行为变异性额颞叶痴呆的神经精神症状聚集并随时间波动。

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christopher B Morrow, Vidyulata Kamath, Bradford C Dickerson, Mark Eldaief, Neguine Rezaii, Bonnie Wong, Scott McGinnis, Ryan Darby, Adam M Staffaroni, Maria I Lapid, Belen Pascual, Julio C Rojas, Joseph C Masdeu, Kyrana Tsapkini, Edward D Huey, Daniel W Fisher, Alexander Pantelyat, Akshata Balaji, Eric Sah, Irene Litvan, Katya Rascovsky, Nupur Ghoshal, Kimiko Domoto-Reilly, John Kornak, Chiadi U Onyike
{"title":"行为变异性额颞叶痴呆的神经精神症状聚集并随时间波动。","authors":"Christopher B Morrow, Vidyulata Kamath, Bradford C Dickerson, Mark Eldaief, Neguine Rezaii, Bonnie Wong, Scott McGinnis, Ryan Darby, Adam M Staffaroni, Maria I Lapid, Belen Pascual, Julio C Rojas, Joseph C Masdeu, Kyrana Tsapkini, Edward D Huey, Daniel W Fisher, Alexander Pantelyat, Akshata Balaji, Eric Sah, Irene Litvan, Katya Rascovsky, Nupur Ghoshal, Kimiko Domoto-Reilly, John Kornak, Chiadi U Onyike","doi":"10.1111/pcn.13810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive and behavioral phenomena define behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) outside the core criteria are common throughout the illness. Identifying how NPS cluster in bvFTD may guide development of future therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 354) with sporadic and genetic bvFTD were enrolled in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium. Dementia stage was defined as early (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≤1) or advanced (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≥1). Baseline and annual follow-up visit data were analyzed to compare NPS across stages of bvFTD. Psychiatric states were captured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire and Clinician Judgment of Symptoms. Polychoric cluster analysis was used to describe NPS clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPS were highly prevalent (≥90%) in early and late bvFTD. Four NPS clusters were identified based on magnitude of factor loadings: affective, disinhibited, compulsive, and psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms fluctuated across visits. In the affective cluster, depression showed the least visit-to-visit stability. In the disinhibited cluster, elation showed the least stability. Symptoms in the psychosis and compulsive clusters (hallucinations, delusions, obsessions/compulsions, and hyperorality) were largely stable, persisting from visit-to-visit in more than 50% of cases. Symptoms in the affective and disinhibited cluster were associated with the highest caregiver burden, while symptoms in the obsessive cluster were associated with the most functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPS in bvFTD are frequent and cluster into four discrete groups. The fluctuating nature of some NPS in bvFTD suggests that they may not be reliable markers of disease progression or stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":20938,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychiatric symptoms cluster and fluctuate over time in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher B Morrow, Vidyulata Kamath, Bradford C Dickerson, Mark Eldaief, Neguine Rezaii, Bonnie Wong, Scott McGinnis, Ryan Darby, Adam M Staffaroni, Maria I Lapid, Belen Pascual, Julio C Rojas, Joseph C Masdeu, Kyrana Tsapkini, Edward D Huey, Daniel W Fisher, Alexander Pantelyat, Akshata Balaji, Eric Sah, Irene Litvan, Katya Rascovsky, Nupur Ghoshal, Kimiko Domoto-Reilly, John Kornak, Chiadi U Onyike\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pcn.13810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cognitive and behavioral phenomena define behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) outside the core criteria are common throughout the illness. Identifying how NPS cluster in bvFTD may guide development of future therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 354) with sporadic and genetic bvFTD were enrolled in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium. Dementia stage was defined as early (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≤1) or advanced (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≥1). Baseline and annual follow-up visit data were analyzed to compare NPS across stages of bvFTD. Psychiatric states were captured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire and Clinician Judgment of Symptoms. Polychoric cluster analysis was used to describe NPS clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NPS were highly prevalent (≥90%) in early and late bvFTD. Four NPS clusters were identified based on magnitude of factor loadings: affective, disinhibited, compulsive, and psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms fluctuated across visits. In the affective cluster, depression showed the least visit-to-visit stability. In the disinhibited cluster, elation showed the least stability. Symptoms in the psychosis and compulsive clusters (hallucinations, delusions, obsessions/compulsions, and hyperorality) were largely stable, persisting from visit-to-visit in more than 50% of cases. Symptoms in the affective and disinhibited cluster were associated with the highest caregiver burden, while symptoms in the obsessive cluster were associated with the most functional impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPS in bvFTD are frequent and cluster into four discrete groups. The fluctuating nature of some NPS in bvFTD suggests that they may not be reliable markers of disease progression or stage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13810\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:认知和行为现象定义了行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD),但核心标准之外的神经精神症状(NPS)在整个疾病中都很常见。确定NPS如何在bvFTD中聚集可能指导未来治疗的发展。方法:有散发性和遗传性bvFTD的参与者(n = 354)被纳入ARTFL LEFFTDS纵向额颞叶变性联盟。痴呆分期分为早期(CDR®+ NACC FTLD≤1)或晚期(CDR®+ NACC FTLD≥1)。分析基线和年度随访数据,比较bvFTD各阶段的NPS。使用神经精神病学问卷和临床医生对症状的判断来记录精神状态。采用多聚类分析对NPS聚类进行描述。结果:NPS在bvFTD的早期和晚期非常普遍(≥90%)。根据因子负荷的大小确定了四种NPS集群:情感性、去抑制性、强迫性和精神病。神经精神症状在就诊期间有所波动。在情感集群中,抑郁症表现出最少的访问-访问稳定性。在去抑制的集群中,兴高采烈表现出最不稳定。精神病和强迫丛集的症状(幻觉、妄想、强迫/强迫和精神亢进)在很大程度上是稳定的,在超过50%的病例中,每次就诊都持续存在。情感性和去抑制型的症状与最高的照顾者负担相关,而强迫型的症状与最严重的功能障碍相关。结论:bvFTD患者NPS发生率高,可分为四类。bvFTD中一些NPS的波动性质表明它们可能不是疾病进展或分期的可靠标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuropsychiatric symptoms cluster and fluctuate over time in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

Aim: Cognitive and behavioral phenomena define behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) outside the core criteria are common throughout the illness. Identifying how NPS cluster in bvFTD may guide development of future therapies.

Methods: Participants (n = 354) with sporadic and genetic bvFTD were enrolled in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium. Dementia stage was defined as early (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≤1) or advanced (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≥1). Baseline and annual follow-up visit data were analyzed to compare NPS across stages of bvFTD. Psychiatric states were captured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire and Clinician Judgment of Symptoms. Polychoric cluster analysis was used to describe NPS clusters.

Results: NPS were highly prevalent (≥90%) in early and late bvFTD. Four NPS clusters were identified based on magnitude of factor loadings: affective, disinhibited, compulsive, and psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms fluctuated across visits. In the affective cluster, depression showed the least visit-to-visit stability. In the disinhibited cluster, elation showed the least stability. Symptoms in the psychosis and compulsive clusters (hallucinations, delusions, obsessions/compulsions, and hyperorality) were largely stable, persisting from visit-to-visit in more than 50% of cases. Symptoms in the affective and disinhibited cluster were associated with the highest caregiver burden, while symptoms in the obsessive cluster were associated with the most functional impairment.

Conclusion: NPS in bvFTD are frequent and cluster into four discrete groups. The fluctuating nature of some NPS in bvFTD suggests that they may not be reliable markers of disease progression or stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PCN (Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences) Publication Frequency: Published 12 online issues a year by JSPN Content Categories: Review Articles Regular Articles Letters to the Editor Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by anonymous reviewers, an Editorial Board Member, and the Editor Publication Criteria: Manuscripts are accepted based on quality, originality, and significance to the readership Authors must confirm that the manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere and has been approved by each author
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信