一个分级系统的发展,以视觉评估马的运动质量

A.G. Bowen , G. Tabor , R. Labens , H. Randle
{"title":"一个分级系统的发展,以视觉评估马的运动质量","authors":"A.G. Bowen ,&nbsp;G. Tabor ,&nbsp;R. Labens ,&nbsp;H. Randle","doi":"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A series of three studies were conducted to develop an outcome measure for equine quality of movement during in-hand assessment of horses undergoing routine care, performance management or rehabilitation. In the first study, 10 expert equine physiotherapists completed a modified Delphi process to select anchor and grading words for scoring movement quality. Key features were identified and refined into directives to guide scoring. In the second study, two focus groups suggested measurement parameters and processes to improve standardisation, focusing on balancing principles of measurement with clinical practicality. The final study pilot tested the parameters, processes, and assessment forms while refining the directives, to transform the movements into a battery of 30 standardised movement tests. Each movement test has a unique directive, with the new scoring system using a paired word and numeric grade (0−5) along with comments to justify the score, linked to key features from the directive. The resultant Equine Quality of Movement Score is simple to use in the field pending reliability and validity trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a grading system for visually assessing equine quality of movement\",\"authors\":\"A.G. Bowen ,&nbsp;G. Tabor ,&nbsp;R. Labens ,&nbsp;H. Randle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A series of three studies were conducted to develop an outcome measure for equine quality of movement during in-hand assessment of horses undergoing routine care, performance management or rehabilitation. In the first study, 10 expert equine physiotherapists completed a modified Delphi process to select anchor and grading words for scoring movement quality. Key features were identified and refined into directives to guide scoring. In the second study, two focus groups suggested measurement parameters and processes to improve standardisation, focusing on balancing principles of measurement with clinical practicality. The final study pilot tested the parameters, processes, and assessment forms while refining the directives, to transform the movements into a battery of 30 standardised movement tests. Each movement test has a unique directive, with the new scoring system using a paired word and numeric grade (0−5) along with comments to justify the score, linked to key features from the directive. The resultant Equine Quality of Movement Score is simple to use in the field pending reliability and validity trials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对接受常规护理、表现管理或康复的马进行手握评估期间,进行了一系列三项研究,以开发马的运动质量的结果测量。在第一项研究中,10名马物理治疗师完成了一个改进的德尔菲过程,以选择锚定词和评分词来对运动质量进行评分。关键特性被确定并细化为指导评分的指令。在第二项研究中,两个焦点小组提出了提高标准化的测量参数和过程,重点关注测量原则与临床实用性的平衡。最后的研究试点测试了参数、过程和评估表格,同时完善了指令,将动作转化为30个标准化动作测试。每个运动测试都有一个独特的指令,新的评分系统使用配对的单词和数字等级(0 - 5)以及评论来证明分数,并与指令的关键功能相关联。由此产生的马的运动质量得分是简单的,在现场等待可靠性和有效性试验使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a grading system for visually assessing equine quality of movement
A series of three studies were conducted to develop an outcome measure for equine quality of movement during in-hand assessment of horses undergoing routine care, performance management or rehabilitation. In the first study, 10 expert equine physiotherapists completed a modified Delphi process to select anchor and grading words for scoring movement quality. Key features were identified and refined into directives to guide scoring. In the second study, two focus groups suggested measurement parameters and processes to improve standardisation, focusing on balancing principles of measurement with clinical practicality. The final study pilot tested the parameters, processes, and assessment forms while refining the directives, to transform the movements into a battery of 30 standardised movement tests. Each movement test has a unique directive, with the new scoring system using a paired word and numeric grade (0−5) along with comments to justify the score, linked to key features from the directive. The resultant Equine Quality of Movement Score is simple to use in the field pending reliability and validity trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信