晚期多病背景下的治疗负担和不确定性:一个集中的人种学。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Chris McParland, Bridget Johnston, Mark Cooper
{"title":"晚期多病背景下的治疗负担和不确定性:一个集中的人种学。","authors":"Chris McParland, Bridget Johnston, Mark Cooper","doi":"10.1177/10497323251320836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced multimorbidity is the term used to describe when someone has multiple chronic conditions including those which are associated with palliative care needs. People living with advanced multimorbidity have to coordinate and undertake lots of different tasks related to their chronic conditions, and this can lead to them feeling overburdened, and disengagement from treatment regimes. In this study, we sought to explore how this \"treatment burden\" was experienced by people with advanced multimorbidity and their caregivers. We adopted a focussed ethnographic approach, in which patient/carer dyads (six groups of two, recruited from an emergency department) took part in two semi-structured interviews and kept a participant-led journal of treatment burden experiences. We also offered to observe any burdensome activities, although only one such session was conducted. A reflexive thematic analysis of the data was conducted by a single researcher, in which data were coded both inductively and through the lens of Burden of Treatment Theory, plus two theories of uncertainty (Total Uncertainty and Uncertainty Tolerance). The types of patient work were split between practical tasks (such as taking medicines or going to hospital) and cognitively burdensome activities (such as symptom surveillance and planning ahead). Burden of Treatment Theory was useful in understanding how work was distributed between patients and their relational networks. We found that multidimensional uncertainty mediated the balance between workload and capacity, and we propose a conceptual model of this relationship alongside a suggestion for how interventions can be used to manage uncertainty and burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251320836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Burden and Uncertainty in the Context of Advanced Multimorbidity: A Focussed Ethnography.\",\"authors\":\"Chris McParland, Bridget Johnston, Mark Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497323251320836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advanced multimorbidity is the term used to describe when someone has multiple chronic conditions including those which are associated with palliative care needs. People living with advanced multimorbidity have to coordinate and undertake lots of different tasks related to their chronic conditions, and this can lead to them feeling overburdened, and disengagement from treatment regimes. In this study, we sought to explore how this \\\"treatment burden\\\" was experienced by people with advanced multimorbidity and their caregivers. We adopted a focussed ethnographic approach, in which patient/carer dyads (six groups of two, recruited from an emergency department) took part in two semi-structured interviews and kept a participant-led journal of treatment burden experiences. We also offered to observe any burdensome activities, although only one such session was conducted. A reflexive thematic analysis of the data was conducted by a single researcher, in which data were coded both inductively and through the lens of Burden of Treatment Theory, plus two theories of uncertainty (Total Uncertainty and Uncertainty Tolerance). The types of patient work were split between practical tasks (such as taking medicines or going to hospital) and cognitively burdensome activities (such as symptom surveillance and planning ahead). Burden of Treatment Theory was useful in understanding how work was distributed between patients and their relational networks. We found that multidimensional uncertainty mediated the balance between workload and capacity, and we propose a conceptual model of this relationship alongside a suggestion for how interventions can be used to manage uncertainty and burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10497323251320836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251320836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251320836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

晚期多重疾病是用来描述某人患有多种慢性疾病的术语,包括那些与姑息治疗需求相关的疾病。患有晚期多重疾病的人必须协调并承担与其慢性疾病相关的许多不同任务,这可能导致他们感到负担过重,并脱离治疗方案。在这项研究中,我们试图探索这种“治疗负担”是如何由晚期多病患者及其护理人员经历的。我们采用了一种集中的人种学方法,其中患者/护理人员二人组(从急诊科招募的六组二人组)参加了两次半结构化访谈,并记录了参与者主导的治疗负担经历日志。我们还表示愿意观察任何繁重的活动,尽管只举行了一次这样的会议。一名研究人员对数据进行了反身性专题分析,其中数据通过归纳和处理负担理论以及两种不确定性理论(完全不确定性和不确定性容忍)进行编码。病人的工作类型分为实际任务(如服药或去医院)和认知负担活动(如症状监测和提前计划)。治疗负担理论有助于理解工作是如何在病人和他们的关系网络之间分配的。我们发现,多维不确定性介导了工作量和能力之间的平衡,我们提出了这种关系的概念模型以及如何使用干预措施来管理不确定性和负担的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment Burden and Uncertainty in the Context of Advanced Multimorbidity: A Focussed Ethnography.

Advanced multimorbidity is the term used to describe when someone has multiple chronic conditions including those which are associated with palliative care needs. People living with advanced multimorbidity have to coordinate and undertake lots of different tasks related to their chronic conditions, and this can lead to them feeling overburdened, and disengagement from treatment regimes. In this study, we sought to explore how this "treatment burden" was experienced by people with advanced multimorbidity and their caregivers. We adopted a focussed ethnographic approach, in which patient/carer dyads (six groups of two, recruited from an emergency department) took part in two semi-structured interviews and kept a participant-led journal of treatment burden experiences. We also offered to observe any burdensome activities, although only one such session was conducted. A reflexive thematic analysis of the data was conducted by a single researcher, in which data were coded both inductively and through the lens of Burden of Treatment Theory, plus two theories of uncertainty (Total Uncertainty and Uncertainty Tolerance). The types of patient work were split between practical tasks (such as taking medicines or going to hospital) and cognitively burdensome activities (such as symptom surveillance and planning ahead). Burden of Treatment Theory was useful in understanding how work was distributed between patients and their relational networks. We found that multidimensional uncertainty mediated the balance between workload and capacity, and we propose a conceptual model of this relationship alongside a suggestion for how interventions can be used to manage uncertainty and burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信