为晚期癌症患者及其护理人员提供的弹性生活计划。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sherry Chesak, Lori Rhudy, Susanne M Cutshall, Konstantinos Leventakos, Cindy Tofthagen, Jay Mandrekar, Teresa A Rummans, Matthew M Clark, Shawna Ehlers, Maria I Lapid, Amit Sood, Deirdre R Pachman
{"title":"为晚期癌症患者及其护理人员提供的弹性生活计划。","authors":"Sherry Chesak, Lori Rhudy, Susanne M Cutshall, Konstantinos Leventakos, Cindy Tofthagen, Jay Mandrekar, Teresa A Rummans, Matthew M Clark, Shawna Ehlers, Maria I Lapid, Amit Sood, Deirdre R Pachman","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524002128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers experience a substantial amount of anxiety and distress. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of an 8-week, remotely delivered Resilient Living Program (RLP) for adult patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients included adults (≥18 years) with advanced cancer. Their caregiver had the option to participate. The RLP components included online modules, a print journal, and 4 video-telehealth-delivered sessions. Content focused on techniques for managing stress and building resilience (mindful presence, uplifting emotions, reframing experiences through practicing principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed quantitatively and with semi-structured interviews conducted with a subset of participants. Effectiveness measures (anxiety, stress, quality of life [QOL], sleep, resiliency, and fatigue) were administered at baseline, week 5, week 9, and week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the eligible patients, 33/72 (46%) were enrolled. In all, 15 caregivers enrolled. Thirty participants (21 patients/9 caregivers) completed at least 3 video-telehealth sessions (63% adherence). For patients, there were statistically significant improvements in anxiety and fatigue at week 12 (<i>p</i> = 0.05). Other effectiveness measures (stress, QOL, sleep, resiliency) showed positive trends. Eleven participants were interviewed and qualitative analysis revealed 4 themes: Easy to Use, Learning Key Principles, Practice is Essential, and Examples of Benefits.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Participation in the RLP was feasible and acceptable for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Participants tended to indicate that the practices were easy to integrate into their everyday lives, engendered their ability to focus on the positive, and would recommend the RLP to other individuals living with advanced cancer. Preliminary effectiveness data suggest the program may positively impact anxiety, stress, QOL, sleep, resiliency, and fatigue. A larger randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilient living program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Sherry Chesak, Lori Rhudy, Susanne M Cutshall, Konstantinos Leventakos, Cindy Tofthagen, Jay Mandrekar, Teresa A Rummans, Matthew M Clark, Shawna Ehlers, Maria I Lapid, Amit Sood, Deirdre R Pachman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1478951524002128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers experience a substantial amount of anxiety and distress. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of an 8-week, remotely delivered Resilient Living Program (RLP) for adult patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients included adults (≥18 years) with advanced cancer. Their caregiver had the option to participate. The RLP components included online modules, a print journal, and 4 video-telehealth-delivered sessions. Content focused on techniques for managing stress and building resilience (mindful presence, uplifting emotions, reframing experiences through practicing principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed quantitatively and with semi-structured interviews conducted with a subset of participants. Effectiveness measures (anxiety, stress, quality of life [QOL], sleep, resiliency, and fatigue) were administered at baseline, week 5, week 9, and week 12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the eligible patients, 33/72 (46%) were enrolled. In all, 15 caregivers enrolled. Thirty participants (21 patients/9 caregivers) completed at least 3 video-telehealth sessions (63% adherence). For patients, there were statistically significant improvements in anxiety and fatigue at week 12 (<i>p</i> = 0.05). Other effectiveness measures (stress, QOL, sleep, resiliency) showed positive trends. Eleven participants were interviewed and qualitative analysis revealed 4 themes: Easy to Use, Learning Key Principles, Practice is Essential, and Examples of Benefits.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Participation in the RLP was feasible and acceptable for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Participants tended to indicate that the practices were easy to integrate into their everyday lives, engendered their ability to focus on the positive, and would recommend the RLP to other individuals living with advanced cancer. Preliminary effectiveness data suggest the program may positively impact anxiety, stress, QOL, sleep, resiliency, and fatigue. A larger randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524002128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524002128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:晚期癌症患者和他们的照顾者经历了大量的焦虑和痛苦。本研究的目的是评估对成年晚期癌症患者及其护理人员进行为期8周的远程递送弹性生活计划(RLP)的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。方法:符合条件的患者包括成人(≥18岁)晚期癌症。他们的护理人员可以选择参与。RLP的组成部分包括在线模块、一份印刷期刊和4次视频远程保健会议。内容集中于管理压力和建立弹性的技巧(注意存在,振奋情绪,通过实践感恩原则来重新构建经验,同情,接受,意义,和宽恕)。可行性和可接受性进行了定量评估,并与一部分参与者进行了半结构化访谈。在基线、第5周、第9周和第12周进行有效性测量(焦虑、压力、生活质量[QOL]、睡眠、恢复力和疲劳)。结果:在符合条件的患者中,33/72(46%)入组。总共有15名护理人员报名。30名参与者(21名患者/9名护理人员)完成了至少3次视频远程医疗会议(63%的依从性)。患者在第12周焦虑和疲劳方面的改善有统计学意义(p = 0.05)。其他有效性指标(压力、生活质量、睡眠、恢复力)显示出积极的趋势。11名参与者接受了采访,定性分析揭示了4个主题:易于使用,学习关键原则,实践是必不可少的,以及效益的例子。结果意义:参与RLP对于晚期癌症患者及其护理人员是可行且可接受的。参与者倾向于表示,这种做法很容易融入他们的日常生活,使他们能够专注于积极的一面,并将RLP推荐给其他患有晚期癌症的人。初步的有效性数据表明,该计划可能对焦虑、压力、生活质量、睡眠、恢复力和疲劳产生积极影响。有必要进行更大规模的随机临床试验来证实这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilient living program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Objectives: Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers experience a substantial amount of anxiety and distress. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of an 8-week, remotely delivered Resilient Living Program (RLP) for adult patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Methods: Eligible patients included adults (≥18 years) with advanced cancer. Their caregiver had the option to participate. The RLP components included online modules, a print journal, and 4 video-telehealth-delivered sessions. Content focused on techniques for managing stress and building resilience (mindful presence, uplifting emotions, reframing experiences through practicing principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed quantitatively and with semi-structured interviews conducted with a subset of participants. Effectiveness measures (anxiety, stress, quality of life [QOL], sleep, resiliency, and fatigue) were administered at baseline, week 5, week 9, and week 12.

Results: Of the eligible patients, 33/72 (46%) were enrolled. In all, 15 caregivers enrolled. Thirty participants (21 patients/9 caregivers) completed at least 3 video-telehealth sessions (63% adherence). For patients, there were statistically significant improvements in anxiety and fatigue at week 12 (p = 0.05). Other effectiveness measures (stress, QOL, sleep, resiliency) showed positive trends. Eleven participants were interviewed and qualitative analysis revealed 4 themes: Easy to Use, Learning Key Principles, Practice is Essential, and Examples of Benefits.

Significance of results: Participation in the RLP was feasible and acceptable for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Participants tended to indicate that the practices were easy to integrate into their everyday lives, engendered their ability to focus on the positive, and would recommend the RLP to other individuals living with advanced cancer. Preliminary effectiveness data suggest the program may positively impact anxiety, stress, QOL, sleep, resiliency, and fatigue. A larger randomized clinical trial is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信