不同放置位置股骨颈系统固定Pauwels型Ⅲ股骨颈骨折的有限元分析

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
YongJia Zhu , Shuai Wu , JiaPeng Yan , Wenhong Wang , Xiao Huang , HongFei Zhang
{"title":"不同放置位置股骨颈系统固定Pauwels型Ⅲ股骨颈骨折的有限元分析","authors":"YongJia Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuai Wu ,&nbsp;JiaPeng Yan ,&nbsp;Wenhong Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Huang ,&nbsp;HongFei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to identify the optimal position for the femoral neck system (FNS) device when fixing Pauwels III #NOF, by analyzing the mechanical stability and stress distribution of FNS at different screw placement positions for the fixation of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We employed finite element analysis to create a 3D model of a Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Six models were designed, each with varied FNS screw placement positions. Axial stresses of 600 N, 1200 N, and 1800 N were applied to simulate physiological loads during different activities: standing on two legs, standing on one leg, and walking. The mechanical properties of these screw placements were assessed by comparing stress distribution, displacement, and fracture stability across models under varying load conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Model 1, with the power rod aligned along the femoral neck axis, showed the best stability, with 42.40 % lower maximum VMS and 18.49 % less femoral displacement, compared to the worst model. Displacement of the internal fixation and fracture surface decreased by 21.72 % and 19.16 %, respectively. It also had superior results for internal fixation VMS and fracture surface compressive stress. Model 2, with the head screw centered axially, demonstrated good stability but had higher stress concentrations under 1800 N load. The displacement of the fracture surface and femur in model 2 increased by 18.37 % and 17.26 %, respectively, compared to model 1. Models 5 and 6, with the FNS nail near the lateral femoral cortex, showed significant stress concentrations, with compressive and shear forces rising by about 33 %. Model 5′s maximum VMS increased by 46.68 %, and model 6′s maximum compressive stress of the fracture surface increased by 46.37 %, compared to model 1. Models 3 and 4, with the power rod shifted up or down, displayed moderate stability, reducing displacement in some tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This finite element analysis highlights that centring the FNS power rod along the femoral neck axis significantly enhances fracture stability and minimises postoperative displacement. Conversely, poor screw placement may result in mechanical stress concentration, raising the risk of nonunion or malunion. Clinicians should prioritise screw placements with more excellent mechanical stability to optimise treatment outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 4","pages":"Article 112218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element analysis of the Femoral neck system for different placement positions in the fixation of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures\",\"authors\":\"YongJia Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuai Wu ,&nbsp;JiaPeng Yan ,&nbsp;Wenhong Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Huang ,&nbsp;HongFei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to identify the optimal position for the femoral neck system (FNS) device when fixing Pauwels III #NOF, by analyzing the mechanical stability and stress distribution of FNS at different screw placement positions for the fixation of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We employed finite element analysis to create a 3D model of a Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Six models were designed, each with varied FNS screw placement positions. Axial stresses of 600 N, 1200 N, and 1800 N were applied to simulate physiological loads during different activities: standing on two legs, standing on one leg, and walking. The mechanical properties of these screw placements were assessed by comparing stress distribution, displacement, and fracture stability across models under varying load conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Model 1, with the power rod aligned along the femoral neck axis, showed the best stability, with 42.40 % lower maximum VMS and 18.49 % less femoral displacement, compared to the worst model. Displacement of the internal fixation and fracture surface decreased by 21.72 % and 19.16 %, respectively. It also had superior results for internal fixation VMS and fracture surface compressive stress. Model 2, with the head screw centered axially, demonstrated good stability but had higher stress concentrations under 1800 N load. The displacement of the fracture surface and femur in model 2 increased by 18.37 % and 17.26 %, respectively, compared to model 1. Models 5 and 6, with the FNS nail near the lateral femoral cortex, showed significant stress concentrations, with compressive and shear forces rising by about 33 %. Model 5′s maximum VMS increased by 46.68 %, and model 6′s maximum compressive stress of the fracture surface increased by 46.37 %, compared to model 1. Models 3 and 4, with the power rod shifted up or down, displayed moderate stability, reducing displacement in some tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This finite element analysis highlights that centring the FNS power rod along the femoral neck axis significantly enhances fracture stability and minimises postoperative displacement. Conversely, poor screw placement may result in mechanical stress concentration, raising the risk of nonunion or malunion. Clinicians should prioritise screw placements with more excellent mechanical stability to optimise treatment outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 112218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000786\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325000786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过分析FNS在不同螺钉放置位置固定Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折时的力学稳定性和应力分布,确定FNS固定Pauwels III #NOF的最佳位置。方法采用有限元方法建立Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的三维模型。设计了6个模型,每个模型都有不同的FNS螺钉放置位置。分别施加600、1200和1800 N的轴向应力,模拟两腿站立、单腿站立和行走时的生理负荷。通过比较不同载荷条件下不同模型的应力分布、位移和断裂稳定性来评估这些螺钉放置的力学性能。结果与最差模型相比,动力棒沿股骨颈轴排列的模型1稳定性最好,最大VMS降低42.40%,股骨移位减少18.49%。内固定和骨折面位移分别减少21.72%和19.16%。对内固定VMS和骨折面压应力也有较好的效果。模型2在1800 N载荷下稳定性较好,但应力集中较高。与模型1相比,模型2的骨折面和股骨位移分别增加了18.37%和17.26%。模型5和模型6中,FNS钉靠近股外侧皮质,出现了明显的应力集中,压缩和剪切力增加了约33%。与模型1相比,模型5的最大VMS增加了46.68%,模型6的裂缝表面最大压应力增加了46.37%。当动力杆向上或向下移动时,模型3和模型4表现出适度的稳定性,在一些测试中减少了位移。结论本有限元分析强调沿股骨颈轴将FNS动力棒居中可显著提高骨折稳定性并减少术后移位。相反,螺钉放置不良可能导致机械应力集中,增加不愈合或不愈合的风险。临床医生应优先选择机械稳定性更好的螺钉置入,以优化治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite element analysis of the Femoral neck system for different placement positions in the fixation of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures

Objective

This study aimed to identify the optimal position for the femoral neck system (FNS) device when fixing Pauwels III #NOF, by analyzing the mechanical stability and stress distribution of FNS at different screw placement positions for the fixation of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures.

Methods

We employed finite element analysis to create a 3D model of a Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Six models were designed, each with varied FNS screw placement positions. Axial stresses of 600 N, 1200 N, and 1800 N were applied to simulate physiological loads during different activities: standing on two legs, standing on one leg, and walking. The mechanical properties of these screw placements were assessed by comparing stress distribution, displacement, and fracture stability across models under varying load conditions.

Results

Model 1, with the power rod aligned along the femoral neck axis, showed the best stability, with 42.40 % lower maximum VMS and 18.49 % less femoral displacement, compared to the worst model. Displacement of the internal fixation and fracture surface decreased by 21.72 % and 19.16 %, respectively. It also had superior results for internal fixation VMS and fracture surface compressive stress. Model 2, with the head screw centered axially, demonstrated good stability but had higher stress concentrations under 1800 N load. The displacement of the fracture surface and femur in model 2 increased by 18.37 % and 17.26 %, respectively, compared to model 1. Models 5 and 6, with the FNS nail near the lateral femoral cortex, showed significant stress concentrations, with compressive and shear forces rising by about 33 %. Model 5′s maximum VMS increased by 46.68 %, and model 6′s maximum compressive stress of the fracture surface increased by 46.37 %, compared to model 1. Models 3 and 4, with the power rod shifted up or down, displayed moderate stability, reducing displacement in some tests.

Conclusion

This finite element analysis highlights that centring the FNS power rod along the femoral neck axis significantly enhances fracture stability and minimises postoperative displacement. Conversely, poor screw placement may result in mechanical stress concentration, raising the risk of nonunion or malunion. Clinicians should prioritise screw placements with more excellent mechanical stability to optimise treatment outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信