从浪费到健康--女性的需求:深入了解患者对局部阴道雌激素涂抹器的看法和环境因素。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ana Sofia Da Silva, Miriam O'Kane, Cathy Davis, Angie Rantell, George Araklitis, Dudley Robinson
{"title":"从浪费到健康--女性的需求:深入了解患者对局部阴道雌激素涂抹器的看法和环境因素。","authors":"Ana Sofia Da Silva, Miriam O'Kane, Cathy Davis, Angie Rantell, George Araklitis, Dudley Robinson","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2025.2473431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Environmental consciousness and the role of plastic waste are increasing. Topical vaginal estrogen prescription can be prescribed with one reusable plastic applicator or multiple single-use plastic applicators. User preference about the role of plastic in personal healthcare is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the applicator and environmental considerations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods questionnaire was employed to assess users' experience with topical vaginal estrogen applicators and their views on the environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two respondents had previously used estriol 0.1% cream and 77 had used estradiol 10 μg vaginal inserts. The mean age of participants was 67.3 years. The mean duration of use was 36.5 months, and the discontinuation rate was 26.1% and 29.9% for estriol 0.1% cream and estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users, respectively. Satisfaction with applicators and ease of use were similar in both groups. There was a higher report of the product being 'messy' (38.0% vs. 18.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.026) and 'not hygienic' (48.9% vs. 18.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) by estriol 0.1% cream users compared to estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users. Women aged <65 years demonstrated a greater concern about plastic use and the impact on the environment compared to women aged over 65 years (81.0% vs. 56.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The younger cohort showed a preference for reusable applicators (66.2%) compared to single-use applicators (33.8%) (<i>p =</i> 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in preference for women aged over 65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that younger postmenopausal women showed greater concern for plastic waste and its impact on the environment, with a preference for reusable products. Manufacturers of health products and prescribers should be aware of this growing trend. With similar overall satisfaction and side-effect profiles, users should be made aware of the different types of applicators available to help support an informed decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From waste to wellness - what women want: insights into patient perspectives on topical vaginal estrogen applicators and environmental considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Sofia Da Silva, Miriam O'Kane, Cathy Davis, Angie Rantell, George Araklitis, Dudley Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13697137.2025.2473431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Environmental consciousness and the role of plastic waste are increasing. Topical vaginal estrogen prescription can be prescribed with one reusable plastic applicator or multiple single-use plastic applicators. User preference about the role of plastic in personal healthcare is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the applicator and environmental considerations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods questionnaire was employed to assess users' experience with topical vaginal estrogen applicators and their views on the environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two respondents had previously used estriol 0.1% cream and 77 had used estradiol 10 μg vaginal inserts. The mean age of participants was 67.3 years. The mean duration of use was 36.5 months, and the discontinuation rate was 26.1% and 29.9% for estriol 0.1% cream and estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users, respectively. Satisfaction with applicators and ease of use were similar in both groups. There was a higher report of the product being 'messy' (38.0% vs. 18.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.026) and 'not hygienic' (48.9% vs. 18.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) by estriol 0.1% cream users compared to estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users. Women aged <65 years demonstrated a greater concern about plastic use and the impact on the environment compared to women aged over 65 years (81.0% vs. 56.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The younger cohort showed a preference for reusable applicators (66.2%) compared to single-use applicators (33.8%) (<i>p =</i> 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in preference for women aged over 65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that younger postmenopausal women showed greater concern for plastic waste and its impact on the environment, with a preference for reusable products. Manufacturers of health products and prescribers should be aware of this growing trend. With similar overall satisfaction and side-effect profiles, users should be made aware of the different types of applicators available to help support an informed decision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climacteric\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climacteric\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2473431\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2473431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人们的环保意识和塑料垃圾的作用日益增强。局部阴道雌激素处方可以使用一个可重复使用的塑料涂抹器或多个一次性塑料涂抹器。用户对塑料在个人医疗保健中的作用的偏好尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在探讨患者对涂抹器和环境因素的看法。方法:采用综合调查问卷法对使用者使用阴道外用雌激素涂布器的体验及对环境的看法进行评价。结果:92名受访者曾使用雌二醇0.1%乳膏,77名受访者曾使用雌二醇10 μg阴道插入物。参与者的平均年龄为67.3岁。雌二醇0.1%乳膏和雌二醇10 μg阴道插入剂的平均使用时间为36.5个月,停药率分别为26.1%和29.9%。两组患者对涂抹器的满意度和使用的易用性相似。认为产品“凌乱”的比例更高(38.0%比18.2%);P = 0.026)和“不卫生”(48.9% vs. 18.2%;p = 0.002)。与一次性涂抹器(33.8%)相比,年轻的队列显示出对可重复使用涂抹器的偏好(66.2%)(p = 0.005)。对65岁以上女性的偏好差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究表明,年轻的绝经后妇女对塑料废物及其对环境的影响表现出更大的关注,并倾向于使用可重复使用的产品。保健品制造商和处方医生应该意识到这一增长趋势。在总体满意度和副作用相似的情况下,用户应该了解不同类型的涂抹器,以帮助做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From waste to wellness - what women want: insights into patient perspectives on topical vaginal estrogen applicators and environmental considerations.

Objective: Environmental consciousness and the role of plastic waste are increasing. Topical vaginal estrogen prescription can be prescribed with one reusable plastic applicator or multiple single-use plastic applicators. User preference about the role of plastic in personal healthcare is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the applicator and environmental considerations.

Method: A mixed-methods questionnaire was employed to assess users' experience with topical vaginal estrogen applicators and their views on the environment.

Results: Ninety-two respondents had previously used estriol 0.1% cream and 77 had used estradiol 10 μg vaginal inserts. The mean age of participants was 67.3 years. The mean duration of use was 36.5 months, and the discontinuation rate was 26.1% and 29.9% for estriol 0.1% cream and estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users, respectively. Satisfaction with applicators and ease of use were similar in both groups. There was a higher report of the product being 'messy' (38.0% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.026) and 'not hygienic' (48.9% vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) by estriol 0.1% cream users compared to estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users. Women aged <65 years demonstrated a greater concern about plastic use and the impact on the environment compared to women aged over 65 years (81.0% vs. 56.9%; p = 0.002). The younger cohort showed a preference for reusable applicators (66.2%) compared to single-use applicators (33.8%) (p = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in preference for women aged over 65 years.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that younger postmenopausal women showed greater concern for plastic waste and its impact on the environment, with a preference for reusable products. Manufacturers of health products and prescribers should be aware of this growing trend. With similar overall satisfaction and side-effect profiles, users should be made aware of the different types of applicators available to help support an informed decision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climacteric
Climacteric 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信