Omer Ilan, Amit Perlin, Ido Peles, Itamar Ben Shitrit, Lior Fuchs
{"title":"自主学习与指导心脏超声训练的比较评价。","authors":"Omer Ilan, Amit Perlin, Ido Peles, Itamar Ben Shitrit, Lior Fuchs","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) has improved the diagnostic capacity of medical conditions; however, integrating it into medical curricula is constrained by cost, time, accessibility, and teaching style variability. This study examines whether simulator-based self-learning for cardiac PoCUS is noninferior to instructor-guided teaching.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized controlled trial, conducted at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, enrolled 116 medical students as part of the medical school's PoCUS curriculum. Participants were randomly assigned to a simulator-based self-learning or conventional instructor-guided teaching group. After training, which took place January 29 to February 22, 2023, participants completed exams on February 23, 2023, assessing their abilities to obtain specific cardiac views, capture images of quality, and correctly identify common cardiac pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 116 participants, 57 (49.1%) were categorized into the instructor-guided group and 59 (50.9%) the self-learning group. Participants in the self-learning group had higher total test scores compared with the instructor-guided group (81.6% vs 77.2%, P = .30), with only the apical 2-chamber view reaching statistical significance in favor of the self-learning group (81.3% vs 68.3%, P = .04). The self-learning group also scored higher on image quality, but the difference was not statistically significant (59.5% vs 55.6%, P = .26). There was no significant difference in total scores for cardiac pathology identification (93.5% in the self-learning group vs 94.7% in the instructor-guided group, P = .81). A multivariable logistic regression presented no significant difference in achieving an above median score when adjusted for gender, chest anatomy academic grade, and prior PoCUS training (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.69-3.53; P = .30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the self-learning approach is noninferior to instructor-guided teaching for cardiac ultrasonography training. Incorporating these programs into medical curricula may enhance the quantity and proficiency of PoCUS operators, improving diagnostic capabilities and treatment outcomes across medical specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Self-Learning Versus Instructor-Guided Cardiac Ultrasonography Training.\",\"authors\":\"Omer Ilan, Amit Perlin, Ido Peles, Itamar Ben Shitrit, Lior Fuchs\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) has improved the diagnostic capacity of medical conditions; however, integrating it into medical curricula is constrained by cost, time, accessibility, and teaching style variability. This study examines whether simulator-based self-learning for cardiac PoCUS is noninferior to instructor-guided teaching.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This randomized controlled trial, conducted at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, enrolled 116 medical students as part of the medical school's PoCUS curriculum. Participants were randomly assigned to a simulator-based self-learning or conventional instructor-guided teaching group. After training, which took place January 29 to February 22, 2023, participants completed exams on February 23, 2023, assessing their abilities to obtain specific cardiac views, capture images of quality, and correctly identify common cardiac pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 116 participants, 57 (49.1%) were categorized into the instructor-guided group and 59 (50.9%) the self-learning group. Participants in the self-learning group had higher total test scores compared with the instructor-guided group (81.6% vs 77.2%, P = .30), with only the apical 2-chamber view reaching statistical significance in favor of the self-learning group (81.3% vs 68.3%, P = .04). The self-learning group also scored higher on image quality, but the difference was not statistically significant (59.5% vs 55.6%, P = .26). There was no significant difference in total scores for cardiac pathology identification (93.5% in the self-learning group vs 94.7% in the instructor-guided group, P = .81). A multivariable logistic regression presented no significant difference in achieving an above median score when adjusted for gender, chest anatomy academic grade, and prior PoCUS training (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.69-3.53; P = .30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the self-learning approach is noninferior to instructor-guided teaching for cardiac ultrasonography training. Incorporating these programs into medical curricula may enhance the quantity and proficiency of PoCUS operators, improving diagnostic capabilities and treatment outcomes across medical specialties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:点位超声(PoCUS)提高了对疾病的诊断能力;然而,将其纳入医学课程受到成本、时间、可及性和教学风格可变性的限制。本研究探讨基于模拟器的心脏PoCUS自主学习是否优于讲师指导教学。方法:这项随机对照试验在内盖夫本古里安大学进行,招募了116名医学生作为医学院PoCUS课程的一部分。参与者被随机分配到基于模拟器的自学组或传统的教师指导教学组。培训于2023年1月29日至2月22日进行,培训结束后,参与者于2023年2月23日完成了测试,评估他们获得特定心脏视图、捕获质量图像和正确识别常见心脏病变的能力。结果:116名被试中,教师引导组57人(49.1%),自主学习组59人(50.9%)。自主学习组的总测试成绩高于教师指导组(81.6%比77.2%,P = 0.30),只有尖顶2室观较自主学习组有统计学意义(81.3%比68.3%,P = 0.04)。自主学习组在图像质量方面得分也较高,但差异无统计学意义(59.5% vs 55.6%, P = 0.26)。两组在心脏病理鉴定总分上的差异无统计学意义(自主学习组93.5% vs教师指导组94.7%,P = 0.81)。多变量logistic回归显示,在性别、胸部解剖学成绩和既往PoCUS培训等因素调整后,获得中位以上评分的差异无统计学意义(校正优势比为1.55;95% ci, 0.69-3.53;P = .30)。结论:本研究表明,在心脏超声训练中,自主学习的方法不逊色于教师指导教学。将这些课程纳入医学课程可以提高PoCUS操作员的数量和熟练程度,提高医学专业的诊断能力和治疗效果。
Comparative Evaluation of Self-Learning Versus Instructor-Guided Cardiac Ultrasonography Training.
Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) has improved the diagnostic capacity of medical conditions; however, integrating it into medical curricula is constrained by cost, time, accessibility, and teaching style variability. This study examines whether simulator-based self-learning for cardiac PoCUS is noninferior to instructor-guided teaching.
Method: This randomized controlled trial, conducted at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, enrolled 116 medical students as part of the medical school's PoCUS curriculum. Participants were randomly assigned to a simulator-based self-learning or conventional instructor-guided teaching group. After training, which took place January 29 to February 22, 2023, participants completed exams on February 23, 2023, assessing their abilities to obtain specific cardiac views, capture images of quality, and correctly identify common cardiac pathologies.
Results: Of 116 participants, 57 (49.1%) were categorized into the instructor-guided group and 59 (50.9%) the self-learning group. Participants in the self-learning group had higher total test scores compared with the instructor-guided group (81.6% vs 77.2%, P = .30), with only the apical 2-chamber view reaching statistical significance in favor of the self-learning group (81.3% vs 68.3%, P = .04). The self-learning group also scored higher on image quality, but the difference was not statistically significant (59.5% vs 55.6%, P = .26). There was no significant difference in total scores for cardiac pathology identification (93.5% in the self-learning group vs 94.7% in the instructor-guided group, P = .81). A multivariable logistic regression presented no significant difference in achieving an above median score when adjusted for gender, chest anatomy academic grade, and prior PoCUS training (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.69-3.53; P = .30).
Conclusions: This study suggests that the self-learning approach is noninferior to instructor-guided teaching for cardiac ultrasonography training. Incorporating these programs into medical curricula may enhance the quantity and proficiency of PoCUS operators, improving diagnostic capabilities and treatment outcomes across medical specialties.
期刊介绍:
Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.