分析肺癌死亡率的各种危险因素和趋势的影响。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Xiu Wu, Jinting Zhang, Yilin Yoshida
{"title":"分析肺癌死亡率的各种危险因素和趋势的影响。","authors":"Xiu Wu, Jinting Zhang, Yilin Yoshida","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92373-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of mortality in oncological classifications, yet the impact of various risk factors on lung cancer mortality (LCM) in non-smokers remains unclear. This study aims to weigh out the diverse impact of multiple risk factors on LCM rates and identify trends in LCM rates worldwide. We initially employed Random Forest Tree (RFT) and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) to identify common primary factors influencing LCM. After eliminating four common primary factors, a comparative analysis between partial and Pearson correlations was conducted to filter out significant factors in the correlations between risk factors and LCM rates across 204 countries from 2005 to 2019. The findings show that excluding the impacts of occupational exposure to arsenic, smoking, residential radon, occupational exposure to silica, occupational exposure to asbestos, high systolic blood pressure, secondhand smoke, child wasting, and alcohol use had a considerably greater impact on LCM than particular matter pollution (PM2.5). Furthermore, a Multiple Joinpoint Regression analysis identified increasing trends of LCM rates in the 142 countries (e.g., China and India); decreasing trends in 38 countries (e.g., Denmark and Norway), and stable trends in 24 countries (e.g., Sudan, Mali, and Australia). This research suggests that in addition to considering the effects of occupational exposure to arsenic, smoking, residential radon, and occupational exposure to silica on LCM rates, occupational exposure to asbestos, high systolic blood pressure, secondhand smoke, child wasting, and alcohol use should be considered in lung cancer prevention strategies, especially in countries with increasing trends of LCM rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the effects of various risk factors and trends in lung cancer mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Xiu Wu, Jinting Zhang, Yilin Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-92373-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung cancer is a leading cause of mortality in oncological classifications, yet the impact of various risk factors on lung cancer mortality (LCM) in non-smokers remains unclear. This study aims to weigh out the diverse impact of multiple risk factors on LCM rates and identify trends in LCM rates worldwide. We initially employed Random Forest Tree (RFT) and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) to identify common primary factors influencing LCM. After eliminating four common primary factors, a comparative analysis between partial and Pearson correlations was conducted to filter out significant factors in the correlations between risk factors and LCM rates across 204 countries from 2005 to 2019. The findings show that excluding the impacts of occupational exposure to arsenic, smoking, residential radon, occupational exposure to silica, occupational exposure to asbestos, high systolic blood pressure, secondhand smoke, child wasting, and alcohol use had a considerably greater impact on LCM than particular matter pollution (PM2.5). Furthermore, a Multiple Joinpoint Regression analysis identified increasing trends of LCM rates in the 142 countries (e.g., China and India); decreasing trends in 38 countries (e.g., Denmark and Norway), and stable trends in 24 countries (e.g., Sudan, Mali, and Australia). This research suggests that in addition to considering the effects of occupational exposure to arsenic, smoking, residential radon, and occupational exposure to silica on LCM rates, occupational exposure to asbestos, high systolic blood pressure, secondhand smoke, child wasting, and alcohol use should be considered in lung cancer prevention strategies, especially in countries with increasing trends of LCM rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"8719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906585/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92373-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92373-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺癌是肿瘤分类中导致死亡的主要原因,但各种危险因素对非吸烟者肺癌死亡率(LCM)的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在权衡多种风险因素对LCM发病率的不同影响,并确定全球LCM发病率的趋势。我们首先使用随机森林树(RFT)和梯度增强回归(GBR)来确定影响LCM的常见主要因素。在排除了四个常见的主要因素后,对2005年至2019年204个国家的风险因素与LCM发病率之间的相关性进行了偏相关性和Pearson相关性的比较分析,以过滤出显著因素。研究结果表明,排除职业暴露于砷、吸烟、住宅氡、职业暴露于二氧化硅、职业暴露于石棉、高收缩压、二手烟、儿童肥胖和饮酒的影响,对LCM的影响要比特定物质污染(PM2.5)大得多。此外,多连接点回归分析确定了142个国家(如中国和印度)的LCM发病率呈上升趋势;38个国家(如丹麦和挪威)呈下降趋势,24个国家(如苏丹、马里和澳大利亚)呈稳定趋势。这项研究表明,除了考虑职业暴露于砷、吸烟、住宅氡和职业暴露于二氧化硅对LCM发病率的影响外,在肺癌预防策略中还应考虑职业暴露于石棉、高收缩压、二手烟、儿童肥胖和饮酒,特别是在LCM发病率呈上升趋势的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disentangling the effects of various risk factors and trends in lung cancer mortality.

Disentangling the effects of various risk factors and trends in lung cancer mortality.

Disentangling the effects of various risk factors and trends in lung cancer mortality.

Disentangling the effects of various risk factors and trends in lung cancer mortality.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of mortality in oncological classifications, yet the impact of various risk factors on lung cancer mortality (LCM) in non-smokers remains unclear. This study aims to weigh out the diverse impact of multiple risk factors on LCM rates and identify trends in LCM rates worldwide. We initially employed Random Forest Tree (RFT) and Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) to identify common primary factors influencing LCM. After eliminating four common primary factors, a comparative analysis between partial and Pearson correlations was conducted to filter out significant factors in the correlations between risk factors and LCM rates across 204 countries from 2005 to 2019. The findings show that excluding the impacts of occupational exposure to arsenic, smoking, residential radon, occupational exposure to silica, occupational exposure to asbestos, high systolic blood pressure, secondhand smoke, child wasting, and alcohol use had a considerably greater impact on LCM than particular matter pollution (PM2.5). Furthermore, a Multiple Joinpoint Regression analysis identified increasing trends of LCM rates in the 142 countries (e.g., China and India); decreasing trends in 38 countries (e.g., Denmark and Norway), and stable trends in 24 countries (e.g., Sudan, Mali, and Australia). This research suggests that in addition to considering the effects of occupational exposure to arsenic, smoking, residential radon, and occupational exposure to silica on LCM rates, occupational exposure to asbestos, high systolic blood pressure, secondhand smoke, child wasting, and alcohol use should be considered in lung cancer prevention strategies, especially in countries with increasing trends of LCM rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信