手工肌肉测试的上肢肌力在四肢瘫痪的人接受手术恢复肘关节伸展:一个范围审查。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13348
Sabrina Koch-Borner, Ursina Arnet, Ann-Sofi Lamberg, Silvia Schibli, Jennifer Dunn
{"title":"手工肌肉测试的上肢肌力在四肢瘫痪的人接受手术恢复肘关节伸展:一个范围审查。","authors":"Sabrina Koch-Borner, Ursina Arnet, Ann-Sofi Lamberg, Silvia Schibli, Jennifer Dunn","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tetraplegia often leads to upper limb disability due to triceps paralysis, affecting workspace and mobility. Restoring elbow extension via muscle-tendon or nerve transfer requires preoperative donor muscle strength assessment and postoperative evaluation. Manual muscle testing (MMT) is common, but inconsistencies in grading systems and procedures hinder cross-study comparisons. This study aims to examine how MMT is reported for assessing shoulder and elbow muscle strength in patients with tetraplegia undergoing elbow extension restoration. The review focuses on grading systems, targeted muscles, and testing procedures and positions used in MMT to advocate for standardization. A literature survey was conducted in September 2021 and repeated in September 2023 across five databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus. The search strategy utilized subject headings and keywords related to \"upper limb reconstructive surgery,\" \"tendon transfer surgery,\" \"nerve transfer surgery,\" and \"tetraplegia.\" Studies describing clinical information about assessment or outcomes of shoulder and elbow muscle strength using MMT in surgical elbow extension restoration in tetraplegia were included. Extracted data included study characteristics, surgical intervention, muscles tested, and description of how MMT is performed. These data were then analyzed to categorize and interpret existing practices. A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 66% focused on muscle-tendon, and 34% addressed nerve transfers. Donor strength was assessed preoperatively in 55% and postoperatively in 34%. Elbow extension strength was consistently reported postoperatively but only preoperatively in 83% of studies. Only five studies specified the positions used for muscle testing, but these positions varied. Despite numerous studies on elbow extension restoration outcomes in people with tetraplegia, there is no consistent approach for reporting muscle strength. Consistent reporting of pre- and postoperative muscle strength, including testing positions, is required to obtain standardized MMT positions. Similarly, the adoption of a universal scale could improve outcome reporting and synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"850-860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manual muscle testing of upper limb muscle strength in persons with tetraplegia undergoing surgical restoration of elbow extension: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Koch-Borner, Ursina Arnet, Ann-Sofi Lamberg, Silvia Schibli, Jennifer Dunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tetraplegia often leads to upper limb disability due to triceps paralysis, affecting workspace and mobility. Restoring elbow extension via muscle-tendon or nerve transfer requires preoperative donor muscle strength assessment and postoperative evaluation. Manual muscle testing (MMT) is common, but inconsistencies in grading systems and procedures hinder cross-study comparisons. This study aims to examine how MMT is reported for assessing shoulder and elbow muscle strength in patients with tetraplegia undergoing elbow extension restoration. The review focuses on grading systems, targeted muscles, and testing procedures and positions used in MMT to advocate for standardization. A literature survey was conducted in September 2021 and repeated in September 2023 across five databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus. The search strategy utilized subject headings and keywords related to \\\"upper limb reconstructive surgery,\\\" \\\"tendon transfer surgery,\\\" \\\"nerve transfer surgery,\\\" and \\\"tetraplegia.\\\" Studies describing clinical information about assessment or outcomes of shoulder and elbow muscle strength using MMT in surgical elbow extension restoration in tetraplegia were included. Extracted data included study characteristics, surgical intervention, muscles tested, and description of how MMT is performed. These data were then analyzed to categorize and interpret existing practices. A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 66% focused on muscle-tendon, and 34% addressed nerve transfers. Donor strength was assessed preoperatively in 55% and postoperatively in 34%. Elbow extension strength was consistently reported postoperatively but only preoperatively in 83% of studies. Only five studies specified the positions used for muscle testing, but these positions varied. Despite numerous studies on elbow extension restoration outcomes in people with tetraplegia, there is no consistent approach for reporting muscle strength. Consistent reporting of pre- and postoperative muscle strength, including testing positions, is required to obtain standardized MMT positions. Similarly, the adoption of a universal scale could improve outcome reporting and synthesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"850-860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

四肢瘫痪往往导致上肢残疾,由于三头肌麻痹,影响工作和活动。通过肌肉肌腱或神经转移恢复肘关节伸展需要术前供体肌肉力量评估和术后评估。手动肌肉测试(MMT)是常见的,但分级系统和程序的不一致性阻碍了交叉研究的比较。本研究旨在探讨MMT是如何评估接受肘关节伸展修复的四肢瘫痪患者肩关节和肘关节肌肉力量的。该综述侧重于MMT中使用的分级系统、目标肌肉、测试程序和位置,以倡导标准化。文献调查于2021年9月进行,并于2023年9月在五个数据库中进行了重复调查:联合和补充医学数据库、Embase、Medline、CINAHL和Scopus。搜索策略使用了与“上肢重建手术”、“肌腱移植手术”、“神经移植手术”和“四肢瘫痪”相关的主题标题和关键词。研究描述了在四肢瘫痪患者手术肘关节伸展恢复中使用MMT评估肩关节和肘关节肌肉力量的临床信息或结果。提取的数据包括研究特征、手术干预、肌肉测试和MMT如何实施的描述。然后对这些数据进行分析,以分类和解释现有的做法。共有29项研究符合纳入标准。其中,66%专注于肌肉肌腱,34%专注于神经转移。术前评估供体强度为55%,术后评估供体强度为34%。在83%的研究中,术后均报道肘关节伸展力量,但仅在术前报道。只有五项研究指定了用于肌肉测试的体位,但这些体位各不相同。尽管有许多关于四肢瘫痪患者肘关节伸展恢复结果的研究,但没有一致的方法来报道肌肉力量。为了获得标准化的MMT位置,需要一致的术前和术后肌肉力量报告,包括测试位置。同样,采用普遍比额表可以改进结果报告和综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Manual muscle testing of upper limb muscle strength in persons with tetraplegia undergoing surgical restoration of elbow extension: A scoping review.

Tetraplegia often leads to upper limb disability due to triceps paralysis, affecting workspace and mobility. Restoring elbow extension via muscle-tendon or nerve transfer requires preoperative donor muscle strength assessment and postoperative evaluation. Manual muscle testing (MMT) is common, but inconsistencies in grading systems and procedures hinder cross-study comparisons. This study aims to examine how MMT is reported for assessing shoulder and elbow muscle strength in patients with tetraplegia undergoing elbow extension restoration. The review focuses on grading systems, targeted muscles, and testing procedures and positions used in MMT to advocate for standardization. A literature survey was conducted in September 2021 and repeated in September 2023 across five databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus. The search strategy utilized subject headings and keywords related to "upper limb reconstructive surgery," "tendon transfer surgery," "nerve transfer surgery," and "tetraplegia." Studies describing clinical information about assessment or outcomes of shoulder and elbow muscle strength using MMT in surgical elbow extension restoration in tetraplegia were included. Extracted data included study characteristics, surgical intervention, muscles tested, and description of how MMT is performed. These data were then analyzed to categorize and interpret existing practices. A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 66% focused on muscle-tendon, and 34% addressed nerve transfers. Donor strength was assessed preoperatively in 55% and postoperatively in 34%. Elbow extension strength was consistently reported postoperatively but only preoperatively in 83% of studies. Only five studies specified the positions used for muscle testing, but these positions varied. Despite numerous studies on elbow extension restoration outcomes in people with tetraplegia, there is no consistent approach for reporting muscle strength. Consistent reporting of pre- and postoperative muscle strength, including testing positions, is required to obtain standardized MMT positions. Similarly, the adoption of a universal scale could improve outcome reporting and synthesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信