{"title":"对坏事感觉良好对以负面为主的压力进行积极评价。","authors":"Christian E Waugh, Marquis Schieber, Yifang Zhao","doi":"10.1037/emo0001517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People often experience positive emotions during predominantly negative stressors, and we hypothesize that one way this occurs is that people make positive appraisals of some elements of the stressors. Further, we hypothesized that people can use these positive appraisals to spontaneously and/or strategically regulate their stress responses. In several studies with online and subject pool convenience samples, participants were able to generate unambiguously positive appraisals (as defined in pilot Studies 2 and 3) of elements of predominantly negative stressors both when instructed to generate positive appraisals (Study 1) and when instructed to just list elements of their stressors with no instruction on what valence they should be (Studies 3-6). Further, just generating these positive appraisals helped participants feel better about a prolonged life stressor (Studies 4 and 6) and an acute laboratory stressor (Study 5). We successfully distinguished the emotion regulation strategy of positive \"up-appraisal\" (elaborating and focusing on positive appraisals) from that of positive \"alt-appraisal\" (reframing and changing a negative appraisal to be more positive) and showed that positive up-appraisal was more effective at improving stress-related emotions (Studies 1 and 4). Last, individual differences in positivity and negative emotionality were the most reliable predictors of generating positive appraisals of stressors. These studies demonstrate that sometimes, people can cope successfully with stressors because they are able to separate elements of that stressor, recognize that some of those elements are positive, and then elaborate and focus on those positive appraisals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1381-1399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeling good about the bad: Making positive appraisals of predominantly negative stressors.\",\"authors\":\"Christian E Waugh, Marquis Schieber, Yifang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/emo0001517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People often experience positive emotions during predominantly negative stressors, and we hypothesize that one way this occurs is that people make positive appraisals of some elements of the stressors. Further, we hypothesized that people can use these positive appraisals to spontaneously and/or strategically regulate their stress responses. In several studies with online and subject pool convenience samples, participants were able to generate unambiguously positive appraisals (as defined in pilot Studies 2 and 3) of elements of predominantly negative stressors both when instructed to generate positive appraisals (Study 1) and when instructed to just list elements of their stressors with no instruction on what valence they should be (Studies 3-6). Further, just generating these positive appraisals helped participants feel better about a prolonged life stressor (Studies 4 and 6) and an acute laboratory stressor (Study 5). We successfully distinguished the emotion regulation strategy of positive \\\"up-appraisal\\\" (elaborating and focusing on positive appraisals) from that of positive \\\"alt-appraisal\\\" (reframing and changing a negative appraisal to be more positive) and showed that positive up-appraisal was more effective at improving stress-related emotions (Studies 1 and 4). Last, individual differences in positivity and negative emotionality were the most reliable predictors of generating positive appraisals of stressors. These studies demonstrate that sometimes, people can cope successfully with stressors because they are able to separate elements of that stressor, recognize that some of those elements are positive, and then elaborate and focus on those positive appraisals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1381-1399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001517\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人们通常在消极的压力源中体验到积极的情绪,我们假设这种情况发生的一种方式是人们对压力源的某些因素做出了积极的评价。此外,我们假设人们可以使用这些积极的评价来自发地和/或战略性地调节他们的压力反应。在几项使用在线和受试者池便利样本的研究中,参与者能够对主要为负的压力源的元素产生明确的积极评价(如试点研究2和3中定义的那样),无论是在指示下产生积极评价(研究1),还是在指示下只列出压力源的元素而没有指示它们应该是什么价时(研究3-6)。此外,仅仅产生这些积极的评价就能帮助参与者对长期生活压力源(研究4和6)和急性实验室压力源(研究5)感觉更好。我们成功区分了积极的“上评价”(阐述和关注积极的评价)和积极的“替代评价”(重构和改变消极的评价)的情绪调节策略,并表明积极的上评价在改善压力相关方面更有效情绪(研究1和4)。最后,积极情绪和消极情绪的个体差异是对压力源产生积极评价的最可靠预测因素。这些研究表明,有时候,人们可以成功地应对压力源因为他们能够分离压力源的元素,认识到其中一些元素是积极的,然后详细阐述并专注于这些积极的评价。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Feeling good about the bad: Making positive appraisals of predominantly negative stressors.
People often experience positive emotions during predominantly negative stressors, and we hypothesize that one way this occurs is that people make positive appraisals of some elements of the stressors. Further, we hypothesized that people can use these positive appraisals to spontaneously and/or strategically regulate their stress responses. In several studies with online and subject pool convenience samples, participants were able to generate unambiguously positive appraisals (as defined in pilot Studies 2 and 3) of elements of predominantly negative stressors both when instructed to generate positive appraisals (Study 1) and when instructed to just list elements of their stressors with no instruction on what valence they should be (Studies 3-6). Further, just generating these positive appraisals helped participants feel better about a prolonged life stressor (Studies 4 and 6) and an acute laboratory stressor (Study 5). We successfully distinguished the emotion regulation strategy of positive "up-appraisal" (elaborating and focusing on positive appraisals) from that of positive "alt-appraisal" (reframing and changing a negative appraisal to be more positive) and showed that positive up-appraisal was more effective at improving stress-related emotions (Studies 1 and 4). Last, individual differences in positivity and negative emotionality were the most reliable predictors of generating positive appraisals of stressors. These studies demonstrate that sometimes, people can cope successfully with stressors because they are able to separate elements of that stressor, recognize that some of those elements are positive, and then elaborate and focus on those positive appraisals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.