{"title":"连续颗粒物空气监测定量方法性能评价方案的探讨。","authors":"William Evans","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>There has long been a need for an objective assessment of the performance of quantitative methods used for continuous particulate air monitors. These methods attempt to estimate the input to the monitor, the airborne radioactivity concentration (or its time integral), from its output, the detector response. This evaluation should include consideration of both the \"tracking ability\" of each method (i.e., its ability to follow a physically realistic time-varying concentration), as well as its ability to reduce the inherent random variability of its estimates. These two factors are in conflict, in the sense that optimizing one will worsen the other. A prototype scheme for this performance evaluation is presented, which uses a simulation of a fixed-filter monitor response to a known concentration profile and then finds an evaluation score using the residuals between that profile and the method's estimates as generated from the monitor response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Scheme for Evaluating the Performance of Continuous Particulate Air Monitor Quantitative Methods.\",\"authors\":\"William Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HP.0000000000001966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>There has long been a need for an objective assessment of the performance of quantitative methods used for continuous particulate air monitors. These methods attempt to estimate the input to the monitor, the airborne radioactivity concentration (or its time integral), from its output, the detector response. This evaluation should include consideration of both the \\\"tracking ability\\\" of each method (i.e., its ability to follow a physically realistic time-varying concentration), as well as its ability to reduce the inherent random variability of its estimates. These two factors are in conflict, in the sense that optimizing one will worsen the other. A prototype scheme for this performance evaluation is presented, which uses a simulation of a fixed-filter monitor response to a known concentration profile and then finds an evaluation score using the residuals between that profile and the method's estimates as generated from the monitor response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001966\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001966","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a Scheme for Evaluating the Performance of Continuous Particulate Air Monitor Quantitative Methods.
Abstract: There has long been a need for an objective assessment of the performance of quantitative methods used for continuous particulate air monitors. These methods attempt to estimate the input to the monitor, the airborne radioactivity concentration (or its time integral), from its output, the detector response. This evaluation should include consideration of both the "tracking ability" of each method (i.e., its ability to follow a physically realistic time-varying concentration), as well as its ability to reduce the inherent random variability of its estimates. These two factors are in conflict, in the sense that optimizing one will worsen the other. A prototype scheme for this performance evaluation is presented, which uses a simulation of a fixed-filter monitor response to a known concentration profile and then finds an evaluation score using the residuals between that profile and the method's estimates as generated from the monitor response.
期刊介绍:
Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.