德国版急性膀胱炎症状评分内容有效性的新证据:对患者和专家的认知访谈研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sophie Nestler, Christian Apfelbacher, Ebru Özkan, Kurt Naber, Katharina Piontek
{"title":"德国版急性膀胱炎症状评分内容有效性的新证据:对患者和专家的认知访谈研究。","authors":"Sophie Nestler, Christian Apfelbacher, Ebru Özkan, Kurt Naber, Katharina Piontek","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a clinically validated instrument to assess symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). A previous study examining the content validity of the German version of the ACSS has shown some methodological limitations when rated against the criteria for content validity of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. Extending the existing evidence, the present study aimed to assess the content validity of the German version of the ACSS according to the criteria of the COSMIN methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In individual cognitive interviews following a structured, standardized interview guide, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the ACSS in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated based on expert assessments to quantify content validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients and 14 experts participated in two rounds of interviews. The overall relevance and comprehensiveness of the instrument were rated as appropriate. Modifications focused on improving comprehensibility. Ten items underwent minor modifications or were given examples to enhance comprehensibility. The scales of five items were linguistically revised. Confirming good content validity, CVI was 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive qualitative assessments support content validity of the ACSS for evaluating symptoms and quality of life in women with uUTIs. Minor modifications addressed comprehensibility. Psychometric validation of the revised ACSS is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New evidence for content validity of the German version of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score: cognitive interview study among patients and experts.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Nestler, Christian Apfelbacher, Ebru Özkan, Kurt Naber, Katharina Piontek\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a clinically validated instrument to assess symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). A previous study examining the content validity of the German version of the ACSS has shown some methodological limitations when rated against the criteria for content validity of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. Extending the existing evidence, the present study aimed to assess the content validity of the German version of the ACSS according to the criteria of the COSMIN methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In individual cognitive interviews following a structured, standardized interview guide, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the ACSS in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated based on expert assessments to quantify content validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients and 14 experts participated in two rounds of interviews. The overall relevance and comprehensiveness of the instrument were rated as appropriate. Modifications focused on improving comprehensibility. Ten items underwent minor modifications or were given examples to enhance comprehensibility. The scales of five items were linguistically revised. Confirming good content validity, CVI was 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive qualitative assessments support content validity of the ACSS for evaluating symptoms and quality of life in women with uUTIs. Minor modifications addressed comprehensibility. Psychometric validation of the revised ACSS is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05406-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New evidence for content validity of the German version of the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score: cognitive interview study among patients and experts.

Purpose: The Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) is a clinically validated instrument to assess symptoms and quality of life in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs). A previous study examining the content validity of the German version of the ACSS has shown some methodological limitations when rated against the criteria for content validity of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. Extending the existing evidence, the present study aimed to assess the content validity of the German version of the ACSS according to the criteria of the COSMIN methodology.

Methods: In individual cognitive interviews following a structured, standardized interview guide, women with a history of uUTI and experts from different medical fields rated the instructions, items, response options and recall period of the ACSS in terms of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was calculated based on expert assessments to quantify content validity.

Results: A total of 14 patients and 14 experts participated in two rounds of interviews. The overall relevance and comprehensiveness of the instrument were rated as appropriate. Modifications focused on improving comprehensibility. Ten items underwent minor modifications or were given examples to enhance comprehensibility. The scales of five items were linguistically revised. Confirming good content validity, CVI was 0.97.

Conclusions: Comprehensive qualitative assessments support content validity of the ACSS for evaluating symptoms and quality of life in women with uUTIs. Minor modifications addressed comprehensibility. Psychometric validation of the revised ACSS is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信