IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kefah Ali Alqawasmeh, Thomas Mason, Abigail Morris, Wael Hafez, Thekra Hasan, Sondos Taher, Rania Al Dweik
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers to generic and biosimilar medications in the Middle East and North Africa: insights from physicians and pharmacists-a systematic review.","authors":"Kefah Ali Alqawasmeh, Thomas Mason, Abigail Morris, Wael Hafez, Thekra Hasan, Sondos Taher, Rania Al Dweik","doi":"10.1007/s00228-025-03819-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adoption of generic and biosimilar medications is crucial for improving healthcare accessibility and cost savings in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Understanding the factors that influence their acceptance is crucial for developing effective strategies for promoting their use.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers identified by healthcare professionals while prescribing and dispensing generic and biosimilar medications in the MENA region, focusing on their perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Cochrane guidelines and the \"Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews,\" a comprehensive search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted from 2012 to 2024. Studies assessing physicians' and pharmacists' perspectives on generics and biosimilars in the MENA region were included. Quality appraisal was performed using a standardized tool, the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized using a descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3570 screened citations, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 25 studies addressed facilitators and barriers to adopting generic medications, whereas 15 focused on biosimilars. Facilitators of generic medications included understanding the use of generics as cost-effective substitutes, supportive government policies, generic medication awareness, and pharmacists' empowerment to substitute medications. Barriers included knowledge gaps leading to distrust in efficacy and safety, the influence of pharmaceutical companies, cultural biases favoring brand name drugs, regulatory challenges, low consumer awareness, and concerns about pharmacists' profitability. Facilitators for biosimilars were mostly similar to generics, with an added emphasis on access benefit recognition when using biosimilars. Unique barriers included concerns about the lack of long-term safety data, hesitancy toward non-medical switching, and nocebo effect concerns. The quality assessment indicated that most studies were of moderate quality, with limitations such as sample size and representativeness, validity of the measurement tools, and potential biases of the researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant knowledge gaps regarding regulatory approval, safety, and efficacy hinder the adoption of generic drugs and biosimilars in MENA. Targeted educational initiatives at the regulatory and payer levels are essential for bridging these gaps, enhancing awareness, and fostering acceptance. Implementing comprehensive educational programs for physicians and pharmacists is crucial to support the transition toward the greater use of generics and biosimilars.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-025-03819-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在中东和北非(MENA)地区,采用仿制药和生物类似药对于提高医疗服务的可及性和节约成本至关重要。目的:本系统综述旨在研究中东和北非地区医护人员在处方和配发仿制药和生物类似药时发现的促进因素和障碍,重点关注他们的看法、知识和态度:根据 Cochrane 指南和《系统综述中进行叙事综合的指导原则》,对 2012 年至 2024 年的电子数据库和灰色文献进行了全面检索。纳入了评估中东和北非地区医生和药剂师对仿制药和生物仿制药看法的研究。采用标准化工具--混合方法评估工具 (MMAT) 进行了质量评估。研究结果通过描述性分析进行了综合:在经过筛选的 3570 篇引文中,有 39 篇符合纳入标准。其中,25 项研究探讨了采用非专利药的促进因素和障碍,15 项研究关注生物仿制药。非专利药的促进因素包括对使用非专利药作为具有成本效益的替代品的理解、政府的支持政策、对非专利药的认识以及药剂师对替代药物的授权。障碍包括:知识差距导致对疗效和安全性的不信任、制药公司的影响、偏爱品牌药的文化偏见、监管挑战、消费者认知度低以及对药剂师盈利能力的担忧。生物仿制药的促进因素大多与仿制药相似,但更强调在使用生物仿制药时获得利益认可。独特的障碍包括对缺乏长期安全性数据的担忧、对非医疗转换的犹豫不决以及对 "先兆效应 "的担忧。质量评估结果表明,大多数研究质量中等,存在样本量和代表性、测量工具的有效性以及研究人员的潜在偏见等局限性:有关监管审批、安全性和有效性方面的知识差距很大,阻碍了中东和北非地区对仿制药和生物仿制药的采用。在监管和支付方层面开展有针对性的教育活动对于弥合这些差距、提高认知度和促进接受度至关重要。为医生和药剂师实施全面的教育计划对于支持向更多使用仿制药和生物仿制药过渡至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facilitators and barriers to generic and biosimilar medications in the Middle East and North Africa: insights from physicians and pharmacists-a systematic review.

Background: The adoption of generic and biosimilar medications is crucial for improving healthcare accessibility and cost savings in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Understanding the factors that influence their acceptance is crucial for developing effective strategies for promoting their use.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to examine the facilitators and barriers identified by healthcare professionals while prescribing and dispensing generic and biosimilar medications in the MENA region, focusing on their perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes.

Methods: Following Cochrane guidelines and the "Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews," a comprehensive search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted from 2012 to 2024. Studies assessing physicians' and pharmacists' perspectives on generics and biosimilars in the MENA region were included. Quality appraisal was performed using a standardized tool, the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized using a descriptive analysis.

Results: Of the 3570 screened citations, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 25 studies addressed facilitators and barriers to adopting generic medications, whereas 15 focused on biosimilars. Facilitators of generic medications included understanding the use of generics as cost-effective substitutes, supportive government policies, generic medication awareness, and pharmacists' empowerment to substitute medications. Barriers included knowledge gaps leading to distrust in efficacy and safety, the influence of pharmaceutical companies, cultural biases favoring brand name drugs, regulatory challenges, low consumer awareness, and concerns about pharmacists' profitability. Facilitators for biosimilars were mostly similar to generics, with an added emphasis on access benefit recognition when using biosimilars. Unique barriers included concerns about the lack of long-term safety data, hesitancy toward non-medical switching, and nocebo effect concerns. The quality assessment indicated that most studies were of moderate quality, with limitations such as sample size and representativeness, validity of the measurement tools, and potential biases of the researchers.

Conclusion: Significant knowledge gaps regarding regulatory approval, safety, and efficacy hinder the adoption of generic drugs and biosimilars in MENA. Targeted educational initiatives at the regulatory and payer levels are essential for bridging these gaps, enhancing awareness, and fostering acceptance. Implementing comprehensive educational programs for physicians and pharmacists is crucial to support the transition toward the greater use of generics and biosimilars.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信