IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Timo Gnambs , Jan-Philipp Stein , Sabine Zinn , Florian Griese , Markus Appel
{"title":"Attitudes, experiences, and usage intentions of artificial intelligence: A population study in Germany","authors":"Timo Gnambs ,&nbsp;Jan-Philipp Stein ,&nbsp;Sabine Zinn ,&nbsp;Florian Griese ,&nbsp;Markus Appel","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly affects individuals’ private and professional lives. Importantly, both the acceptance and adoption of new AI technologies in society is heavily impacted by the attitudes that people hold; yet, there is currently limited information on how people perceive and intend to use AI at the national and demographic levels. Therefore, this study examined a random sample of 1,098 German adults to assess their attitudes, experiences, and usage intentions regarding AI in work, healthcare, and education. The findings indicated that respondents generally held favorable attitudes towards AI, with AI applications in healthcare receiving more positive evaluations than AI in the context of work. Moreover, cognitive evaluations of AI were more positive than emotional or behavioral appraisals. Prior experiences with AI were, however, limited, particularly in healthcare and education. Demographic differences were generally small. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that, in Germany, AI is currently widely accepted in different domains, although most people have little first-hand experience with it. These insights can inform policymakers and stakeholders who care about the proliferation of AI in society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102265"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)越来越多地影响着个人的私人生活和职业生活。重要的是,社会对新人工智能技术的接受和采用在很大程度上受到人们所持态度的影响;然而,目前有关人们如何看待和打算在国家和人口层面使用人工智能的信息十分有限。因此,本研究对 1,098 名德国成年人进行了随机抽样,以评估他们在工作、医疗保健和教育领域对人工智能的态度、体验和使用意向。研究结果表明,受访者普遍对人工智能持赞成态度,其中医疗保健领域的人工智能应用比工作领域的人工智能获得了更积极的评价。此外,对人工智能的认知评价比情感或行为评价更为积极。不过,受访者以前使用人工智能的经验有限,尤其是在医疗保健和教育领域。人口统计学差异一般较小。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,在德国,尽管大多数人对人工智能的亲身体验很少,但人工智能目前已在不同领域被广泛接受。这些见解可以为关心人工智能在社会中普及的政策制定者和利益相关者提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes, experiences, and usage intentions of artificial intelligence: A population study in Germany
Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly affects individuals’ private and professional lives. Importantly, both the acceptance and adoption of new AI technologies in society is heavily impacted by the attitudes that people hold; yet, there is currently limited information on how people perceive and intend to use AI at the national and demographic levels. Therefore, this study examined a random sample of 1,098 German adults to assess their attitudes, experiences, and usage intentions regarding AI in work, healthcare, and education. The findings indicated that respondents generally held favorable attitudes towards AI, with AI applications in healthcare receiving more positive evaluations than AI in the context of work. Moreover, cognitive evaluations of AI were more positive than emotional or behavioral appraisals. Prior experiences with AI were, however, limited, particularly in healthcare and education. Demographic differences were generally small. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that, in Germany, AI is currently widely accepted in different domains, although most people have little first-hand experience with it. These insights can inform policymakers and stakeholders who care about the proliferation of AI in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信