圣保罗大学医学院das医院人口超声测定胎儿体重的正常范围

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eliane Azeka Hase, Amanda Amaral, Stela Verzinhasse Peres, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
{"title":"<s:1>圣保罗大学医学院das医院人口超声测定胎儿体重的正常范围","authors":"Eliane Azeka Hase,&nbsp;Amanda Amaral,&nbsp;Stela Verzinhasse Peres,&nbsp;Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the normal range of fetal weight by ultrasound in pregnant women followed at the Obstetric Clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnant women without associated maternal diseases, at 15–41 weeks of gestation, who underwent their last ultrasound up to 7 days before birth. Fetal parameters analyzed for the normal range were biparietal diameter, femur length, head and abdominal circumference. 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th weight percentiles were determined for each gestational age. Newborns were classified by birth weight as Small (SGA), Appropriate (AGA), or Large (LGA) for gestational age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 837 women admitted without maternal diseases, 136 were included and 379 examinations performed at 15–41 weeks of gestation. Multiple linear regression models were generated to develop the normal range of fetal weight. Three equations were selected, and six normal ranges were created considering the total population and stratified by fetal sex. Weight estimates were calculated for the 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th percentiles for each gestational age. Among the 136 newborns, 107 (78.7 %) were classified as AGA, 23 (16.9 %) as SGA, and 6 (4.4 %) as LGA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The normal range of the fetal weight determined by ultrasound in this population showed a good correlation with gestational age, enabling the fetal weight gain pattern evaluation. The equation based on four parameters, including days before birth, presented the lowest percentage error variation to estimate the normal range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normal ranges of the fetal weight determined by ultrasound in the population of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo\",\"authors\":\"Eliane Azeka Hase,&nbsp;Amanda Amaral,&nbsp;Stela Verzinhasse Peres,&nbsp;Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to determine the normal range of fetal weight by ultrasound in pregnant women followed at the Obstetric Clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnant women without associated maternal diseases, at 15–41 weeks of gestation, who underwent their last ultrasound up to 7 days before birth. Fetal parameters analyzed for the normal range were biparietal diameter, femur length, head and abdominal circumference. 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th weight percentiles were determined for each gestational age. Newborns were classified by birth weight as Small (SGA), Appropriate (AGA), or Large (LGA) for gestational age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 837 women admitted without maternal diseases, 136 were included and 379 examinations performed at 15–41 weeks of gestation. Multiple linear regression models were generated to develop the normal range of fetal weight. Three equations were selected, and six normal ranges were created considering the total population and stratified by fetal sex. Weight estimates were calculated for the 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th percentiles for each gestational age. Among the 136 newborns, 107 (78.7 %) were classified as AGA, 23 (16.9 %) as SGA, and 6 (4.4 %) as LGA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The normal range of the fetal weight determined by ultrasound in this population showed a good correlation with gestational age, enabling the fetal weight gain pattern evaluation. The equation based on four parameters, including days before birth, presented the lowest percentage error variation to estimate the normal range.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593225000420\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593225000420","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过超声确定圣保罗大学医学院Clínicas医院产科门诊孕妇胎儿体重的正常范围。方法本回顾性队列研究纳入了妊娠15-41周无相关母体疾病的单胎孕妇,她们在出生前7天前进行了最后一次超声检查。正常范围内的胎儿参数包括双顶骨直径、股骨长、头围和腹围。测定每个胎龄的第3、第10、第50、第90和第97个体重百分位数。新生儿按出生体重分为小(SGA),适当(AGA),或大(LGA)胎龄。结果837例无孕产妇疾病的住院妇女中,136例纳入,379例在妊娠15 ~ 41周检查。采用多元线性回归模型建立胎儿体重正常范围。选取3个方程,根据总体情况建立6个正常范围,并按胎儿性别分层。计算每个胎龄的第3、第10、第50、第90和第97百分位的体重估计值。136例新生儿中,AGA 107例(78.7%),SGA 23例(16.9%),LGA 6例(4.4%)。结论超声测得的胎儿体重正常范围与胎龄有较好的相关性,可用于胎儿增重模式的评价。该方程基于四个参数,包括出生前天数,呈现出最低百分比的误差变化,以估计正常范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normal ranges of the fetal weight determined by ultrasound in the population of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Objective

This study aimed to determine the normal range of fetal weight by ultrasound in pregnant women followed at the Obstetric Clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnant women without associated maternal diseases, at 15–41 weeks of gestation, who underwent their last ultrasound up to 7 days before birth. Fetal parameters analyzed for the normal range were biparietal diameter, femur length, head and abdominal circumference. 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th weight percentiles were determined for each gestational age. Newborns were classified by birth weight as Small (SGA), Appropriate (AGA), or Large (LGA) for gestational age.

Results

Among 837 women admitted without maternal diseases, 136 were included and 379 examinations performed at 15–41 weeks of gestation. Multiple linear regression models were generated to develop the normal range of fetal weight. Three equations were selected, and six normal ranges were created considering the total population and stratified by fetal sex. Weight estimates were calculated for the 3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th, and 97th percentiles for each gestational age. Among the 136 newborns, 107 (78.7 %) were classified as AGA, 23 (16.9 %) as SGA, and 6 (4.4 %) as LGA.

Conclusion

The normal range of the fetal weight determined by ultrasound in this population showed a good correlation with gestational age, enabling the fetal weight gain pattern evaluation. The equation based on four parameters, including days before birth, presented the lowest percentage error variation to estimate the normal range.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信