (an intervention carried out with psychologists working in occupational health departments), the authors seek to make visible the reality of an intervention, its concrete implementation and the reshuffles it brings about, as elements that reveal not only the obstacles and resistance in the field, but also the dilemmas in which the professionals themselves find themselves in the exercise of their profession. How do the trade-offs made by practitioners between their intervention framework and the reality of their work inform us about the intervention process and the social context in which it takes place? This is the main question addressed in this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"70 1","pages":"Pages 1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Que dire et faire des épreuves de l’intervention ? La clinique de l’intervention comme ressource pour agir en santé au travail\",\"authors\":\"S. Rouat ,&nbsp;M.-É. Bobillier Chaumon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psfr.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Numerous theoretical and methodological frameworks exist for action in occupational health. Likewise, institutional recommendations and regulatory incentives have sought to change practices so that organizations can work to prevent risks. However, a number of obstacles stand in the way of this transformation. This article examines how the clinic of intervention can be a resource to support intervention processes aimed at transforming work. Based on a case study (an intervention carried out with psychologists working in occupational health departments), the authors seek to make visible the reality of an intervention, its concrete implementation and the reshuffles it brings about, as elements that reveal not only the obstacles and resistance in the field, but also the dilemmas in which the professionals themselves find themselves in the exercise of their profession. How do the trade-offs made by practitioners between their intervention framework and the reality of their work inform us about the intervention process and the social context in which it takes place? This is the main question addressed in this article.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298424000220\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298424000220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业健康方面的行动有许多理论和方法框架。同样,机构建议和监管激励也在寻求改变实践,以便组织能够努力防止风险。然而,许多障碍阻碍了这种转变。本文探讨了干预诊所如何成为支持旨在转变工作的干预过程的资源。根据一个案例研究(在职业卫生部门工作的心理学家进行的干预),作者试图揭示干预的现实、干预的具体实施及其带来的洗牌,这些因素不仅揭示了该领域的障碍和阻力,而且揭示了专业人员在行使其专业时所面临的困境。从业者在他们的干预框架和他们工作的现实之间所做的权衡是如何告诉我们干预过程及其发生的社会背景的?这是本文要解决的主要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Que dire et faire des épreuves de l’intervention ? La clinique de l’intervention comme ressource pour agir en santé au travail
Numerous theoretical and methodological frameworks exist for action in occupational health. Likewise, institutional recommendations and regulatory incentives have sought to change practices so that organizations can work to prevent risks. However, a number of obstacles stand in the way of this transformation. This article examines how the clinic of intervention can be a resource to support intervention processes aimed at transforming work. Based on a case study (an intervention carried out with psychologists working in occupational health departments), the authors seek to make visible the reality of an intervention, its concrete implementation and the reshuffles it brings about, as elements that reveal not only the obstacles and resistance in the field, but also the dilemmas in which the professionals themselves find themselves in the exercise of their profession. How do the trade-offs made by practitioners between their intervention framework and the reality of their work inform us about the intervention process and the social context in which it takes place? This is the main question addressed in this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信