Nicole E-P Stark, Ethan S Henley, Brianna A Reilly, John S Nowinski, Gabrielle M Ferro, Michael L Madigan, Damon R Kuehl, Steve Rowson
{"title":"利用基于模型的图像匹配对头部撞击速度进行未校准的单摄像头视图视频追踪。","authors":"Nicole E-P Stark, Ethan S Henley, Brianna A Reilly, John S Nowinski, Gabrielle M Ferro, Michael L Madigan, Damon R Kuehl, Steve Rowson","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03705-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the accuracy of a model-based image matching (MBIM) approach with model calibration for tracking head impact speeds in uncalibrated spaces from single-camera views.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two validation datasets were used. The first included 36 videos of guided NOCSAE headform drops at varying camera positions (heights, distances, camera angles) where a speed gate measured vertical impact speed. The second dataset had eight videos of participants performing ladder falls with marked helmets, captured using a 12-camera motion capture system to track head impact speeds. Each video was tracked frame-by-frame, matching a 3D NOCSAE headform model to the head using MBIM software. Accuracy was assessed by comparing captured to MBIM-tracked speeds by the mean difference and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). A linear model assessed the influence of camera position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ideal camera views (90 degrees, height 1 or 1.4 m), MBIM-tracked vertical speeds were 0.04 ± 0.15 m/s faster than the true speed (RMSE 0.15 m/s; 2.3 ± 6.2% error). Across all 36 NOCSAE videos, MBIM-tracked vertical speeds were 0.03 ± 0.19 m/s faster (RMSE 0.19 m/s; 1.8 ± 6.9 % error). In participant videos, MBIM-tracked resultant speeds were 0.01 ± 0.33 m/s slower (RMES 0.31; 0.7 ± 9.5% error) compared to motion capture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBIM with model calibration can analyze head impact kinematics from single-camera footage without environment calibration, achieving reasonable accuracy compared to other systems. Analyzing head impact kinematics from uncalibrated single-camera footage presents significant opportunities for assessing previously untraceable videos.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncalibrated Single-Camera View Video Tracking of Head Impact Speeds Using Model-Based Image Matching.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole E-P Stark, Ethan S Henley, Brianna A Reilly, John S Nowinski, Gabrielle M Ferro, Michael L Madigan, Damon R Kuehl, Steve Rowson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-025-03705-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the accuracy of a model-based image matching (MBIM) approach with model calibration for tracking head impact speeds in uncalibrated spaces from single-camera views.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two validation datasets were used. The first included 36 videos of guided NOCSAE headform drops at varying camera positions (heights, distances, camera angles) where a speed gate measured vertical impact speed. The second dataset had eight videos of participants performing ladder falls with marked helmets, captured using a 12-camera motion capture system to track head impact speeds. Each video was tracked frame-by-frame, matching a 3D NOCSAE headform model to the head using MBIM software. Accuracy was assessed by comparing captured to MBIM-tracked speeds by the mean difference and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). A linear model assessed the influence of camera position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ideal camera views (90 degrees, height 1 or 1.4 m), MBIM-tracked vertical speeds were 0.04 ± 0.15 m/s faster than the true speed (RMSE 0.15 m/s; 2.3 ± 6.2% error). Across all 36 NOCSAE videos, MBIM-tracked vertical speeds were 0.03 ± 0.19 m/s faster (RMSE 0.19 m/s; 1.8 ± 6.9 % error). In participant videos, MBIM-tracked resultant speeds were 0.01 ± 0.33 m/s slower (RMES 0.31; 0.7 ± 9.5% error) compared to motion capture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBIM with model calibration can analyze head impact kinematics from single-camera footage without environment calibration, achieving reasonable accuracy compared to other systems. Analyzing head impact kinematics from uncalibrated single-camera footage presents significant opportunities for assessing previously untraceable videos.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03705-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03705-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究评估了一种基于模型的图像匹配(MBIM)方法的准确性,该方法具有模型校准,用于从单摄像机视图跟踪未校准空间中的头部撞击速度。方法:采用两个验证数据集。第一个测试包括36个在不同摄像机位置(高度、距离、摄像机角度)引导下的nosae头罩下降的视频,其中速度门测量垂直撞击速度。第二个数据集有8个视频,参与者戴着标记的头盔进行梯子坠落,使用12个摄像头的动作捕捉系统捕捉,以跟踪头部撞击速度。每个视频都被逐帧跟踪,使用MBIM软件将3D nosae头部模型与头部相匹配。通过平均差和均方根误差(RMSE)比较捕获的速度和mbim跟踪的速度来评估准确性。一个线性模型评估了摄像机位置的影响。结果:在理想的相机视角(90度,高度1或1.4 m)下,mbim跟踪的垂直速度比真实速度(RMSE 0.15 m/s;误差2.3±6.2%)。在所有36个NOCSAE视频中,mbimm跟踪的垂直速度快了0.03±0.19 m/s (RMSE 0.19 m/s;误差1.8±6.9%)。在参与者视频中,mbim跟踪的结果速度慢了0.01±0.33 m/s (RMES 0.31;0.7±9.5%的误差)。结论:经过模型标定的MBIM可以在没有环境标定的情况下,从单镜头镜头中分析头部撞击运动学,与其他系统相比,具有合理的精度。从未校准的单摄像机镜头中分析头部撞击运动学为评估以前无法追踪的视频提供了重要的机会。
Uncalibrated Single-Camera View Video Tracking of Head Impact Speeds Using Model-Based Image Matching.
Purpose: This study evaluates the accuracy of a model-based image matching (MBIM) approach with model calibration for tracking head impact speeds in uncalibrated spaces from single-camera views.
Methods: Two validation datasets were used. The first included 36 videos of guided NOCSAE headform drops at varying camera positions (heights, distances, camera angles) where a speed gate measured vertical impact speed. The second dataset had eight videos of participants performing ladder falls with marked helmets, captured using a 12-camera motion capture system to track head impact speeds. Each video was tracked frame-by-frame, matching a 3D NOCSAE headform model to the head using MBIM software. Accuracy was assessed by comparing captured to MBIM-tracked speeds by the mean difference and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). A linear model assessed the influence of camera position.
Results: For ideal camera views (90 degrees, height 1 or 1.4 m), MBIM-tracked vertical speeds were 0.04 ± 0.15 m/s faster than the true speed (RMSE 0.15 m/s; 2.3 ± 6.2% error). Across all 36 NOCSAE videos, MBIM-tracked vertical speeds were 0.03 ± 0.19 m/s faster (RMSE 0.19 m/s; 1.8 ± 6.9 % error). In participant videos, MBIM-tracked resultant speeds were 0.01 ± 0.33 m/s slower (RMES 0.31; 0.7 ± 9.5% error) compared to motion capture.
Conclusion: MBIM with model calibration can analyze head impact kinematics from single-camera footage without environment calibration, achieving reasonable accuracy compared to other systems. Analyzing head impact kinematics from uncalibrated single-camera footage presents significant opportunities for assessing previously untraceable videos.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.