弗里德虚弱表型在评估腰椎融合手术术后效果中的预测价值。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Basma A Mohamed, Sandra C Yan, Ken Porche, Cynthia Garvan, Daniel J Hoh
{"title":"弗里德虚弱表型在评估腰椎融合手术术后效果中的预测价值。","authors":"Basma A Mohamed, Sandra C Yan, Ken Porche, Cynthia Garvan, Daniel J Hoh","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.SPINE24869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to validate the Fried frailty phenotype (FFP) in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients aged 65 years and older who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery between July 2015 and August 2021 at a single institution. The 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) and FFP were used to calculate frailty. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the comorbidity burden. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rates, and nonhome discharge. The authors evaluated the correlations among the mFI-11, FFP, and CCI using Spearman correlation testing. After categorizing frailty, they used multivariable regression to determine the relationships between the FFP, mFI-11, CCI, and postoperative outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 248 patients were included in the analysis. According to the FFP, 23% of patients were frail, and based on the mFI-11, 22% were frail. The FFP and mFI-11 were significantly correlated (rs = 0.20, p = 0.0019). LOS was not found to be significantly correlated with CCI and mFI-11. However, LOS was significantly correlated with the FFP (rs = 0.15, p < 0.0197). The FFP was found to be significantly associated with wound complications, with 44% of those with wound complications identified as frail (p = 0.0339). With regard to nonhome discharge, 52% identified as frail were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and 31% identified as frail were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (p = 0.0007). In contrast, the mFI-11 was not found to be significantly related to any complications or nonhome discharge. In the multiple regression model, the FFP was the best independent predictor of nonhome discharge after adjusting for mFI-11 and age. The odds of a nonhome discharge were four times higher for patients classified as frail using the FFP (OR 4.118, 95% CI 2.005-8.458; p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FFP strongly predicts nonhome discharge in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine fusion for degenerative spine disease. Frailty as identified using the FFP is significantly correlated with increased LOS, wound complications, and nonhome discharge, while the mFI-11 was not associated with LOS, complications, or nonhome discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive value of the Fried frailty phenotype in evaluating postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine fusion surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Basma A Mohamed, Sandra C Yan, Ken Porche, Cynthia Garvan, Daniel J Hoh\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.11.SPINE24869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this paper was to validate the Fried frailty phenotype (FFP) in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients aged 65 years and older who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery between July 2015 and August 2021 at a single institution. The 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) and FFP were used to calculate frailty. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the comorbidity burden. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rates, and nonhome discharge. The authors evaluated the correlations among the mFI-11, FFP, and CCI using Spearman correlation testing. After categorizing frailty, they used multivariable regression to determine the relationships between the FFP, mFI-11, CCI, and postoperative outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 248 patients were included in the analysis. According to the FFP, 23% of patients were frail, and based on the mFI-11, 22% were frail. The FFP and mFI-11 were significantly correlated (rs = 0.20, p = 0.0019). LOS was not found to be significantly correlated with CCI and mFI-11. However, LOS was significantly correlated with the FFP (rs = 0.15, p < 0.0197). The FFP was found to be significantly associated with wound complications, with 44% of those with wound complications identified as frail (p = 0.0339). With regard to nonhome discharge, 52% identified as frail were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and 31% identified as frail were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (p = 0.0007). In contrast, the mFI-11 was not found to be significantly related to any complications or nonhome discharge. In the multiple regression model, the FFP was the best independent predictor of nonhome discharge after adjusting for mFI-11 and age. The odds of a nonhome discharge were four times higher for patients classified as frail using the FFP (OR 4.118, 95% CI 2.005-8.458; p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FFP strongly predicts nonhome discharge in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine fusion for degenerative spine disease. Frailty as identified using the FFP is significantly correlated with increased LOS, wound complications, and nonhome discharge, while the mFI-11 was not associated with LOS, complications, or nonhome discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.SPINE24869\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.SPINE24869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The predictive value of the Fried frailty phenotype in evaluating postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine fusion surgery.

Objective: The aim of this paper was to validate the Fried frailty phenotype (FFP) in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients aged 65 years and older who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery between July 2015 and August 2021 at a single institution. The 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) and FFP were used to calculate frailty. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to assess the comorbidity burden. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rates, and nonhome discharge. The authors evaluated the correlations among the mFI-11, FFP, and CCI using Spearman correlation testing. After categorizing frailty, they used multivariable regression to determine the relationships between the FFP, mFI-11, CCI, and postoperative outcome measures.

Results: A total of 248 patients were included in the analysis. According to the FFP, 23% of patients were frail, and based on the mFI-11, 22% were frail. The FFP and mFI-11 were significantly correlated (rs = 0.20, p = 0.0019). LOS was not found to be significantly correlated with CCI and mFI-11. However, LOS was significantly correlated with the FFP (rs = 0.15, p < 0.0197). The FFP was found to be significantly associated with wound complications, with 44% of those with wound complications identified as frail (p = 0.0339). With regard to nonhome discharge, 52% identified as frail were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and 31% identified as frail were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (p = 0.0007). In contrast, the mFI-11 was not found to be significantly related to any complications or nonhome discharge. In the multiple regression model, the FFP was the best independent predictor of nonhome discharge after adjusting for mFI-11 and age. The odds of a nonhome discharge were four times higher for patients classified as frail using the FFP (OR 4.118, 95% CI 2.005-8.458; p = 0.0001).

Conclusions: The FFP strongly predicts nonhome discharge in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine fusion for degenerative spine disease. Frailty as identified using the FFP is significantly correlated with increased LOS, wound complications, and nonhome discharge, while the mFI-11 was not associated with LOS, complications, or nonhome discharge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信