常规咽淋病治疗试验:是一种有效的头孢菌素耐药淋病控制策略吗?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Laura A S Quilter, Rebekah Horowitz, Kellie Hall, Cortni Bardier, Jonathan Bell, Annika A Bergstrom, Jason Beverley, Stephanie E Cohen, Megan Coleman, Stephanie Devlin, Rachel Harold, Meya Harris, Kevin Kamis, Renuka Khurana, Robert Kohn, Christie Mettenbrink, Masayo Nishiyama, Madeline Sankaran, Benjamin Takai, Corinne Velasquez, Karen A Wendel, Laura H Bachmann, Lindley Barbee
{"title":"常规咽淋病治疗试验:是一种有效的头孢菌素耐药淋病控制策略吗?","authors":"Laura A S Quilter, Rebekah Horowitz, Kellie Hall, Cortni Bardier, Jonathan Bell, Annika A Bergstrom, Jason Beverley, Stephanie E Cohen, Megan Coleman, Stephanie Devlin, Rachel Harold, Meya Harris, Kevin Kamis, Renuka Khurana, Robert Kohn, Christie Mettenbrink, Masayo Nishiyama, Madeline Sankaran, Benjamin Takai, Corinne Velasquez, Karen A Wendel, Laura H Bachmann, Lindley Barbee","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends test-of-cure (TOC) for persons with pharyngeal gonorrhea (GC) 7-14 days after treatment. We investigated the yield and feasibility of routine pharyngeal GC TOC to detect treatment failures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During May 2021-July 2022, four U.S. STD clinics implemented pharyngeal GC TOC. Sites collected demographic, clinical, and behavioral data on all treated pharyngeal GC and positive TOC cases. Cases were dispositioned with the suspected reason for positive TOC. To assess perceived feasibility, sites participated in qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 1,968 pharyngeal GC infections were diagnosed. Among 1,829 treated cases, 97.3% (n = 1,777) received ceftriaxone and 45.7% (n = 836) returned for TOC, varying by site (range: 35.5%- 70.8%). Among those with TOC, 4.7% (n = 39) were positive by NAAT. Of these, 48.7% had culture attempted; six positive TOC (15.4%) were also positive by culture. Most positive TOC (66.7%) were attributed to re-infection (n = 13) or false-positive results (n = 13). Six (15.4%) were treatment failures. Four failed recommended treatment and had a positive culture: two were susceptible to ceftriaxone and two did not have antimicrobial susceptibility results. Seven positive TOC (17.9%) had insufficient data to disposition. Sites perceived TOC to be feasible, though substantial resources were required.ConclusionRoutine pharyngeal GC TOC yielded 5% positivity, though treatment failure was rare (<1%), and no cases of cephalosporin-resistant GC were identified. Low TOC return rates, limited culture collection, and limited culture yield highlight challenges to determining the cause of a positive TOC and the limitations of TOC in identifying cephalosporin resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine Pharyngeal Gonorrhea Test-of-Cure: Is It An Effective Cephalosporin-Resistant Gonorrhea Control Strategy?\",\"authors\":\"Laura A S Quilter, Rebekah Horowitz, Kellie Hall, Cortni Bardier, Jonathan Bell, Annika A Bergstrom, Jason Beverley, Stephanie E Cohen, Megan Coleman, Stephanie Devlin, Rachel Harold, Meya Harris, Kevin Kamis, Renuka Khurana, Robert Kohn, Christie Mettenbrink, Masayo Nishiyama, Madeline Sankaran, Benjamin Takai, Corinne Velasquez, Karen A Wendel, Laura H Bachmann, Lindley Barbee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends test-of-cure (TOC) for persons with pharyngeal gonorrhea (GC) 7-14 days after treatment. We investigated the yield and feasibility of routine pharyngeal GC TOC to detect treatment failures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During May 2021-July 2022, four U.S. STD clinics implemented pharyngeal GC TOC. Sites collected demographic, clinical, and behavioral data on all treated pharyngeal GC and positive TOC cases. Cases were dispositioned with the suspected reason for positive TOC. To assess perceived feasibility, sites participated in qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 1,968 pharyngeal GC infections were diagnosed. Among 1,829 treated cases, 97.3% (n = 1,777) received ceftriaxone and 45.7% (n = 836) returned for TOC, varying by site (range: 35.5%- 70.8%). Among those with TOC, 4.7% (n = 39) were positive by NAAT. Of these, 48.7% had culture attempted; six positive TOC (15.4%) were also positive by culture. Most positive TOC (66.7%) were attributed to re-infection (n = 13) or false-positive results (n = 13). Six (15.4%) were treatment failures. Four failed recommended treatment and had a positive culture: two were susceptible to ceftriaxone and two did not have antimicrobial susceptibility results. Seven positive TOC (17.9%) had insufficient data to disposition. Sites perceived TOC to be feasible, though substantial resources were required.ConclusionRoutine pharyngeal GC TOC yielded 5% positivity, though treatment failure was rare (<1%), and no cases of cephalosporin-resistant GC were identified. Low TOC return rates, limited culture collection, and limited culture yield highlight challenges to determining the cause of a positive TOC and the limitations of TOC in identifying cephalosporin resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疾病控制和预防中心建议在治疗后7-14天对咽淋病(GC)患者进行治愈试验(TOC)。我们探讨常规咽气相色谱TOC检测治疗失败的产率和可行性。方法:在2021年5月至2022年7月期间,四家美国性病诊所实施了咽GC TOC。网站收集了所有治疗过的咽GC和TOC阳性病例的人口学、临床和行为数据。病例被排除在TOC阳性的疑似原因。为了评估感知的可行性,网站参与了定性访谈。结果:研究期间确诊咽部GC感染1968例。在1829例治疗病例中,97.3% (n = 1777)接受了头孢曲松治疗,45.7% (n = 836)再次接受TOC治疗,各部位差异较大(范围:35.5%- 70.8%)。在TOC患者中,4.7% (n = 39)的NAAT阳性。其中,48.7%的人尝试过培养;培养TOC阳性6例(15.4%)。大多数TOC阳性(66.7%)归因于再感染(n = 13)或假阳性结果(n = 13)。治疗失败6例(15.4%)。4例推荐治疗失败,培养阳性:2例对头孢曲松敏感,2例没有抗生素敏感性结果。7例TOC阳性(17.9%)资料不足,无法处理。场址认为TOC是可行的,尽管需要大量资源。结论常规咽部GC TOC阳性率为5%,但治疗失败的病例较少(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine Pharyngeal Gonorrhea Test-of-Cure: Is It An Effective Cephalosporin-Resistant Gonorrhea Control Strategy?

Background: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends test-of-cure (TOC) for persons with pharyngeal gonorrhea (GC) 7-14 days after treatment. We investigated the yield and feasibility of routine pharyngeal GC TOC to detect treatment failures.

Methods: During May 2021-July 2022, four U.S. STD clinics implemented pharyngeal GC TOC. Sites collected demographic, clinical, and behavioral data on all treated pharyngeal GC and positive TOC cases. Cases were dispositioned with the suspected reason for positive TOC. To assess perceived feasibility, sites participated in qualitative interviews.

Results: During the study period, 1,968 pharyngeal GC infections were diagnosed. Among 1,829 treated cases, 97.3% (n = 1,777) received ceftriaxone and 45.7% (n = 836) returned for TOC, varying by site (range: 35.5%- 70.8%). Among those with TOC, 4.7% (n = 39) were positive by NAAT. Of these, 48.7% had culture attempted; six positive TOC (15.4%) were also positive by culture. Most positive TOC (66.7%) were attributed to re-infection (n = 13) or false-positive results (n = 13). Six (15.4%) were treatment failures. Four failed recommended treatment and had a positive culture: two were susceptible to ceftriaxone and two did not have antimicrobial susceptibility results. Seven positive TOC (17.9%) had insufficient data to disposition. Sites perceived TOC to be feasible, though substantial resources were required.ConclusionRoutine pharyngeal GC TOC yielded 5% positivity, though treatment failure was rare (<1%), and no cases of cephalosporin-resistant GC were identified. Low TOC return rates, limited culture collection, and limited culture yield highlight challenges to determining the cause of a positive TOC and the limitations of TOC in identifying cephalosporin resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信