绿色和能源效率政策对环境可持续性的影响:来自动态面板阈值模型的证据

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Lanouar Charfeddine , Abdul Rahman
{"title":"绿色和能源效率政策对环境可持续性的影响:来自动态面板阈值模型的证据","authors":"Lanouar Charfeddine ,&nbsp;Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the effectiveness of green and energy efficiency policies in improving environmental quality across a group of 63 countries during the period 2006–2019. To achieve this, the study first develops a set of new green and energy efficiency policy indices (including a global index and sub-indices based on financial, regulatory, and strategic energy efficiency policies) using Sarma's (2008) technique and by utilizing data from the International Energy Agency's Policies database. Second, the study examines the impact of these green and energy efficiency policies on environmental quality, analyzing different types of policies and environmental degradation indicators for lower- and upper-middle-income countries as well as higher-income countries.</div><div>Empirical results indicate that the dynamic panel threshold model outperforms the linear dynamic static panel threshold model for both groups of countries. Specifically, the findings show that exceeding certain threshold levels of green and energy efficiency policies enhances environmental quality, as demonstrated by reductions in carbon emissions, ecological footprints, and improvements in the load capacity factor. Notably, the results reveal that lower- and upper-middle-income countries have relatively lower threshold values compared to higher-income countries. This suggests that further policies in high-income countries may result in diminishing returns. However, significant “low-hanging fruit” opportunities for low- and middle-income countries were found. Several recommendations are discussed to maximize the benefits of these policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 114589"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of green and energy efficiency policies on environmental sustainability: Evidence from dynamic panel threshold model\",\"authors\":\"Lanouar Charfeddine ,&nbsp;Abdul Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the effectiveness of green and energy efficiency policies in improving environmental quality across a group of 63 countries during the period 2006–2019. To achieve this, the study first develops a set of new green and energy efficiency policy indices (including a global index and sub-indices based on financial, regulatory, and strategic energy efficiency policies) using Sarma's (2008) technique and by utilizing data from the International Energy Agency's Policies database. Second, the study examines the impact of these green and energy efficiency policies on environmental quality, analyzing different types of policies and environmental degradation indicators for lower- and upper-middle-income countries as well as higher-income countries.</div><div>Empirical results indicate that the dynamic panel threshold model outperforms the linear dynamic static panel threshold model for both groups of countries. Specifically, the findings show that exceeding certain threshold levels of green and energy efficiency policies enhances environmental quality, as demonstrated by reductions in carbon emissions, ecological footprints, and improvements in the load capacity factor. Notably, the results reveal that lower- and upper-middle-income countries have relatively lower threshold values compared to higher-income countries. This suggests that further policies in high-income countries may result in diminishing returns. However, significant “low-hanging fruit” opportunities for low- and middle-income countries were found. Several recommendations are discussed to maximize the benefits of these policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000965\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了2006-2019年期间63个国家的绿色和能源效率政策在改善环境质量方面的有效性。为了实现这一目标,本研究首先利用Sarma(2008)的技术和来自国际能源署政策数据库的数据,开发了一套新的绿色和能源效率政策指数(包括基于金融、监管和战略能源效率政策的全球指数和子指数)。其次,本研究考察了这些绿色和能源效率政策对环境质量的影响,分析了中低收入国家和高收入国家不同类型的政策和环境退化指标。实证结果表明,动态面板阈值模型对两组国家都优于线性动态静态面板阈值模型。具体而言,研究结果表明,超过绿色和能源效率政策的一定阈值水平可以提高环境质量,这可以通过碳排放、生态足迹的减少和负载能力系数的提高来证明。值得注意的是,结果显示,与高收入国家相比,低收入和中高收入国家的门槛值相对较低。这表明,高收入国家的进一步政策可能导致收益递减。然而,低收入和中等收入国家也发现了重大的“唾手可得”的机会。本文讨论了一些建议,以最大限度地发挥这些政策的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of green and energy efficiency policies on environmental sustainability: Evidence from dynamic panel threshold model
This paper investigates the effectiveness of green and energy efficiency policies in improving environmental quality across a group of 63 countries during the period 2006–2019. To achieve this, the study first develops a set of new green and energy efficiency policy indices (including a global index and sub-indices based on financial, regulatory, and strategic energy efficiency policies) using Sarma's (2008) technique and by utilizing data from the International Energy Agency's Policies database. Second, the study examines the impact of these green and energy efficiency policies on environmental quality, analyzing different types of policies and environmental degradation indicators for lower- and upper-middle-income countries as well as higher-income countries.
Empirical results indicate that the dynamic panel threshold model outperforms the linear dynamic static panel threshold model for both groups of countries. Specifically, the findings show that exceeding certain threshold levels of green and energy efficiency policies enhances environmental quality, as demonstrated by reductions in carbon emissions, ecological footprints, and improvements in the load capacity factor. Notably, the results reveal that lower- and upper-middle-income countries have relatively lower threshold values compared to higher-income countries. This suggests that further policies in high-income countries may result in diminishing returns. However, significant “low-hanging fruit” opportunities for low- and middle-income countries were found. Several recommendations are discussed to maximize the benefits of these policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信