连续θ波爆发“强化”后顶叶皮层刺激治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的安全性和有效性:一项随机双盲假对照试验。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sarthak Bhandari, Mohan Dhyani, Shobit Garg, Sai Krishna Tikka
{"title":"连续θ波爆发“强化”后顶叶皮层刺激治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的安全性和有效性:一项随机双盲假对照试验。","authors":"Sarthak Bhandari, Mohan Dhyani, Shobit Garg, Sai Krishna Tikka","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Citing nonresponse to conventional treatments, neuromodulation based treatments are needed in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Data regarding continuous TBS (cTBS) in GAD has been anecdotal. Citing right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) hyperconnectivity in GAD, we aimed to study the effect of intensive cTBS targeting PPC in a randomized rater-blinded placebo-control design.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-four patients age range 18-59 years (baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] score >18 or Clinical Global Impression Severity [CGI-S] score of ≥4) were randomly allocated to active cTBS (n = 22) and sham cTBS (n = 22) groups using block randomization method. They received 10 cTBS sessions, 2 sessions per day (total of 1200 pulses) for 5 days in a week at 80% motor threshold. HAM-A, World Health Organization's abbreviated quality of life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and CGI-S were assessed at baseline, after the last session, and at 2 weeks after cTBS with gender as covariate. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted and missing values were replaced using the last observation carried forward method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On repeated measures analysis of variance, a significant between-group time effect for HAM-A (F = 29.6; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.420), CGI-S (F = 24.7; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.376), and WHOQOL-BREF (F = 29.6; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.420). Logs of odds of response of >50% improvement in HAM-A between active and sham groups is 3.27 (95% CI [0.345, 6.20]). No major side effects were reported and none discontinued the trial because of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our trial concludes that cTBS of posterior parietal cortex is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in GAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Theta Burst \\\"Intensive\\\" Posterior Parietal Cortex Stimulation in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sarthak Bhandari, Mohan Dhyani, Shobit Garg, Sai Krishna Tikka\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Citing nonresponse to conventional treatments, neuromodulation based treatments are needed in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Data regarding continuous TBS (cTBS) in GAD has been anecdotal. Citing right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) hyperconnectivity in GAD, we aimed to study the effect of intensive cTBS targeting PPC in a randomized rater-blinded placebo-control design.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-four patients age range 18-59 years (baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] score >18 or Clinical Global Impression Severity [CGI-S] score of ≥4) were randomly allocated to active cTBS (n = 22) and sham cTBS (n = 22) groups using block randomization method. They received 10 cTBS sessions, 2 sessions per day (total of 1200 pulses) for 5 days in a week at 80% motor threshold. HAM-A, World Health Organization's abbreviated quality of life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and CGI-S were assessed at baseline, after the last session, and at 2 weeks after cTBS with gender as covariate. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted and missing values were replaced using the last observation carried forward method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On repeated measures analysis of variance, a significant between-group time effect for HAM-A (F = 29.6; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.420), CGI-S (F = 24.7; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.376), and WHOQOL-BREF (F = 29.6; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.420). Logs of odds of response of >50% improvement in HAM-A between active and sham groups is 3.27 (95% CI [0.345, 6.20]). No major side effects were reported and none discontinued the trial because of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our trial concludes that cTBS of posterior parietal cortex is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in GAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于对常规治疗无反应,广泛性焦虑症(GAD)需要基于神经调节的治疗。关于广泛性焦虑症患者持续TBS (cTBS)的数据一直是轶事。以广泛性焦虑症患者右侧后顶叶皮质(PPC)超连通性为例,我们采用随机、非盲安慰剂对照设计,研究针对PPC的强化cTBS的效果。材料和方法:采用分组随机法,将44例年龄在18-59岁之间的患者(汉密尔顿焦虑量表[HAM-A]基线评分为bbbb18或临床总体印象严重程度[ci - s]评分≥4)随机分为活动cTBS组(n = 22)和假cTBS组(n = 22)。他们接受10次cTBS,每天2次(共1200次脉冲),每周5天,80%的运动阈值。HAM-A、世界卫生组织的简略生活质量评估(WHOQOL-BREF)和CGI-S在基线、最后一次会议后和cTBS后2周进行评估,性别为协变量。进行意向治疗分析,并用最后一次观察结转法替换缺失值。结果:经重复测量方差分析,HAM-A组间时间效应显著(F = 29.6;P = 0.001;ηp2 = 0.420), CGI-S (F = 24.7;P = 0.001;ηp2 = 0.376), WHOQOL-BREF (F = 29.6;P = 0.001;ηp2 = 0.420)。活跃组和假手术组hama改善50%的应答率为3.27 (95% CI[0.345, 6.20])。没有重大副作用的报道,也没有人因为副作用而中止试验。结论:我们的试验得出后顶叶皮质cTBS治疗广泛性焦虑症是安全、耐受性良好且有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Theta Burst "Intensive" Posterior Parietal Cortex Stimulation in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Trial.

Objectives: Citing nonresponse to conventional treatments, neuromodulation based treatments are needed in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Data regarding continuous TBS (cTBS) in GAD has been anecdotal. Citing right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) hyperconnectivity in GAD, we aimed to study the effect of intensive cTBS targeting PPC in a randomized rater-blinded placebo-control design.

Material and methods: Forty-four patients age range 18-59 years (baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] score >18 or Clinical Global Impression Severity [CGI-S] score of ≥4) were randomly allocated to active cTBS (n = 22) and sham cTBS (n = 22) groups using block randomization method. They received 10 cTBS sessions, 2 sessions per day (total of 1200 pulses) for 5 days in a week at 80% motor threshold. HAM-A, World Health Organization's abbreviated quality of life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF), and CGI-S were assessed at baseline, after the last session, and at 2 weeks after cTBS with gender as covariate. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted and missing values were replaced using the last observation carried forward method.

Results: On repeated measures analysis of variance, a significant between-group time effect for HAM-A (F = 29.6; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.420), CGI-S (F = 24.7; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.376), and WHOQOL-BREF (F = 29.6; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.420). Logs of odds of response of >50% improvement in HAM-A between active and sham groups is 3.27 (95% CI [0.345, 6.20]). No major side effects were reported and none discontinued the trial because of side effects.

Conclusions: Our trial concludes that cTBS of posterior parietal cortex is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in GAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信