脑血管造影中经右肱动脉入路分离左颈内外动脉。

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Tomonori Orito, Naoya Imai, Takamasa Kinoshita, Shigenobu Sawada, Katsuhiko Hayashi
{"title":"脑血管造影中经右肱动脉入路分离左颈内外动脉。","authors":"Tomonori Orito, Naoya Imai, Takamasa Kinoshita, Shigenobu Sawada, Katsuhiko Hayashi","doi":"10.1177/19714009251324300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral angiography is essential for diagnosing cerebrovascular diseases and crucial to separate the internal and external carotid arteries during angiography. The femoral artery approach is more invasive than the brachial artery approach. In some cases, guiding the catheter through the right brachial artery to the left internal and external carotid arteries is feasible. This study retrospectively investigated factors influencing successful catheter guidance to the left carotid arteries. We studied 30 patients (17 men; mean age 64.9 years) in whom catheter guidance to the left internal and external carotid arteries was attempted via the right brachial artery. A 4Fr Simmons-type catheter and a 0.035-inch diameter guidewire were used. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics and aortic arch anatomy. Guidance was successful in 20 patients (66.7%). There were no significant differences in sex, age, height, weight, BMI, aorta type, or bifurcation type between the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries between the successful and unsuccessful cases. However, a significant difference was observed in the angle formed by the Simmons catheter during insertion into the left common carotid artery (45.7° vs 19.3° <i>p</i> < .01). The rising angles of the catheter entering the aortic arch from the brachiocephalic artery were 64.2° versus 84.8°, respectively (<i>p</i> < .01). Cut-off values were 30.9° (AUC = 0.985) and 77.5° (AUC = 0.9). Safe guidance to the left internal and external carotid arteries was achievable when the angle of the Simmons catheter curve was 30.9° or greater and the rising angle of the catheter entering the aortic arch from the brachiocephalic artery was 77.5° or less.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009251324300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Separation of left internal and external carotid arteries via right brachial artery approach in cerebral angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Tomonori Orito, Naoya Imai, Takamasa Kinoshita, Shigenobu Sawada, Katsuhiko Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19714009251324300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cerebral angiography is essential for diagnosing cerebrovascular diseases and crucial to separate the internal and external carotid arteries during angiography. The femoral artery approach is more invasive than the brachial artery approach. In some cases, guiding the catheter through the right brachial artery to the left internal and external carotid arteries is feasible. This study retrospectively investigated factors influencing successful catheter guidance to the left carotid arteries. We studied 30 patients (17 men; mean age 64.9 years) in whom catheter guidance to the left internal and external carotid arteries was attempted via the right brachial artery. A 4Fr Simmons-type catheter and a 0.035-inch diameter guidewire were used. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics and aortic arch anatomy. Guidance was successful in 20 patients (66.7%). There were no significant differences in sex, age, height, weight, BMI, aorta type, or bifurcation type between the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries between the successful and unsuccessful cases. However, a significant difference was observed in the angle formed by the Simmons catheter during insertion into the left common carotid artery (45.7° vs 19.3° <i>p</i> < .01). The rising angles of the catheter entering the aortic arch from the brachiocephalic artery were 64.2° versus 84.8°, respectively (<i>p</i> < .01). Cut-off values were 30.9° (AUC = 0.985) and 77.5° (AUC = 0.9). Safe guidance to the left internal and external carotid arteries was achievable when the angle of the Simmons catheter curve was 30.9° or greater and the rising angle of the catheter entering the aortic arch from the brachiocephalic artery was 77.5° or less.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19714009251324300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251324300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251324300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑血管造影是诊断脑血管疾病的重要手段,在脑血管造影中分离颈内动脉和颈外动脉至关重要。股动脉入路比肱动脉入路更具侵入性。在某些情况下,引导导管通过右肱动脉到达左颈内外动脉是可行的。本研究回顾性研究影响导管成功引导至左侧颈动脉的因素。我们研究了30例患者(17例男性;平均年龄64.9岁),经右肱动脉插管至左颈内外动脉。使用4Fr simons型导管和直径0.035英寸的导丝。我们回顾性分析了患者的特征和主动脉弓解剖。20例(66.7%)患者指导成功。成功与不成功患者在性别、年龄、身高、体重、BMI、主动脉类型、头臂动脉与左颈总动脉分叉类型等方面均无显著差异。然而,Simmons导管插入左颈总动脉时形成的角度有显著差异(45.7°vs 19.3°p < 0.01)。导管从头臂动脉进入主动脉弓的上升角分别为64.2°和84.8°(p < 0.01)。临界值分别为30.9°(AUC = 0.985)和77.5°(AUC = 0.9)。当Simmons导管曲线角度大于或等于30.9°,导管从头臂动脉进入主动脉弓的上升角度小于或等于77.5°时,可以安全引导左颈内外动脉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Separation of left internal and external carotid arteries via right brachial artery approach in cerebral angiography.

Cerebral angiography is essential for diagnosing cerebrovascular diseases and crucial to separate the internal and external carotid arteries during angiography. The femoral artery approach is more invasive than the brachial artery approach. In some cases, guiding the catheter through the right brachial artery to the left internal and external carotid arteries is feasible. This study retrospectively investigated factors influencing successful catheter guidance to the left carotid arteries. We studied 30 patients (17 men; mean age 64.9 years) in whom catheter guidance to the left internal and external carotid arteries was attempted via the right brachial artery. A 4Fr Simmons-type catheter and a 0.035-inch diameter guidewire were used. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics and aortic arch anatomy. Guidance was successful in 20 patients (66.7%). There were no significant differences in sex, age, height, weight, BMI, aorta type, or bifurcation type between the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries between the successful and unsuccessful cases. However, a significant difference was observed in the angle formed by the Simmons catheter during insertion into the left common carotid artery (45.7° vs 19.3° p < .01). The rising angles of the catheter entering the aortic arch from the brachiocephalic artery were 64.2° versus 84.8°, respectively (p < .01). Cut-off values were 30.9° (AUC = 0.985) and 77.5° (AUC = 0.9). Safe guidance to the left internal and external carotid arteries was achievable when the angle of the Simmons catheter curve was 30.9° or greater and the rising angle of the catheter entering the aortic arch from the brachiocephalic artery was 77.5° or less.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信