Matthew T J Halma, Sowmiyaa Kumar, Jan van Eck, Sanne Abeln, Alexander Gates, Gijs J L Wuite
{"title":"FAIR Data for Optical Tweezers Experiments.","authors":"Matthew T J Halma, Sowmiyaa Kumar, Jan van Eck, Sanne Abeln, Alexander Gates, Gijs J L Wuite","doi":"10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The single-molecule biophysics community has delivered significant impacts to our understanding of fundamental biological processes, yet the field is also siloed and has fragmented data structures which impede data sharing and limit the ability to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. To advance the field of optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics, it is important that the field adopts open and collaborative data sharing that facilitate meta-analyses that combine diverse resources and supports more advanced analyses, akin to those seen in projects like the Protein Data Bank and the 1000 Genomes Project. Here, we assess the state of data findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (the FAIR principles) within the single-molecule optical tweezers field. By combining a qualitative review with quantitative tools from bibliometrics, our analysis suggests that the field has significant room for improvement in terms of FAIR adherence. Finally, we discuss the potential of compulsory data deposition and a minimal set of metadata standards to ensure reproducibility and interoperability between systems. While implementing these measures may not be straightforward, they are key steps that will enhance the integration of optical tweezers biophysics with the broader biomedical literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":8922,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2025.03.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The single-molecule biophysics community has delivered significant impacts to our understanding of fundamental biological processes, yet the field is also siloed and has fragmented data structures which impede data sharing and limit the ability to conduct comprehensive meta-analyses. To advance the field of optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics, it is important that the field adopts open and collaborative data sharing that facilitate meta-analyses that combine diverse resources and supports more advanced analyses, akin to those seen in projects like the Protein Data Bank and the 1000 Genomes Project. Here, we assess the state of data findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (the FAIR principles) within the single-molecule optical tweezers field. By combining a qualitative review with quantitative tools from bibliometrics, our analysis suggests that the field has significant room for improvement in terms of FAIR adherence. Finally, we discuss the potential of compulsory data deposition and a minimal set of metadata standards to ensure reproducibility and interoperability between systems. While implementing these measures may not be straightforward, they are key steps that will enhance the integration of optical tweezers biophysics with the broader biomedical literature.
期刊介绍:
BJ publishes original articles, letters, and perspectives on important problems in modern biophysics. The papers should be written so as to be of interest to a broad community of biophysicists. BJ welcomes experimental studies that employ quantitative physical approaches for the study of biological systems, including or spanning scales from molecule to whole organism. Experimental studies of a purely descriptive or phenomenological nature, with no theoretical or mechanistic underpinning, are not appropriate for publication in BJ. Theoretical studies should offer new insights into the understanding ofexperimental results or suggest new experimentally testable hypotheses. Articles reporting significant methodological or technological advances, which have potential to open new areas of biophysical investigation, are also suitable for publication in BJ. Papers describing improvements in accuracy or speed of existing methods or extra detail within methods described previously are not suitable for BJ.