评估大规模创伤后应激障碍治疗的症状改变:DSM-5中过去一天创伤后应激障碍检查表的心理测量评估。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Erika M Roberge, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Craig J Bryan, Philip Held, Sheila A M Rauch, Barbara O Rothbaum
{"title":"评估大规模创伤后应激障碍治疗的症状改变:DSM-5中过去一天创伤后应激障碍检查表的心理测量评估。","authors":"Erika M Roberge, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Craig J Bryan, Philip Held, Sheila A M Rauch, Barbara O Rothbaum","doi":"10.1037/tra0001864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Massed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments, in which therapy is provided 3 days a week to multiple times a day, have become increasingly popular and implemented in various care settings since 2010. Existing assessment methods to monitor PTSD symptom change to inform clinical decision making and treatment benefit have not been adapted to this accelerated care model, causing significant clinical and statistical challenges. This study evaluates an intuitive solution to this problem by examining the psychometric properties of a Past Day version of the widely used PTSD Checklist for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,</i> fifth edition (PCL-5).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the present study, we present findings from four massed PTSD treatment sites (N = 222) that used the Past Day PCL-5 to assess PTSD symptoms over the past day at each treatment appointment. Psychometric properties of the Past Day PCL-5 (i.e., internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and convergent validity) were analyzed by comparing the Past Day PCL-5 to Past Week and Past Month versions of the PCL-5, as well as the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent psychometric support for the Past Day PCL-5 was observed across sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide initial support for use of the Past Day PCL-5 in monitoring symptom change in the context of massed PTSD treatment. Limitations of the current data and recommendations for extension of this work are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing symptom change in massed PTSD treatments: Psychometric evaluation of the past day posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5.\",\"authors\":\"Erika M Roberge, Jennifer Schuster Wachen, Craig J Bryan, Philip Held, Sheila A M Rauch, Barbara O Rothbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Massed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments, in which therapy is provided 3 days a week to multiple times a day, have become increasingly popular and implemented in various care settings since 2010. Existing assessment methods to monitor PTSD symptom change to inform clinical decision making and treatment benefit have not been adapted to this accelerated care model, causing significant clinical and statistical challenges. This study evaluates an intuitive solution to this problem by examining the psychometric properties of a Past Day version of the widely used PTSD Checklist for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,</i> fifth edition (PCL-5).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In the present study, we present findings from four massed PTSD treatment sites (N = 222) that used the Past Day PCL-5 to assess PTSD symptoms over the past day at each treatment appointment. Psychometric properties of the Past Day PCL-5 (i.e., internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and convergent validity) were analyzed by comparing the Past Day PCL-5 to Past Week and Past Month versions of the PCL-5, as well as the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i>, fifth edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent psychometric support for the Past Day PCL-5 was observed across sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide initial support for use of the Past Day PCL-5 in monitoring symptom change in the context of massed PTSD treatment. Limitations of the current data and recommendations for extension of this work are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001864\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自 2010 年以来,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的大规模治疗(即每周治疗 3 天到每天治疗多次)在各种医疗机构中日益流行和实施。现有的用于监测创伤后应激障碍症状变化以指导临床决策和治疗效益的评估方法尚未适应这种加速护理模式,这给临床和统计工作带来了巨大挑战。本研究通过检查广泛使用的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-5)过去一天版本的心理测量特性,评估了这一问题的直观解决方案:在本研究中,我们介绍了四个大规模创伤后应激障碍治疗点(N = 222)的研究结果,这些治疗点在每次治疗预约时使用过去一天 PCL-5 评估过去一天的创伤后应激障碍症状。通过将 "过去一天 PCL-5 "与 "过去一周 PCL-5"、"过去一月 PCL-5 "以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的 "临床医师管理创伤后应激障碍量表 "进行比较,分析了 "过去一天 PCL-5 "的心理测量特性(即内部一致性、测试-再测可靠性、对变化的敏感性和收敛有效性):结果:在不同地点观察到的过去一天 PCL-5 心理测量学结果一致:这些研究结果为在大规模创伤后应激障碍治疗中使用 PCL-5 监测症状变化提供了初步支持。本文还讨论了当前数据的局限性以及推广这项工作的建议。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing symptom change in massed PTSD treatments: Psychometric evaluation of the past day posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5.

Objective: Massed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments, in which therapy is provided 3 days a week to multiple times a day, have become increasingly popular and implemented in various care settings since 2010. Existing assessment methods to monitor PTSD symptom change to inform clinical decision making and treatment benefit have not been adapted to this accelerated care model, causing significant clinical and statistical challenges. This study evaluates an intuitive solution to this problem by examining the psychometric properties of a Past Day version of the widely used PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (PCL-5).

Method: In the present study, we present findings from four massed PTSD treatment sites (N = 222) that used the Past Day PCL-5 to assess PTSD symptoms over the past day at each treatment appointment. Psychometric properties of the Past Day PCL-5 (i.e., internal consistency, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and convergent validity) were analyzed by comparing the Past Day PCL-5 to Past Week and Past Month versions of the PCL-5, as well as the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition.

Results: Consistent psychometric support for the Past Day PCL-5 was observed across sites.

Conclusions: These findings provide initial support for use of the Past Day PCL-5 in monitoring symptom change in the context of massed PTSD treatment. Limitations of the current data and recommendations for extension of this work are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信