Minna Ikävalko , Anna Widlund , Jaana Viljaranta , Rebecca Lazarides , Matthew C. Lambert , Erkko T. Sointu
{"title":"小学生自我调节效能的来源转换及其与自我调节效能的关系","authors":"Minna Ikävalko , Anna Widlund , Jaana Viljaranta , Rebecca Lazarides , Matthew C. Lambert , Erkko T. Sointu","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated stability and changes in primary school students' (N = 345) profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources including mastery and vicarious experience, social persuasion, and psychological and emotional arousal within one school year, and how profile memberships associate with gender, support for learning, and self-regulatory efficacy. Latent profile and transition analyses identified four profiles among students: <em>Highly positive</em>, <em>Average</em>, <em>Stressed</em>, and <em>Highly positive but stressed</em>. All profiles showed stability during the school year, yet some students transitioned into more maladaptive profiles. Gender was significantly associated with some profile memberships and transitions, while support for learning was not. Students who remained <em>Highly positive</em> showed higher self-regulatory efficacy, while students remaining in profiles showing stress reported lower levels of self-regulatory efficacy. Additionally, transitioning to a more maladaptive profile within the school year was related to lower self-regulatory efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>This study identified four different profiles among primary school students based on their self-regulatory efficacy sources: <em>Highly positive</em>, <em>Average</em>, <em>Stressed</em>, and <em>Highly positive but stressed</em>. Most students showed a positive combination of self-regulatory efficacy sources, but some students' profiles were more maladaptive, characterized by relatively high levels of stress. While most of the students remained in their initial profile during the school year, some transitions into maladaptive profiles did occur. These stabilities and transitions, in general, predicted students' self-regulatory efficacy, so that students showing more positive and stable profiles reported higher self-regulatory efficacy, whereas students belonging or transitioning to more stressed profiles reported lower self-regulatory efficacy. These findings suggest that experiencing stress may be harmful for student's self-efficacy, even when they otherwise have positive bases (that is, sources) for self-efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102675"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary school students' profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources—Transitions and association with self-regulatory efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Minna Ikävalko , Anna Widlund , Jaana Viljaranta , Rebecca Lazarides , Matthew C. Lambert , Erkko T. Sointu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated stability and changes in primary school students' (N = 345) profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources including mastery and vicarious experience, social persuasion, and psychological and emotional arousal within one school year, and how profile memberships associate with gender, support for learning, and self-regulatory efficacy. Latent profile and transition analyses identified four profiles among students: <em>Highly positive</em>, <em>Average</em>, <em>Stressed</em>, and <em>Highly positive but stressed</em>. All profiles showed stability during the school year, yet some students transitioned into more maladaptive profiles. Gender was significantly associated with some profile memberships and transitions, while support for learning was not. Students who remained <em>Highly positive</em> showed higher self-regulatory efficacy, while students remaining in profiles showing stress reported lower levels of self-regulatory efficacy. Additionally, transitioning to a more maladaptive profile within the school year was related to lower self-regulatory efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications statement</h3><div>This study identified four different profiles among primary school students based on their self-regulatory efficacy sources: <em>Highly positive</em>, <em>Average</em>, <em>Stressed</em>, and <em>Highly positive but stressed</em>. Most students showed a positive combination of self-regulatory efficacy sources, but some students' profiles were more maladaptive, characterized by relatively high levels of stress. While most of the students remained in their initial profile during the school year, some transitions into maladaptive profiles did occur. These stabilities and transitions, in general, predicted students' self-regulatory efficacy, so that students showing more positive and stable profiles reported higher self-regulatory efficacy, whereas students belonging or transitioning to more stressed profiles reported lower self-regulatory efficacy. These findings suggest that experiencing stress may be harmful for student's self-efficacy, even when they otherwise have positive bases (that is, sources) for self-efficacy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000512\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025000512","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Primary school students' profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources—Transitions and association with self-regulatory efficacy
This study investigated stability and changes in primary school students' (N = 345) profiles of self-regulatory efficacy sources including mastery and vicarious experience, social persuasion, and psychological and emotional arousal within one school year, and how profile memberships associate with gender, support for learning, and self-regulatory efficacy. Latent profile and transition analyses identified four profiles among students: Highly positive, Average, Stressed, and Highly positive but stressed. All profiles showed stability during the school year, yet some students transitioned into more maladaptive profiles. Gender was significantly associated with some profile memberships and transitions, while support for learning was not. Students who remained Highly positive showed higher self-regulatory efficacy, while students remaining in profiles showing stress reported lower levels of self-regulatory efficacy. Additionally, transitioning to a more maladaptive profile within the school year was related to lower self-regulatory efficacy.
Educational relevance and implications statement
This study identified four different profiles among primary school students based on their self-regulatory efficacy sources: Highly positive, Average, Stressed, and Highly positive but stressed. Most students showed a positive combination of self-regulatory efficacy sources, but some students' profiles were more maladaptive, characterized by relatively high levels of stress. While most of the students remained in their initial profile during the school year, some transitions into maladaptive profiles did occur. These stabilities and transitions, in general, predicted students' self-regulatory efficacy, so that students showing more positive and stable profiles reported higher self-regulatory efficacy, whereas students belonging or transitioning to more stressed profiles reported lower self-regulatory efficacy. These findings suggest that experiencing stress may be harmful for student's self-efficacy, even when they otherwise have positive bases (that is, sources) for self-efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).