Monil Majmundar, Chan Wan-Chi, Kunal N Patel, Vidit Majmundar, Rhythm Vasudeva, Kirk A Hance, Adam Ali, George Hajj, Axel Thors, Jinxiang Hu, Kamal Gupta
{"title":"医院衰弱风险评分(HFRS)在外周动脉疾病和终末期肾脏疾病的预后价值","authors":"Monil Majmundar, Chan Wan-Chi, Kunal N Patel, Vidit Majmundar, Rhythm Vasudeva, Kirk A Hance, Adam Ali, George Hajj, Axel Thors, Jinxiang Hu, Kamal Gupta","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251316837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are independent risk factors affecting outcomes like in-hospital mortality. The role of a frailty index in prognosticating outcomes in patients with ESKD and PAD is unknown. We aim to assess the prognostic value of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and its association with outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with PAD using data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) for the years 2015-2018. These patients were stratified into three categories of frailty risk based on their HFRS, a validated frailty assessment tool using ICD-10 codes: low (< 5), intermediate (5-10), and high risk (> 10) and based on revascularization or not. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and composite of mortality or major amputation. Secondary outcomes encompassed postdischarge mortality and composite of mortality or major amputation at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 122,649 patients with PAD and ESKD, 4118 underwent revascularization and 118,531 did not. In-hospital outcomes demonstrated a nonlinear relationship and postdischarge outcomes displayed a nearly linear relationship with HFRS, regardless of revascularization status. In both cohorts, the high-risk group was associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality/amputation (revascularization: odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% CI 3.3-6.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001; no revascularization: OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8-3.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and mortality (revascularization: OR 5.5, 95% CI 3.4-8.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001; no revascularization: OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.6-5.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ESKD and PAD, the HFRS serves as a valuable predictor of mortality and amputation irrespective of revascularization. This information can support informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"138-146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and outcomes in peripheral artery disease and end-stage kidney disease.\",\"authors\":\"Monil Majmundar, Chan Wan-Chi, Kunal N Patel, Vidit Majmundar, Rhythm Vasudeva, Kirk A Hance, Adam Ali, George Hajj, Axel Thors, Jinxiang Hu, Kamal Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1358863X251316837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are independent risk factors affecting outcomes like in-hospital mortality. The role of a frailty index in prognosticating outcomes in patients with ESKD and PAD is unknown. We aim to assess the prognostic value of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and its association with outcomes in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients with PAD using data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) for the years 2015-2018. These patients were stratified into three categories of frailty risk based on their HFRS, a validated frailty assessment tool using ICD-10 codes: low (< 5), intermediate (5-10), and high risk (> 10) and based on revascularization or not. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and composite of mortality or major amputation. Secondary outcomes encompassed postdischarge mortality and composite of mortality or major amputation at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 122,649 patients with PAD and ESKD, 4118 underwent revascularization and 118,531 did not. In-hospital outcomes demonstrated a nonlinear relationship and postdischarge outcomes displayed a nearly linear relationship with HFRS, regardless of revascularization status. In both cohorts, the high-risk group was associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality/amputation (revascularization: odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% CI 3.3-6.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001; no revascularization: OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8-3.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and mortality (revascularization: OR 5.5, 95% CI 3.4-8.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001; no revascularization: OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.6-5.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ESKD and PAD, the HFRS serves as a valuable predictor of mortality and amputation irrespective of revascularization. This information can support informed decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"138-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251316837\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251316837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)和终末期肾脏疾病(ESKD)是影响院内死亡率等结局的独立危险因素。虚弱指数在ESKD和PAD患者预后中的作用尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)的预后价值及其与这些患者预后的关系。方法:我们使用美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS) 2015-2018年的数据识别PAD患者。这些患者根据其HFRS(一种使用ICD-10代码验证的衰弱评估工具)分为三类:低(< 5)、中(5-10)和高风险(bbb10),并基于是否有血运重建。主要结局包括住院死亡率和综合死亡率或主要截肢。次要结局包括出院后死亡率和1年内死亡率或主要截肢的综合。结果:在122,649例PAD和ESKD患者中,4118例接受了血运重建术,118,531例没有。无论血运重建状况如何,住院预后与HFRS呈非线性关系,出院后预后与HFRS呈近线性关系。在两个队列中,高危组与住院死亡率/截肢的风险显著升高相关(血运重建术:优势比[OR] 4.6, 95% CI 3.3-6.2, p < 0.001;无血运重建:OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8-3.3, p < 0.001)和死亡率(血运重建:OR 5.5, 95% CI 3.4-8.7, p < 0.001;无血运重建术:OR为5.1,95% CI为4.6-5.6,p < 0.001)。结论:在ESKD和PAD患者中,无论血运重建与否,HFRS都可以作为死亡率和截肢的有价值的预测指标。这些信息可以支持明智的决策。
Prognostic value of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and outcomes in peripheral artery disease and end-stage kidney disease.
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are independent risk factors affecting outcomes like in-hospital mortality. The role of a frailty index in prognosticating outcomes in patients with ESKD and PAD is unknown. We aim to assess the prognostic value of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and its association with outcomes in these patients.
Methods: We identified patients with PAD using data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) for the years 2015-2018. These patients were stratified into three categories of frailty risk based on their HFRS, a validated frailty assessment tool using ICD-10 codes: low (< 5), intermediate (5-10), and high risk (> 10) and based on revascularization or not. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and composite of mortality or major amputation. Secondary outcomes encompassed postdischarge mortality and composite of mortality or major amputation at 1 year.
Results: Out of 122,649 patients with PAD and ESKD, 4118 underwent revascularization and 118,531 did not. In-hospital outcomes demonstrated a nonlinear relationship and postdischarge outcomes displayed a nearly linear relationship with HFRS, regardless of revascularization status. In both cohorts, the high-risk group was associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality/amputation (revascularization: odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% CI 3.3-6.2, p < 0.001; no revascularization: OR 3.1, 95% CI 2.8-3.3, p < 0.001) and mortality (revascularization: OR 5.5, 95% CI 3.4-8.7, p < 0.001; no revascularization: OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.6-5.6, p < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group.
Conclusion: In patients with ESKD and PAD, the HFRS serves as a valuable predictor of mortality and amputation irrespective of revascularization. This information can support informed decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)