双胎分娩:引产有影响吗?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
L Rüegg, L Vonzun, J Wawrla-Zepf, F Krähenmann, N Ochsenbein-Kölble
{"title":"双胎分娩:引产有影响吗?","authors":"L Rüegg, L Vonzun, J Wawrla-Zepf, F Krähenmann, N Ochsenbein-Kölble","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-07939-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Induction of labor as well as delivery in twin pregnancies bears specific risks. The goal of this study was to analyze the delivery mode in twin pregnancies and influence of induction on the cesarean delivery (CD) rate and perinatal outcome and to identify risk factors for CD and an intertwin interval ≥ 15 min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed the outcome of 267 twin pregnancies. Inclusion criteria for vaginal delivery in twins are gestational age (GA) > 34 weeks, leading twin in cephalic presentation, estimated weight difference ≤ 500 g and no previous uterine surgery. Women were divided into three groups: 1 = vaginal delivery, 2 = CD for both twins, 3 = emergency CD for second twin. Outcomes were mode of delivery, and influence of induction on the CD rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had 156 women (58%) in group 1, 97 (36%) in 2 and 14 (5%) in 3. Induction of labor was performed in 147 cases and led to a higher CD rate (23% vs. 47%, p < 0.001). Induction of labor and nulliparity were associated with a higher risk for CD for both twins. Risk factors for an intertwin interval of ≥ 15 min were maternal age and weight of the second twin. An intertwin interval of ≥ 15 min was associated with a lower umbilical artery pH in the second twin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of CD doubled if induction of labor was necessary. These results emphasize on careful patient counseling that includes information about the risks of deliveries in twin pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twin delivery: does induction of labor make a difference?\",\"authors\":\"L Rüegg, L Vonzun, J Wawrla-Zepf, F Krähenmann, N Ochsenbein-Kölble\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-025-07939-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Induction of labor as well as delivery in twin pregnancies bears specific risks. The goal of this study was to analyze the delivery mode in twin pregnancies and influence of induction on the cesarean delivery (CD) rate and perinatal outcome and to identify risk factors for CD and an intertwin interval ≥ 15 min.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed the outcome of 267 twin pregnancies. Inclusion criteria for vaginal delivery in twins are gestational age (GA) > 34 weeks, leading twin in cephalic presentation, estimated weight difference ≤ 500 g and no previous uterine surgery. Women were divided into three groups: 1 = vaginal delivery, 2 = CD for both twins, 3 = emergency CD for second twin. Outcomes were mode of delivery, and influence of induction on the CD rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had 156 women (58%) in group 1, 97 (36%) in 2 and 14 (5%) in 3. Induction of labor was performed in 147 cases and led to a higher CD rate (23% vs. 47%, p < 0.001). Induction of labor and nulliparity were associated with a higher risk for CD for both twins. Risk factors for an intertwin interval of ≥ 15 min were maternal age and weight of the second twin. An intertwin interval of ≥ 15 min was associated with a lower umbilical artery pH in the second twin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rate of CD doubled if induction of labor was necessary. These results emphasize on careful patient counseling that includes information about the risks of deliveries in twin pregnancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-07939-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-07939-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双胎妊娠引产和分娩具有特定的风险。本研究的目的是分析双胎妊娠的分娩方式和诱导对剖宫产率和围产儿结局的影响,并确定CD和双胎间隔≥15分钟的危险因素。方法:本单中心回顾性队列研究分析了267例双胎妊娠的结局。双胎阴道分娩的纳入标准为胎龄(GA) bb0 ~ 34周,双胎头位领先,估计体重差≤500 g,既往无子宫手术史。妇女被分为三组:1 =阴道分娩,2 =两个双胞胎的CD, 3 =第二个双胞胎的紧急CD。结果是分娩方式和诱导对CD率的影响。结果:1组156例(58%),2组97例(36%),3组14例(5%)。147例引产导致CD率升高(23% vs 47%, p)结论:引产时CD率翻倍。这些结果强调了仔细的病人咨询,包括关于双胎妊娠分娩风险的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Twin delivery: does induction of labor make a difference?

Purpose: Induction of labor as well as delivery in twin pregnancies bears specific risks. The goal of this study was to analyze the delivery mode in twin pregnancies and influence of induction on the cesarean delivery (CD) rate and perinatal outcome and to identify risk factors for CD and an intertwin interval ≥ 15 min.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed the outcome of 267 twin pregnancies. Inclusion criteria for vaginal delivery in twins are gestational age (GA) > 34 weeks, leading twin in cephalic presentation, estimated weight difference ≤ 500 g and no previous uterine surgery. Women were divided into three groups: 1 = vaginal delivery, 2 = CD for both twins, 3 = emergency CD for second twin. Outcomes were mode of delivery, and influence of induction on the CD rate.

Results: We had 156 women (58%) in group 1, 97 (36%) in 2 and 14 (5%) in 3. Induction of labor was performed in 147 cases and led to a higher CD rate (23% vs. 47%, p < 0.001). Induction of labor and nulliparity were associated with a higher risk for CD for both twins. Risk factors for an intertwin interval of ≥ 15 min were maternal age and weight of the second twin. An intertwin interval of ≥ 15 min was associated with a lower umbilical artery pH in the second twin.

Conclusion: The rate of CD doubled if induction of labor was necessary. These results emphasize on careful patient counseling that includes information about the risks of deliveries in twin pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信