IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Maksymilian M Zegota, Juliane Achenbach, Georg Schuster, Christian Schöneich, Tim Menzen, Andrea Hawe
{"title":"Direct comparison of single peak and gradient chromatographic methods for routine analysis of surfactants in biopharmaceuticals.","authors":"Maksymilian M Zegota, Juliane Achenbach, Georg Schuster, Christian Schöneich, Tim Menzen, Andrea Hawe","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The non-ionic surfactants polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80 and poloxamer 188 are prone to degradation, which necessitates their monitoring as part of the analytical strategy for surfactant- containing biopharmaceuticals. In this study, we discuss the challenges of analyzing partially degraded surfactant samples in the context of the most common quantification method - online solid-phase extraction using a mixed-mode column with analyte elution as a single peak. Additionally, we compare this single peak approach with gradient methods for surfactant quantification. To facilitate this comparison, we developed a simple gradient approach that allows for the rapid profiling of both polysorbates in 5.5 minutes and poloxamer 188 in 11 minutes, using liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with charged aerosol detection (CAD) or mass spectrometry (MS). We also included polyethylene glycol 15 hydroxystearate (HS15) as a possible alternative to the established surfactants. The gradient approach is a stability-indicating method that can detect compositional changes due to common degradation pathways, such as those induced by hydrolytic or oxidative stress, based on changes in the elution profile. The sensitivity of the single peak approach to degradation varies depending on the root cause. In conclusion, we present a workflow in which one chromatographic column employing fast gradients enables effective separation of the main surfactant components, facilitating both qualitative and quantitative analysis, as well as root cause analysis in case of observed degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"107065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非离子表面活性剂聚山梨醇酯 20、聚山梨醇酯 80 和 poloxamer 188 容易降解,因此有必要将其监测作为含表面活性剂生物制药分析策略的一部分。在本研究中,我们讨论了在最常用的定量方法(使用混合模式色谱柱进行在线固相萃取,分析物洗脱为单峰)背景下分析部分降解的表面活性剂样品所面临的挑战。此外,我们还将这种单峰方法与梯度法进行了比较。为了便于比较,我们开发了一种简单的梯度方法,使用液相色谱法(LC)结合带电气溶胶检测法(CAD)或质谱法(MS),可在 5.5 分钟内对聚山梨醇酯进行快速分析,在 11 分钟内对聚氧乙烯酰胺 188 进行快速分析。我们还将聚乙二醇 15 羟基硬脂酸酯(HS15)作为既定表面活性剂的可能替代品。梯度法是一种稳定性指示方法,可根据洗脱曲线的变化,检测常见降解途径(如水解或氧化压力引起的降解)导致的成分变化。单峰法对降解的灵敏度因根本原因而异。总之,我们介绍了一种工作流程,在该流程中,采用快速梯度的色谱柱可有效分离表面活性剂的主要成分,促进定性和定量分析,并在观察到降解的情况下进行根本原因分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct comparison of single peak and gradient chromatographic methods for routine analysis of surfactants in biopharmaceuticals.

The non-ionic surfactants polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80 and poloxamer 188 are prone to degradation, which necessitates their monitoring as part of the analytical strategy for surfactant- containing biopharmaceuticals. In this study, we discuss the challenges of analyzing partially degraded surfactant samples in the context of the most common quantification method - online solid-phase extraction using a mixed-mode column with analyte elution as a single peak. Additionally, we compare this single peak approach with gradient methods for surfactant quantification. To facilitate this comparison, we developed a simple gradient approach that allows for the rapid profiling of both polysorbates in 5.5 minutes and poloxamer 188 in 11 minutes, using liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with charged aerosol detection (CAD) or mass spectrometry (MS). We also included polyethylene glycol 15 hydroxystearate (HS15) as a possible alternative to the established surfactants. The gradient approach is a stability-indicating method that can detect compositional changes due to common degradation pathways, such as those induced by hydrolytic or oxidative stress, based on changes in the elution profile. The sensitivity of the single peak approach to degradation varies depending on the root cause. In conclusion, we present a workflow in which one chromatographic column employing fast gradients enables effective separation of the main surfactant components, facilitating both qualitative and quantitative analysis, as well as root cause analysis in case of observed degradation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
248
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development. More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making. Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信