氧化锆冠中牙髓通路修复体的冠状微渗漏。

Q3 Medicine
General dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Kyle W Ragsdale, Richard S Adcook, Andrew J Avillo, Krystal H Burns, Marina Hernandez-Feldpausch, Jennifer C Steigerwald, Jayson H Huber, Nicholas J Hamlin, Noel E Dickens, Jeffrey J Kim
{"title":"氧化锆冠中牙髓通路修复体的冠状微渗漏。","authors":"Kyle W Ragsdale, Richard S Adcook, Andrew J Avillo, Krystal H Burns, Marina Hernandez-Feldpausch, Jennifer C Steigerwald, Jayson H Huber, Nicholas J Hamlin, Noel E Dickens, Jeffrey J Kim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate marginal sealing in endodontically treated teeth can lead to microleakage and treatment failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify and compare the quality of the marginal seal when different materials and bonding techniques were used to restore endodontic access cavities in zirconia cylinders. Fifty custom zirconia cylinders (10.0 mm in diameter × 14.0 mm in height; wall thickness of 1.5 mm) were prepared with simulated endodontic access cavities (5.0 mm in diameter). The cylindrical specimens were divided into 5 groups, each assigned a different method of access cavity restoration (n = 10 per group): direct glass ionomer cement restorations; direct composite resin restorations adhesively bonded without prior aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) particle abrasion of the zirconia surface; direct composite resin restorations adhesively bonded after Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion of the zirconia surface; custom zirconia inlays adhesively bonded without Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion of the zirconia surface or inlay; and custom zirconia inlays adhesively bonded after Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion of the zirconia surface and inlay. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution and stored in a humidified incubator at 37°C, and dye penetration was quantified with a spectrophotometer (at 450 nm) every 7 days for 28 days. Statistical analysis was conducted using 2-way analysis of variance with the Tukey test and chi-square analysis. Statistically significant differences in dye penetration were observed, with microleakage influenced by the restoration material and bonding protocol. Zirconia inlays placed after Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> abrasion exhibited the least leakage, showcasing significantly superior sealing compared with direct composite resin restorations without Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> abrasion. The results indicated that Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion is essential for secure bonding of restorations to zirconia. The results of the study confirm that glass ionomer cement should be avoided for long-term restoration of access cavities in zirconia restorations due to its inferior microleakage prevention. Instead, composite resins and zirconia are favored, with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> air abrasion showing the potential to enhance marginal seal in endodontically treated teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12571,"journal":{"name":"General dentistry","volume":"73 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronal microleakage of endodontic access restorations in zirconia crowns.\",\"authors\":\"Kyle W Ragsdale, Richard S Adcook, Andrew J Avillo, Krystal H Burns, Marina Hernandez-Feldpausch, Jennifer C Steigerwald, Jayson H Huber, Nicholas J Hamlin, Noel E Dickens, Jeffrey J Kim\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inadequate marginal sealing in endodontically treated teeth can lead to microleakage and treatment failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify and compare the quality of the marginal seal when different materials and bonding techniques were used to restore endodontic access cavities in zirconia cylinders. Fifty custom zirconia cylinders (10.0 mm in diameter × 14.0 mm in height; wall thickness of 1.5 mm) were prepared with simulated endodontic access cavities (5.0 mm in diameter). The cylindrical specimens were divided into 5 groups, each assigned a different method of access cavity restoration (n = 10 per group): direct glass ionomer cement restorations; direct composite resin restorations adhesively bonded without prior aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) particle abrasion of the zirconia surface; direct composite resin restorations adhesively bonded after Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion of the zirconia surface; custom zirconia inlays adhesively bonded without Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion of the zirconia surface or inlay; and custom zirconia inlays adhesively bonded after Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion of the zirconia surface and inlay. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution and stored in a humidified incubator at 37°C, and dye penetration was quantified with a spectrophotometer (at 450 nm) every 7 days for 28 days. Statistical analysis was conducted using 2-way analysis of variance with the Tukey test and chi-square analysis. Statistically significant differences in dye penetration were observed, with microleakage influenced by the restoration material and bonding protocol. Zirconia inlays placed after Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> abrasion exhibited the least leakage, showcasing significantly superior sealing compared with direct composite resin restorations without Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> abrasion. The results indicated that Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> particle abrasion is essential for secure bonding of restorations to zirconia. The results of the study confirm that glass ionomer cement should be avoided for long-term restoration of access cavities in zirconia restorations due to its inferior microleakage prevention. Instead, composite resins and zirconia are favored, with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> air abrasion showing the potential to enhance marginal seal in endodontically treated teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General dentistry\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"36-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙髓治疗后边缘封闭不充分会导致微渗漏和治疗失败。本体外研究的目的是量化和比较使用不同材料和粘接技术修复氧化锆圆柱根管通道腔时边缘密封的质量。50个定制的氧化锆圆柱体(直径10.0毫米×高度14.0毫米;用直径5.0 mm的模拟牙髓通道腔制备管壁厚度1.5 mm的模拟牙髓通道腔。圆柱形标本分为5组,每组采用不同的通道腔修复方法(每组n = 10):直接玻璃离子水门体修复;直接复合树脂修复体粘接,不需事先用氧化铝(Al2O3)颗粒磨损氧化锆表面;复合树脂直接修复Al2O3颗粒磨损后的氧化锆表面粘接;定制的氧化锆嵌体粘接,无Al2O3颗粒磨损氧化锆表面或嵌体;定制的氧化锆嵌体经Al2O3颗粒磨蚀后与嵌体表面粘接。标本浸泡在2%亚甲蓝溶液中,在37°C的加湿培养箱中保存,每7天用分光光度计(450 nm)定量染料渗透,共28天。统计学分析采用双向方差分析,采用Tukey检验和卡方分析。在染料渗透上观察到有统计学意义的差异,微泄漏受修复材料和连接方式的影响。经Al2O3磨损后的氧化锆嵌体泄漏最小,与未经Al2O3磨损的直接复合树脂修复体相比,具有显著的密封性。结果表明,Al2O3颗粒磨损对修复体与氧化锆的牢固结合至关重要。本研究结果证实,由于玻璃离子水门合剂的微渗漏预防能力较差,在氧化锆修复体中不宜长期使用玻璃离子水门合剂修复通道腔。相反,复合树脂和氧化锆更受青睐,Al2O3空气磨损显示出增强根管治疗牙齿边缘密封的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coronal microleakage of endodontic access restorations in zirconia crowns.

Inadequate marginal sealing in endodontically treated teeth can lead to microleakage and treatment failure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify and compare the quality of the marginal seal when different materials and bonding techniques were used to restore endodontic access cavities in zirconia cylinders. Fifty custom zirconia cylinders (10.0 mm in diameter × 14.0 mm in height; wall thickness of 1.5 mm) were prepared with simulated endodontic access cavities (5.0 mm in diameter). The cylindrical specimens were divided into 5 groups, each assigned a different method of access cavity restoration (n = 10 per group): direct glass ionomer cement restorations; direct composite resin restorations adhesively bonded without prior aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particle abrasion of the zirconia surface; direct composite resin restorations adhesively bonded after Al2O3 particle abrasion of the zirconia surface; custom zirconia inlays adhesively bonded without Al2O3 particle abrasion of the zirconia surface or inlay; and custom zirconia inlays adhesively bonded after Al2O3 particle abrasion of the zirconia surface and inlay. Specimens were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution and stored in a humidified incubator at 37°C, and dye penetration was quantified with a spectrophotometer (at 450 nm) every 7 days for 28 days. Statistical analysis was conducted using 2-way analysis of variance with the Tukey test and chi-square analysis. Statistically significant differences in dye penetration were observed, with microleakage influenced by the restoration material and bonding protocol. Zirconia inlays placed after Al2O3 abrasion exhibited the least leakage, showcasing significantly superior sealing compared with direct composite resin restorations without Al2O3 abrasion. The results indicated that Al2O3 particle abrasion is essential for secure bonding of restorations to zirconia. The results of the study confirm that glass ionomer cement should be avoided for long-term restoration of access cavities in zirconia restorations due to its inferior microleakage prevention. Instead, composite resins and zirconia are favored, with Al2O3 air abrasion showing the potential to enhance marginal seal in endodontically treated teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General dentistry
General dentistry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: General Dentistry is the premier peer-reviewed journal of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD). Published bi-monthly, General Dentistry presents research and clinical findings to support the full range of procedures that general dentists perform on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信