行动中的公平:在质量改进中嵌入公平的范围审查和元框架。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tara A Burra, Bourne Auguste, Lisha Lo, Toluwanimi Durowaye, Haben Dawit, Susanna Fung, Christine Shea, Terri Rodak, Noor Ramji, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Brian M Wong
{"title":"行动中的公平:在质量改进中嵌入公平的范围审查和元框架。","authors":"Tara A Burra, Bourne Auguste, Lisha Lo, Toluwanimi Durowaye, Haben Dawit, Susanna Fung, Christine Shea, Terri Rodak, Noor Ramji, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Brian M Wong","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are increasing efforts to include equity in all quality improvement (QI) initiatives. A comprehensive framework to embed equity in QI has been lacking, which acts as a barrier to the QI community from taking action to reduce healthcare inequities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this scoping review were to: (1) map and summarise available equity frameworks for QI and (2) create a 'meta-framework' for QI leaders and practitioners, with engagement of people with lived experience of health inequities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles were identified with searches of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL) and review of reference lists from included articles. Articles that reported how equity can be meaningfully integrated into QI were included. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis and community member engagement and consultation were completed to clarify recommended strategies for embedding equity in QI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 2776 unique articles, with 40 meeting the inclusion criteria. A meta-framework for embedding equity in QI was created that has two enablers: broadening theoretic underpinnings and organisational culture, structures and leadership. The meta-framework also has six domains: (1) engage with people with lived experience of health inequities; (2) define the equity problem and aim; (3) diversify and train the QI team; (4) examine broader root causes; (5) intervene to reduce inequities; and (6) measure impacts on equity. The community member consultation identified key facilitators and common pitfalls in involving community members in QI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-framework is a comprehensive resource to integrate equity into all aspects of QI practice. Further study of its implementation is recommended. Revisions to QI guidelines and training curricula are also needed to drive and sustain the embedding of equity in QI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity in action: a scoping review and meta-framework for embedding equity in quality improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Tara A Burra, Bourne Auguste, Lisha Lo, Toluwanimi Durowaye, Haben Dawit, Susanna Fung, Christine Shea, Terri Rodak, Noor Ramji, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Brian M Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are increasing efforts to include equity in all quality improvement (QI) initiatives. A comprehensive framework to embed equity in QI has been lacking, which acts as a barrier to the QI community from taking action to reduce healthcare inequities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this scoping review were to: (1) map and summarise available equity frameworks for QI and (2) create a 'meta-framework' for QI leaders and practitioners, with engagement of people with lived experience of health inequities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles were identified with searches of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL) and review of reference lists from included articles. Articles that reported how equity can be meaningfully integrated into QI were included. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis and community member engagement and consultation were completed to clarify recommended strategies for embedding equity in QI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 2776 unique articles, with 40 meeting the inclusion criteria. A meta-framework for embedding equity in QI was created that has two enablers: broadening theoretic underpinnings and organisational culture, structures and leadership. The meta-framework also has six domains: (1) engage with people with lived experience of health inequities; (2) define the equity problem and aim; (3) diversify and train the QI team; (4) examine broader root causes; (5) intervene to reduce inequities; and (6) measure impacts on equity. The community member consultation identified key facilitators and common pitfalls in involving community members in QI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-framework is a comprehensive resource to integrate equity into all aspects of QI practice. Further study of its implementation is recommended. Revisions to QI guidelines and training curricula are also needed to drive and sustain the embedding of equity in QI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018335\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018335","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在所有的质量改进(QI)计划中包括公平性的努力越来越多。目前还缺乏将公平性纳入QI的全面框架,这阻碍了QI社区采取行动减少医疗保健不公平现象。目标:这一范围审查的目标是:(1)绘制和总结现有的QI公平框架;(2)为QI领导者和从业者创建一个“元框架”,让有卫生不公平生活经验的人参与其中。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、PsycInfo和CINAHL四个数据库,并查阅纳入文章的参考文献。报告如何将股权有意义地整合到QI中的文章也被纳入其中。完成了定性归纳专题分析和社区成员参与和咨询,以阐明在QI中嵌入公平的建议策略。结果:该搜索策略产生2776篇独特的文章,其中40篇符合纳入标准。在QI中嵌入公平的元框架被创建,它有两个促成因素:扩大理论基础和组织文化、结构和领导。元框架也有六个领域:(1)与有卫生不公平生活经验的人接触;(2)明确公平问题和目标;(3)多元化和培训QI团队;(4)检查更广泛的根本原因;(5)干预以减少不公平;(6)衡量对股权的影响。社区成员咨询确定了社区成员参与QI的主要促进因素和常见缺陷。结论:该元框架是将公平整合到QI实践的各个方面的综合资源。建议进一步研究其执行情况。还需要修订质量评价指南和培训课程,以推动和维持在质量评价中嵌入公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equity in action: a scoping review and meta-framework for embedding equity in quality improvement.

Background: There are increasing efforts to include equity in all quality improvement (QI) initiatives. A comprehensive framework to embed equity in QI has been lacking, which acts as a barrier to the QI community from taking action to reduce healthcare inequities.

Objectives: The objectives of this scoping review were to: (1) map and summarise available equity frameworks for QI and (2) create a 'meta-framework' for QI leaders and practitioners, with engagement of people with lived experience of health inequities.

Methods: Articles were identified with searches of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL) and review of reference lists from included articles. Articles that reported how equity can be meaningfully integrated into QI were included. A qualitative inductive thematic analysis and community member engagement and consultation were completed to clarify recommended strategies for embedding equity in QI.

Results: The search strategy yielded 2776 unique articles, with 40 meeting the inclusion criteria. A meta-framework for embedding equity in QI was created that has two enablers: broadening theoretic underpinnings and organisational culture, structures and leadership. The meta-framework also has six domains: (1) engage with people with lived experience of health inequities; (2) define the equity problem and aim; (3) diversify and train the QI team; (4) examine broader root causes; (5) intervene to reduce inequities; and (6) measure impacts on equity. The community member consultation identified key facilitators and common pitfalls in involving community members in QI.

Conclusion: This meta-framework is a comprehensive resource to integrate equity into all aspects of QI practice. Further study of its implementation is recommended. Revisions to QI guidelines and training curricula are also needed to drive and sustain the embedding of equity in QI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信