也门成人上颌前恒牙根冠比的CBCT研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Salah A Alhaidary, Khaled A Al-Haddad, Ghamdan A Al-Harazi, Mohammed H Mashyakhy, Samar S Adlan, Abdulaziz S Abu-Melha
{"title":"也门成人上颌前恒牙根冠比的CBCT研究。","authors":"Salah A Alhaidary, Khaled A Al-Haddad, Ghamdan A Al-Harazi, Mohammed H Mashyakhy, Samar S Adlan, Abdulaziz S Abu-Melha","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the root-crown ratio (RCR) of maxillary and mandibular anterior permanent teeth from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired from a sample of Yemeni adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective radiographic observational cross-sectional study. The study included 233 CBCTs. Root length, crown length, and RCR of all anterior teeth were measured using Ez-3Di software. Factors considered for correlation included gender differences, skeletal classifications (class I, II, and III), overjet (OJ), and overbite (OB). The data were entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Significance was set at a value of <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean RCR of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth ranged between 1.2 and 1.3 for central incisors, 1.3 and 1.4 for lateral incisors, and 1.5 and 1.6 for canines. The length of roots and crowns was generally greater in males, except for the mean crown length of the left mandibular central incisor. Class III participants exhibited the longest root length for maxillary and mandibular canines, 15.75 and 14.7 mm, respectively, compared with class I and II participants. Participants with increased OJ (>4 mm) showed the lowest root and crown lengths in all canines and lateral incisors while displaying the highest root length in all central incisors. However, no statistically significant variances were observed in root length and the RCR (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Those with a deep bite had the longest roots for maxillary lateral and central incisors and the shortest roots for maxillary canines. In contrast, participants with an open bite displayed the opposite measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender differences in RCR were insignificant except for the mandibular right central incisor. No significant differences were observed among the three skeletal classes in all study parameters. Furthermore, RCR variations based on OJ and OB were not statistically significant, except for the mandibular left lateral incisor in relation to OB.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Understanding RCR variations supports clinicians in treatment planning, especially in anchorage selection, force application, and predicting treatment outcomes. This knowledge is important for minimizing potential complications and improving treatment effectiveness in various orthodontic cases. How to cite this article: Alhaidary SA, Al-Haddad KA, Al-Harazi GA, <i>et al</i>. Root-crown Ratio of Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Permanent Teeth in Yemeni Adults using CBCT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1118-1126.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 12","pages":"1118-1126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Root-crown Ratio of Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Permanent Teeth in Yemeni Adults using CBCT.\",\"authors\":\"Salah A Alhaidary, Khaled A Al-Haddad, Ghamdan A Al-Harazi, Mohammed H Mashyakhy, Samar S Adlan, Abdulaziz S Abu-Melha\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the root-crown ratio (RCR) of maxillary and mandibular anterior permanent teeth from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired from a sample of Yemeni adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective radiographic observational cross-sectional study. The study included 233 CBCTs. Root length, crown length, and RCR of all anterior teeth were measured using Ez-3Di software. Factors considered for correlation included gender differences, skeletal classifications (class I, II, and III), overjet (OJ), and overbite (OB). The data were entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Significance was set at a value of <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean RCR of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth ranged between 1.2 and 1.3 for central incisors, 1.3 and 1.4 for lateral incisors, and 1.5 and 1.6 for canines. The length of roots and crowns was generally greater in males, except for the mean crown length of the left mandibular central incisor. Class III participants exhibited the longest root length for maxillary and mandibular canines, 15.75 and 14.7 mm, respectively, compared with class I and II participants. Participants with increased OJ (>4 mm) showed the lowest root and crown lengths in all canines and lateral incisors while displaying the highest root length in all central incisors. However, no statistically significant variances were observed in root length and the RCR (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Those with a deep bite had the longest roots for maxillary lateral and central incisors and the shortest roots for maxillary canines. In contrast, participants with an open bite displayed the opposite measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gender differences in RCR were insignificant except for the mandibular right central incisor. No significant differences were observed among the three skeletal classes in all study parameters. Furthermore, RCR variations based on OJ and OB were not statistically significant, except for the mandibular left lateral incisor in relation to OB.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Understanding RCR variations supports clinicians in treatment planning, especially in anchorage selection, force application, and predicting treatment outcomes. This knowledge is important for minimizing potential complications and improving treatment effectiveness in various orthodontic cases. How to cite this article: Alhaidary SA, Al-Haddad KA, Al-Harazi GA, <i>et al</i>. Root-crown Ratio of Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Permanent Teeth in Yemeni Adults using CBCT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1118-1126.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"1118-1126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用也门成年人的锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估上颌和下颌前恒牙的根冠比(RCR)。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性放射观察横断面研究。该研究包括233例cbct。采用Ez-3Di软件测量所有前牙的根长、冠长和RCR。考虑相关性的因素包括性别差异、骨骼分类(I类、II类和III类)、复喷(OJ)和复咬合(OB)。数据输入和分析使用统计软件包的社会科学软件。p < 0.05为显著性。结果:上颌前牙中切牙的平均RCR为1.2 ~ 1.3,侧切牙的平均RCR为1.3 ~ 1.4,犬科的平均RCR为1.5 ~ 1.6。除了左下颌中切牙的平均冠长外,男性的根冠长度普遍大于男性。与I类和II类受试者相比,III类受试者上颌和下颌的牙根长度最长,分别为15.75和14.7 mm。OJ增加(bbbb4 mm)的参与者在所有犬齿和侧门牙中显示出最低的根和冠长度,而在所有中门牙中显示出最高的根长度。根长和RCR差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。深咬者上颌侧切和中切牙根最长,上颌犬根最短。相比之下,咬开的参与者显示出相反的测量结果。结论:除下颌骨右中切牙外,RCR的性别差异不显著。在所有研究参数中,三个骨骼类别之间没有观察到显著差异。此外,除了下颌左侧切牙与OB相关外,基于OJ和OB的RCR变化无统计学意义。临床意义:了解RCR变化有助于临床医生制定治疗计划,特别是在支抗选择,力应用和预测治疗结果方面。这些知识对于减少潜在的并发症和提高各种正畸病例的治疗效果是重要的。如何引用本文:Alhaidary SA, al - haddad KA, al - harazi GA等。也门成人上颌前恒牙根冠比的CBCT研究。[J]现代医学学报;2009;25(12):1118-1126。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Root-crown Ratio of Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Permanent Teeth in Yemeni Adults using CBCT.

Aim: To assess the root-crown ratio (RCR) of maxillary and mandibular anterior permanent teeth from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquired from a sample of Yemeni adults.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective radiographic observational cross-sectional study. The study included 233 CBCTs. Root length, crown length, and RCR of all anterior teeth were measured using Ez-3Di software. Factors considered for correlation included gender differences, skeletal classifications (class I, II, and III), overjet (OJ), and overbite (OB). The data were entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Significance was set at a value of p < 0.05.

Results: Mean RCR of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth ranged between 1.2 and 1.3 for central incisors, 1.3 and 1.4 for lateral incisors, and 1.5 and 1.6 for canines. The length of roots and crowns was generally greater in males, except for the mean crown length of the left mandibular central incisor. Class III participants exhibited the longest root length for maxillary and mandibular canines, 15.75 and 14.7 mm, respectively, compared with class I and II participants. Participants with increased OJ (>4 mm) showed the lowest root and crown lengths in all canines and lateral incisors while displaying the highest root length in all central incisors. However, no statistically significant variances were observed in root length and the RCR (p > 0.05). Those with a deep bite had the longest roots for maxillary lateral and central incisors and the shortest roots for maxillary canines. In contrast, participants with an open bite displayed the opposite measurements.

Conclusions: Gender differences in RCR were insignificant except for the mandibular right central incisor. No significant differences were observed among the three skeletal classes in all study parameters. Furthermore, RCR variations based on OJ and OB were not statistically significant, except for the mandibular left lateral incisor in relation to OB.

Clinical significance: Understanding RCR variations supports clinicians in treatment planning, especially in anchorage selection, force application, and predicting treatment outcomes. This knowledge is important for minimizing potential complications and improving treatment effectiveness in various orthodontic cases. How to cite this article: Alhaidary SA, Al-Haddad KA, Al-Harazi GA, et al. Root-crown Ratio of Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Permanent Teeth in Yemeni Adults using CBCT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(12):1118-1126.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信