IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Muhammad Usman Khalid MBBS , Danish Ali MBBS , Jie Ying Wu PhD , Hanjoo Lee MD , Aimal Khan MD, FACS
{"title":"Impact and Measurement of Mechanical Tension in Bowel Anastomosis: A Scoping Review of the Current Literature","authors":"Muhammad Usman Khalid MBBS ,&nbsp;Danish Ali MBBS ,&nbsp;Jie Ying Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Hanjoo Lee MD ,&nbsp;Aimal Khan MD, FACS","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Creating a “tension-free anastomosis” is a fundamental principle in safe bowel surgery. This review aims to summarize the current literature regarding the measurement and impact of tension on bowel anastomoses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted using a systematic literature search in the PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases. Data were synthesized in tables and summarized paragraphically, with studies assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of the 350 studies identified in the initial literature review, 25 were included in this study. Several studies indicated that anastomotic leak and tension are strongly associated, with the presence of tension making leaks up to 10 times more likely. However, no objective and clinically available methods exist to measure tension on bowel anastomosis in humans. Freedom from tension has traditionally been measured via surrogate measures of adequate bowel mobilization and subjective assessment by operating surgeons. Animal and cadaveric studies have been the frontier for objective measurement of wall tension. These studies use tensiometers to measure tension and automated machines or pulley and ratcheting systems to increase tension at specified intervals. However, these methods are universally destructive due to their design of measuring maximal tensile load and are not readily adaptable to the operating room.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current literature does not address the objective measurement of bowel tension in live human subjects. Given the importance of tension, developing an objective, safe, intraoperative method to measure bowel wall tension would be a valuable surgical tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 161-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言创造 "无张力吻合 "是安全肠道手术的基本原则。本综述旨在总结有关肠吻合口张力的测量和影响的现有文献。方法本范围性综述在 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 EMBASE 数据库中进行了系统性文献检索。结果在初步文献综述中确定的 350 项研究中,有 25 项被纳入本研究。多项研究表明,吻合口漏与张力密切相关,张力的存在使吻合口漏的可能性增加了 10 倍。然而,临床上还没有客观的方法来测量人体肠道吻合口的张力。无张力传统上是通过充分的肠管移动替代措施和手术外科医生的主观评估来衡量的。动物和尸体研究是客观测量肠壁张力的前沿。这些研究使用张力计测量张力,并使用自动机器或滑轮和棘轮系统在指定时间间隔内增加张力。然而,这些方法由于其测量最大拉伸负荷的设计而具有普遍的破坏性,并且不适合手术室使用。鉴于张力的重要性,开发一种客观、安全、术中测量肠壁张力的方法将是一种有价值的手术工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact and Measurement of Mechanical Tension in Bowel Anastomosis: A Scoping Review of the Current Literature

Introduction

Creating a “tension-free anastomosis” is a fundamental principle in safe bowel surgery. This review aims to summarize the current literature regarding the measurement and impact of tension on bowel anastomoses.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted using a systematic literature search in the PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases. Data were synthesized in tables and summarized paragraphically, with studies assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Results

Out of the 350 studies identified in the initial literature review, 25 were included in this study. Several studies indicated that anastomotic leak and tension are strongly associated, with the presence of tension making leaks up to 10 times more likely. However, no objective and clinically available methods exist to measure tension on bowel anastomosis in humans. Freedom from tension has traditionally been measured via surrogate measures of adequate bowel mobilization and subjective assessment by operating surgeons. Animal and cadaveric studies have been the frontier for objective measurement of wall tension. These studies use tensiometers to measure tension and automated machines or pulley and ratcheting systems to increase tension at specified intervals. However, these methods are universally destructive due to their design of measuring maximal tensile load and are not readily adaptable to the operating room.

Conclusions

The current literature does not address the objective measurement of bowel tension in live human subjects. Given the importance of tension, developing an objective, safe, intraoperative method to measure bowel wall tension would be a valuable surgical tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信