用加速度计评估24小时运动行为的方法选择:范围综述。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Bruno Rodrigues, António Videira-Silva, Luís Lopes, Eduarda Sousa-Sá, Susana Vale, Dylan P Cliff, Romeu Mendes, Rute Santos
{"title":"用加速度计评估24小时运动行为的方法选择:范围综述。","authors":"Bruno Rodrigues, António Videira-Silva, Luís Lopes, Eduarda Sousa-Sá, Susana Vale, Dylan P Cliff, Romeu Mendes, Rute Santos","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00820-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no reviews describing current measurement protocols and accelerometer processing decisions that are being used in 24-h MovBeh studies, across the lifespan. We aim to synthesise information on methods for assessing 24-h movement behaviors using accelerometry across all age groups.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE were searched until December 2022. Observational or intervention reports describing accelerometry methods in studies on combinations of movement behaviors, with a 24-h protocol across all ages, were included. This review included 102 studies: three studies in toddlers, 15 in preschoolers, 17 in children, 23 in adolescents and 44 in adults and older adults. The Actigraph GT3X was the most commonly used device; the majority of the included reports collected data for seven days, including three weekdays and one weekend day, with a ≥ 16 h/day per 24-h period for valid data. The criteria for non-wear time varied between ≥ 20 and  ≥ 90 min of consecutive zero counts, depending on the age group. The most common epoch used was 15 or 60 s for youth and adults, respectively. The choice of sleep algorithms and SB/PA cut-points, of the included reports, depended on age and the original validation/calibration study. To deal with non-compliant participants, exclusion of non-compliant participants from the analysis was most frequently used. Most studies used diaries/logs to complement the accelerometer data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerometer protocols and methodological decisions varied considerably between reports. Therefore, consensus on methodological decisions is needed to improve precision and comparability between studies, which is challenging given the complexity of the procedures, the number of available brands and types of accelerometers, and the plethora of programming options.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological Choices on 24-h Movement Behavior Assessment by Accelerometry: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Rodrigues, António Videira-Silva, Luís Lopes, Eduarda Sousa-Sá, Susana Vale, Dylan P Cliff, Romeu Mendes, Rute Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00820-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no reviews describing current measurement protocols and accelerometer processing decisions that are being used in 24-h MovBeh studies, across the lifespan. We aim to synthesise information on methods for assessing 24-h movement behaviors using accelerometry across all age groups.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE were searched until December 2022. Observational or intervention reports describing accelerometry methods in studies on combinations of movement behaviors, with a 24-h protocol across all ages, were included. This review included 102 studies: three studies in toddlers, 15 in preschoolers, 17 in children, 23 in adolescents and 44 in adults and older adults. The Actigraph GT3X was the most commonly used device; the majority of the included reports collected data for seven days, including three weekdays and one weekend day, with a ≥ 16 h/day per 24-h period for valid data. The criteria for non-wear time varied between ≥ 20 and  ≥ 90 min of consecutive zero counts, depending on the age group. The most common epoch used was 15 or 60 s for youth and adults, respectively. The choice of sleep algorithms and SB/PA cut-points, of the included reports, depended on age and the original validation/calibration study. To deal with non-compliant participants, exclusion of non-compliant participants from the analysis was most frequently used. Most studies used diaries/logs to complement the accelerometer data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerometer protocols and methodological decisions varied considerably between reports. Therefore, consensus on methodological decisions is needed to improve precision and comparability between studies, which is challenging given the complexity of the procedures, the number of available brands and types of accelerometers, and the plethora of programming options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00820-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00820-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚无综述描述24小时MovBeh研究中使用的测量方案和加速度计处理决策。我们的目标是综合所有年龄组使用加速度计评估24小时运动行为的方法信息。正文:PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE检索截止到2022年12月。包括描述运动行为组合研究中的加速度计方法的观察或干预报告,以及所有年龄段的24小时协议。这篇综述包括102项研究:3项针对幼儿的研究,15项针对学龄前儿童的研究,17项针对儿童的研究,23项针对青少年的研究,44项针对成年人和老年人的研究。Actigraph GT3X是最常用的设备;大多数纳入的报告收集了7天的数据,包括三个工作日和一个周末,有效数据每24小时≥16小时/天。根据年龄组的不同,无磨损时间的标准在连续零计数≥20到≥90分钟之间变化。年轻人和成年人最常用的年龄分别是15岁和60岁。在纳入的报告中,睡眠算法和SB/PA切点的选择取决于年龄和原始验证/校准研究。为了处理不服从的参与者,从分析中排除不服从的参与者是最常用的。大多数研究使用日记/日志来补充加速度计数据。结论:加速度计方案和方法决定在不同的报告中差异很大。因此,需要在方法决策上达成共识,以提高研究之间的准确性和可比性,考虑到程序的复杂性、可用品牌和类型的加速度计的数量以及过多的编程选择,这是具有挑战性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methodological Choices on 24-h Movement Behavior Assessment by Accelerometry: A Scoping Review.

Methodological Choices on 24-h Movement Behavior Assessment by Accelerometry: A Scoping Review.

Methodological Choices on 24-h Movement Behavior Assessment by Accelerometry: A Scoping Review.

Background: There are no reviews describing current measurement protocols and accelerometer processing decisions that are being used in 24-h MovBeh studies, across the lifespan. We aim to synthesise information on methods for assessing 24-h movement behaviors using accelerometry across all age groups.

Main body: PubMed, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and EMBASE were searched until December 2022. Observational or intervention reports describing accelerometry methods in studies on combinations of movement behaviors, with a 24-h protocol across all ages, were included. This review included 102 studies: three studies in toddlers, 15 in preschoolers, 17 in children, 23 in adolescents and 44 in adults and older adults. The Actigraph GT3X was the most commonly used device; the majority of the included reports collected data for seven days, including three weekdays and one weekend day, with a ≥ 16 h/day per 24-h period for valid data. The criteria for non-wear time varied between ≥ 20 and  ≥ 90 min of consecutive zero counts, depending on the age group. The most common epoch used was 15 or 60 s for youth and adults, respectively. The choice of sleep algorithms and SB/PA cut-points, of the included reports, depended on age and the original validation/calibration study. To deal with non-compliant participants, exclusion of non-compliant participants from the analysis was most frequently used. Most studies used diaries/logs to complement the accelerometer data.

Conclusions: Accelerometer protocols and methodological decisions varied considerably between reports. Therefore, consensus on methodological decisions is needed to improve precision and comparability between studies, which is challenging given the complexity of the procedures, the number of available brands and types of accelerometers, and the plethora of programming options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信