执行功能和情景记忆在老年人动态心智理论任务表现中的作用。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Anne C Krendl
{"title":"执行功能和情景记忆在老年人动态心智理论任务表现中的作用。","authors":"Anne C Krendl","doi":"10.1080/13825585.2025.2476586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theory of mind is a core social cognitive ability, and declines over the lifespan. Prior work examining the mechanisms underlying older adults' theory of mind deficits has yielded heterogenous results. One reason for this might be a general reliance on static, rather than dynamic, stimuli. Because dynamic measures may best capture everyday theory of mind engagement, the current study examined whether executive function and/or episodic memory - the primary mechanisms examined in prior work - predicted older adults' static and dynamic theory of mind performance. In Study 1, 153 older adults completed traditional static measures of theory of mind (false belief task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes) and a dynamic theory of mind measure that captured multiple domains of theory of mind (e.g. inferring beliefs, understanding emotions). They also completed comprehensive measures of executive function and episodic memory. Episodic memory, but not executive function, predicted theory of mind performance across tasks. In Study 2, 124 different older adults completed two novel dynamic tasks, and the same cognitive measures from Study 1. The first dynamic task was similar to the Study 1, but was relatively unfamiliar. In the second task, older adults made continuous (e.g. dynamic) awkwardness ratings while watching a video. This task reduces ceiling effects, a frequent limitation of theory of mind research. Replicating the results in Study 1, episodic memory, but not executive function, predicted older adults' performance on both tasks. Together, these findings suggest that episodic memory ability predicts older adults' static and dynamic theory of mind performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7532,"journal":{"name":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the role of executive function and episodic memory in older adults' performance on dynamic theory of mind tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Anne C Krendl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13825585.2025.2476586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Theory of mind is a core social cognitive ability, and declines over the lifespan. Prior work examining the mechanisms underlying older adults' theory of mind deficits has yielded heterogenous results. One reason for this might be a general reliance on static, rather than dynamic, stimuli. Because dynamic measures may best capture everyday theory of mind engagement, the current study examined whether executive function and/or episodic memory - the primary mechanisms examined in prior work - predicted older adults' static and dynamic theory of mind performance. In Study 1, 153 older adults completed traditional static measures of theory of mind (false belief task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes) and a dynamic theory of mind measure that captured multiple domains of theory of mind (e.g. inferring beliefs, understanding emotions). They also completed comprehensive measures of executive function and episodic memory. Episodic memory, but not executive function, predicted theory of mind performance across tasks. In Study 2, 124 different older adults completed two novel dynamic tasks, and the same cognitive measures from Study 1. The first dynamic task was similar to the Study 1, but was relatively unfamiliar. In the second task, older adults made continuous (e.g. dynamic) awkwardness ratings while watching a video. This task reduces ceiling effects, a frequent limitation of theory of mind research. Replicating the results in Study 1, episodic memory, but not executive function, predicted older adults' performance on both tasks. Together, these findings suggest that episodic memory ability predicts older adults' static and dynamic theory of mind performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2025.2476586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2025.2476586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理理论是一种核心的社会认知能力,随着年龄的增长而逐渐衰退。先前研究老年人心智缺陷理论的机制已经产生了不同的结果。造成这种情况的一个原因可能是人们普遍依赖静态刺激,而不是动态刺激。由于动态测量可能最好地捕捉日常的心智理论参与,目前的研究考察了执行功能和/或情景记忆——之前研究的主要机制——是否预测了老年人的静态和动态心智理论表现。在研究1中,153名老年人完成了传统的心智理论静态测试(错误信念任务,通过眼睛读心)和动态心智理论测试,该测试捕获了心智理论的多个领域(例如,推断信念,理解情绪)。他们还完成了执行功能和情景记忆的综合测试。情景记忆,而不是执行功能,预测了跨任务的心智理论表现。在研究2中,124名不同的老年人完成了两项新的动态任务,并使用了与研究1相同的认知测量方法。第一个动态任务与研究1类似,但相对陌生。在第二个任务中,老年人在观看视频时连续(例如动态)对尴尬程度进行评分。这项任务减少了天花板效应,这是心理理论研究的一个常见限制。重复研究1的结果,情景记忆,而不是执行功能,预测了老年人在两项任务中的表现。综上所述,这些发现表明情景记忆能力可以预测老年人的静态和动态心理表现理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disentangling the role of executive function and episodic memory in older adults' performance on dynamic theory of mind tasks.

Theory of mind is a core social cognitive ability, and declines over the lifespan. Prior work examining the mechanisms underlying older adults' theory of mind deficits has yielded heterogenous results. One reason for this might be a general reliance on static, rather than dynamic, stimuli. Because dynamic measures may best capture everyday theory of mind engagement, the current study examined whether executive function and/or episodic memory - the primary mechanisms examined in prior work - predicted older adults' static and dynamic theory of mind performance. In Study 1, 153 older adults completed traditional static measures of theory of mind (false belief task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes) and a dynamic theory of mind measure that captured multiple domains of theory of mind (e.g. inferring beliefs, understanding emotions). They also completed comprehensive measures of executive function and episodic memory. Episodic memory, but not executive function, predicted theory of mind performance across tasks. In Study 2, 124 different older adults completed two novel dynamic tasks, and the same cognitive measures from Study 1. The first dynamic task was similar to the Study 1, but was relatively unfamiliar. In the second task, older adults made continuous (e.g. dynamic) awkwardness ratings while watching a video. This task reduces ceiling effects, a frequent limitation of theory of mind research. Replicating the results in Study 1, episodic memory, but not executive function, predicted older adults' performance on both tasks. Together, these findings suggest that episodic memory ability predicts older adults' static and dynamic theory of mind performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The purposes of Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition are to (a) publish research on both the normal and dysfunctional aspects of cognitive development in adulthood and aging, and (b) promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings between the fields of cognitive gerontology and neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of the journal is to publish original empirical research. Occasionally, theoretical or methodological papers, critical reviews of a content area, or theoretically relevant case studies will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信