慢性腰痛的灾难化和恐惧回避信念:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Julio Doménech-Fernández, Aida Ezzeddine Angulo, Lourdes Peñalver-Barrios, Eva Del Rio-González, Rocio Herrero, Azucena García-Palacios, Monica Martinez-Diaz, Iago Garreta-Catalá, Máximo A Diez-Ulloa, Rosa M Baños-Rivera
{"title":"慢性腰痛的灾难化和恐惧回避信念:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Julio Doménech-Fernández, Aida Ezzeddine Angulo, Lourdes Peñalver-Barrios, Eva Del Rio-González, Rocio Herrero, Azucena García-Palacios, Monica Martinez-Diaz, Iago Garreta-Catalá, Máximo A Diez-Ulloa, Rosa M Baños-Rivera","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08419-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain continues to be a challenge in everyday rehabilitation services as improvement keeps being unpredictable.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the role of pain coping strategies, fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety and depression in pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation and Orthopedic departments in four tertiary hospitals in Spain.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Overall, 276 patients (200 women) with nonspecific low back pain according COST-B13 guidelines and lasting more than 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pain, disability, coping strategies, catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and fear-avoidance beliefs were evaluated with validated questionnaires. Predictive associations of disability and pain were analyzed by Pearson's test and by multivariate regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Catastrophizing is the pain coping strategy with the highest association with disability (r=0.52, P<0.01). Low back pain and disability showed little correlation in between (r=0.40, P<0.01). The correlation between fear-avoidance ideas and pain and disability was slight (r=0.20, P<0.01). No association was found between anxiety and depression with low back pain and disability. In the regression model, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and gender explained 35% of the variance in disability. In the subanalysis of patients with surgical indication the influence of catastrophizing was maintained. However, correlation between pain and disability is lower than in patients without surgical indication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited correlation between pain and disability suggests that pain alone cannot explain the variability of disability. Catastrophizing and kinesiophobia are predictors of the degree of disability in chronic low back pain and are cognitions potentially modifiable.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>These results support the biopsychosocial model in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain and support the use of cognitive behavioral therapy to modify maladaptive beliefs and attitudes as part of medical or surgical treatment in low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Julio Doménech-Fernández, Aida Ezzeddine Angulo, Lourdes Peñalver-Barrios, Eva Del Rio-González, Rocio Herrero, Azucena García-Palacios, Monica Martinez-Diaz, Iago Garreta-Catalá, Máximo A Diez-Ulloa, Rosa M Baños-Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08419-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain continues to be a challenge in everyday rehabilitation services as improvement keeps being unpredictable.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the role of pain coping strategies, fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety and depression in pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation and Orthopedic departments in four tertiary hospitals in Spain.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Overall, 276 patients (200 women) with nonspecific low back pain according COST-B13 guidelines and lasting more than 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pain, disability, coping strategies, catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and fear-avoidance beliefs were evaluated with validated questionnaires. Predictive associations of disability and pain were analyzed by Pearson's test and by multivariate regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Catastrophizing is the pain coping strategy with the highest association with disability (r=0.52, P<0.01). Low back pain and disability showed little correlation in between (r=0.40, P<0.01). The correlation between fear-avoidance ideas and pain and disability was slight (r=0.20, P<0.01). No association was found between anxiety and depression with low back pain and disability. In the regression model, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and gender explained 35% of the variance in disability. In the subanalysis of patients with surgical indication the influence of catastrophizing was maintained. However, correlation between pain and disability is lower than in patients without surgical indication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited correlation between pain and disability suggests that pain alone cannot explain the variability of disability. Catastrophizing and kinesiophobia are predictors of the degree of disability in chronic low back pain and are cognitions potentially modifiable.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>These results support the biopsychosocial model in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain and support the use of cognitive behavioral therapy to modify maladaptive beliefs and attitudes as part of medical or surgical treatment in low back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"305-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08419-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08419-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性腰痛在日常康复服务中仍然是一个挑战,因为改善一直是不可预测的。目的:探讨疼痛应对策略、恐惧回避信念、焦虑和抑郁在慢性腰痛患者疼痛和残疾中的作用。人群:总体上,276例患者(200名女性)根据COST-B13指南患有非特异性腰痛,持续时间超过6个月。环境:西班牙四所三级医院的康复和骨科。设计:横断面研究。方法:采用有效问卷对疼痛、残疾、应对策略、灾难化、焦虑、抑郁和恐惧回避信念进行评估。通过Pearson检验和多元回归分析残疾和疼痛的预测关联。结果:灾难化是应对疼痛的策略,与残疾的相关性最高(r=0.52, p)。结论:疼痛与残疾的相关性有限,说明疼痛本身不能解释残疾的变异性。灾难化和运动恐惧症是慢性腰痛致残程度的预测因子,并且是潜在可改变的认知。临床康复影响:这些结果支持慢性腰痛发病机制的生物心理社会模型,并支持使用认知行为疗法来改变适应不良的信念和态度,作为腰痛医学或外科治疗的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Chronic low back pain continues to be a challenge in everyday rehabilitation services as improvement keeps being unpredictable.

Aim: To evaluate the role of pain coping strategies, fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety and depression in pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Design: A cross sectional study.

Setting: Rehabilitation and Orthopedic departments in four tertiary hospitals in Spain.

Population: Overall, 276 patients (200 women) with nonspecific low back pain according COST-B13 guidelines and lasting more than 6 months.

Methods: Pain, disability, coping strategies, catastrophizing, anxiety, depression and fear-avoidance beliefs were evaluated with validated questionnaires. Predictive associations of disability and pain were analyzed by Pearson's test and by multivariate regression.

Results: Catastrophizing is the pain coping strategy with the highest association with disability (r=0.52, P<0.01). Low back pain and disability showed little correlation in between (r=0.40, P<0.01). The correlation between fear-avoidance ideas and pain and disability was slight (r=0.20, P<0.01). No association was found between anxiety and depression with low back pain and disability. In the regression model, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and gender explained 35% of the variance in disability. In the subanalysis of patients with surgical indication the influence of catastrophizing was maintained. However, correlation between pain and disability is lower than in patients without surgical indication.

Conclusions: The limited correlation between pain and disability suggests that pain alone cannot explain the variability of disability. Catastrophizing and kinesiophobia are predictors of the degree of disability in chronic low back pain and are cognitions potentially modifiable.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: These results support the biopsychosocial model in the pathogenesis of chronic low back pain and support the use of cognitive behavioral therapy to modify maladaptive beliefs and attitudes as part of medical or surgical treatment in low back pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信