未雨绸缪:对工作不安全感和主动职业行为的监管焦点视角

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Lixin Jiang, Maike E. Debus, Xiaohong Xu, Xiaowen Hu, Sergio Lopez-Bohle, Laura Petitta, Lara C. Roll, Marius Stander, Haijiang Wang
{"title":"未雨绸缪:对工作不安全感和主动职业行为的监管焦点视角","authors":"Lixin Jiang,&nbsp;Maike E. Debus,&nbsp;Xiaohong Xu,&nbsp;Xiaowen Hu,&nbsp;Sergio Lopez-Bohle,&nbsp;Laura Petitta,&nbsp;Lara C. Roll,&nbsp;Marius Stander,&nbsp;Haijiang Wang","doi":"10.1111/apps.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research has primarily focused on how employees passively react to job insecurity (e.g., withdrawal). We shift this focus by examining when and for whom job insecurity may relate to proactive career behaviors. Leveraging regulatory focus theory and the diminishing marginal utility principle, we theorize a nonlinear moderated mediation model that links job insecurity to two proactive career behaviors — networking and seeking mentorship — through avoidance work motivation and depending on collectivism orientation. Two data sets, consisting of three-wave time-lagged surveys of employees from Chile and Australia, were used to examine our hypotheses. In both samples, for those high in collectivism orientation, job insecurity increased avoidance work motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors up to a point, after which job insecurity was no longer related to these variables. For those low in collectivism orientation, regardless of the levels of job insecurity, there were no significant relations of job insecurity with avoidance motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors in the Australian sample; however, the nonsignificant relations of job insecurity with avoidance motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors turned positive in the Chilean sample. Overall, our research extends the job insecurity literature by demonstrating the conditions under which job insecurity increases proactive career behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"74 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparing for a rainy day: A regulatory focus perspective on job insecurity and proactive career behaviors\",\"authors\":\"Lixin Jiang,&nbsp;Maike E. Debus,&nbsp;Xiaohong Xu,&nbsp;Xiaowen Hu,&nbsp;Sergio Lopez-Bohle,&nbsp;Laura Petitta,&nbsp;Lara C. Roll,&nbsp;Marius Stander,&nbsp;Haijiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apps.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previous research has primarily focused on how employees passively react to job insecurity (e.g., withdrawal). We shift this focus by examining when and for whom job insecurity may relate to proactive career behaviors. Leveraging regulatory focus theory and the diminishing marginal utility principle, we theorize a nonlinear moderated mediation model that links job insecurity to two proactive career behaviors — networking and seeking mentorship — through avoidance work motivation and depending on collectivism orientation. Two data sets, consisting of three-wave time-lagged surveys of employees from Chile and Australia, were used to examine our hypotheses. In both samples, for those high in collectivism orientation, job insecurity increased avoidance work motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors up to a point, after which job insecurity was no longer related to these variables. For those low in collectivism orientation, regardless of the levels of job insecurity, there were no significant relations of job insecurity with avoidance motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors in the Australian sample; however, the nonsignificant relations of job insecurity with avoidance motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors turned positive in the Chilean sample. Overall, our research extends the job insecurity literature by demonstrating the conditions under which job insecurity increases proactive career behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"volume\":\"74 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.70004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.70004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.70004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前的研究主要集中在员工如何被动地应对工作不安全感(例如,退缩)。我们通过研究工作不安全感何时以及对谁来说可能与积极的职业行为有关来转移这一焦点。利用调节焦点理论和边际效用递减原理,通过回避工作动机和依赖集体主义取向,构建了一个非线性调节的中介模型,将工作不安全感与两种主动职业行为——建立人际关系和寻求指导联系起来。两个数据集,包括智利和澳大利亚员工的三波滞后调查,被用来检验我们的假设。在这两个样本中,对于那些集体主义倾向较高的人来说,工作不安全感在一定程度上增加了回避工作动机和随后的积极职业行为,之后工作不安全感不再与这些变量相关。对于集体主义倾向较低的澳大利亚人,无论工作不安全感水平如何,工作不安全感与回避动机和随后的主动职业行为之间没有显著的关系;然而,工作不安全感与回避动机和随后的主动职业行为的不显著关系在智利样本中转为正相关。总体而言,我们的研究扩展了工作不安全感文献,展示了工作不安全感增加主动职业行为的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preparing for a rainy day: A regulatory focus perspective on job insecurity and proactive career behaviors

Preparing for a rainy day: A regulatory focus perspective on job insecurity and proactive career behaviors

Previous research has primarily focused on how employees passively react to job insecurity (e.g., withdrawal). We shift this focus by examining when and for whom job insecurity may relate to proactive career behaviors. Leveraging regulatory focus theory and the diminishing marginal utility principle, we theorize a nonlinear moderated mediation model that links job insecurity to two proactive career behaviors — networking and seeking mentorship — through avoidance work motivation and depending on collectivism orientation. Two data sets, consisting of three-wave time-lagged surveys of employees from Chile and Australia, were used to examine our hypotheses. In both samples, for those high in collectivism orientation, job insecurity increased avoidance work motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors up to a point, after which job insecurity was no longer related to these variables. For those low in collectivism orientation, regardless of the levels of job insecurity, there were no significant relations of job insecurity with avoidance motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors in the Australian sample; however, the nonsignificant relations of job insecurity with avoidance motivation and subsequent proactive career behaviors turned positive in the Chilean sample. Overall, our research extends the job insecurity literature by demonstrating the conditions under which job insecurity increases proactive career behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信