持续低剂量阿司匹林下腰椎减压手术的围手术期安全性。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005330
Hiromitsu Takaoka, Ko Takano, Osamu Matsushige, Seiji Ohtori
{"title":"持续低剂量阿司匹林下腰椎减压手术的围手术期安全性。","authors":"Hiromitsu Takaoka, Ko Takano, Osamu Matsushige, Seiji Ohtori","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the changes in perioperative bleeding and overall safety associated with the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>There is no consensus on whether to continue the use of LDA in patients requiring spinal surgery. Furthermore, previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the impact of LDA on the risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution from 2014 to 2023, involving 375 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Of these, 98 were on LDA therapy and 207 were not. After excluding those on other antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapies, propensity score matching was applied, resulting in two groups of 89 patients each. The study assessed variables such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drain volume, and hemoglobin level changes up to one week post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LDA treated group (L group) experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (70.3 ml) compared to the non-LDA treated group (N group) (46.4 ml, P =0.003). Postoperative drain volumes did not differ significantly, but postoperatively, hemoglobin levels decreased by 2.2 g/dL in the L group and by 1.9 g/dL in the N group after one week ( P =0.04). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative transfusions or serious bleeding complications between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although LDA use was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and a significant drop in postoperative hemoglobin levels, it did not lead to serious bleeding complications. These findings suggest that with careful management, LDA can be safely continued in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery. However, the generalizability of these results is limited by the observational nature of the study and its single-center design.</p><p><strong>The level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Safety of Lumbar Decompression Surgery Performed Under Continuous Low-Dose Aspirin Administration.\",\"authors\":\"Hiromitsu Takaoka, Ko Takano, Osamu Matsushige, Seiji Ohtori\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the changes in perioperative bleeding and overall safety associated with the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>There is no consensus on whether to continue the use of LDA in patients requiring spinal surgery. Furthermore, previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the impact of LDA on the risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution from 2014 to 2023, involving 375 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Of these, 98 were on LDA therapy and 207 were not. After excluding those on other antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapies, propensity score matching was applied, resulting in two groups of 89 patients each. The study assessed variables such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drain volume, and hemoglobin level changes up to one week post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LDA treated group (L group) experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (70.3 ml) compared to the non-LDA treated group (N group) (46.4 ml, P =0.003). Postoperative drain volumes did not differ significantly, but postoperatively, hemoglobin levels decreased by 2.2 g/dL in the L group and by 1.9 g/dL in the N group after one week ( P =0.04). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative transfusions or serious bleeding complications between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although LDA use was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and a significant drop in postoperative hemoglobin levels, it did not lead to serious bleeding complications. These findings suggest that with careful management, LDA can be safely continued in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery. However, the generalizability of these results is limited by the observational nature of the study and its single-center design.</p><p><strong>The level of evidence: </strong>3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性临床分析。目的:探讨低剂量阿司匹林(LDA)对脊柱外科围手术期出血及整体安全性的影响。背景资料摘要:对于需要脊柱手术的患者是否继续使用LDA尚无共识。此外,关于LDA对术中和术后出血风险的影响,以往的研究结果并不一致。方法:回顾性队列研究于2014年至2023年在单一机构进行,纳入375例诊断为腰椎管狭窄的患者。其中,98人接受了LDA治疗,207人没有。在排除其他抗血小板或抗凝治疗后,应用倾向评分匹配,产生两组,每组89例患者。该研究评估了手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量和术后一周血红蛋白水平变化等变量。结果:LDA治疗组(L组)术中出血量(70.3 ml)明显高于非LDA治疗组(N组)(46.4 ml, P =0.003)。术后引流液量差异无统计学意义,但术后1周后,L组血红蛋白水平下降2.2 g/dL, N组血红蛋白水平下降1.9 g/dL (P =0.04)。两组患者术后输血及严重出血并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:虽然LDA的使用与术中出血量增加和术后血红蛋白水平明显下降相关,但并未导致严重的出血并发症。这些结果表明,通过精心管理,LDA可以安全地在腰椎减压手术患者中继续进行。然而,这些结果的普遍性受到研究的观察性质和单中心设计的限制。证据水平:3;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative Safety of Lumbar Decompression Surgery Performed Under Continuous Low-Dose Aspirin Administration.

Study design: Retrospective clinical analysis.

Objective: To investigate the changes in perioperative bleeding and overall safety associated with the use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) in spinal surgery.

Summary of background data: There is no consensus on whether to continue the use of LDA in patients requiring spinal surgery. Furthermore, previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the impact of LDA on the risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single institution from 2014 to 2023, involving 375 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Of these, 98 were on LDA therapy and 207 were not. After excluding those on other antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapies, propensity score matching was applied, resulting in two groups of 89 patients each. The study assessed variables such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drain volume, and hemoglobin level changes up to one week post-surgery.

Results: The LDA treated group (L group) experienced significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (70.3 ml) compared to the non-LDA treated group (N group) (46.4 ml, P =0.003). Postoperative drain volumes did not differ significantly, but postoperatively, hemoglobin levels decreased by 2.2 g/dL in the L group and by 1.9 g/dL in the N group after one week ( P =0.04). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative transfusions or serious bleeding complications between the groups.

Conclusion: Although LDA use was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and a significant drop in postoperative hemoglobin levels, it did not lead to serious bleeding complications. These findings suggest that with careful management, LDA can be safely continued in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery. However, the generalizability of these results is limited by the observational nature of the study and its single-center design.

The level of evidence: 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信