探讨灾害应对中的沟通效率低下:应急管理人员和卫生专业人员的观点

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Reem Abbas, Todd Miller
{"title":"探讨灾害应对中的沟通效率低下:应急管理人员和卫生专业人员的观点","authors":"Reem Abbas,&nbsp;Todd Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 105393"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals\",\"authors\":\"Reem Abbas,&nbsp;Todd Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925002171\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925002171","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在灾害期间,应急管理和卫生机构通常是医疗保健服务的主要提供者,但这两个部门之间的通信中断往往会阻碍响应。本定性研究探讨了应急管理人员和卫生专业人员的经验,以确定跨机构合作中的挑战。与新西兰和联合国人道主义事务协调厅的专业人员进行了半结构化访谈。归纳性专题分析揭示了三个关键挑战:结构、操作和信息交流障碍。人际关系薄弱和缺乏事先联络阻碍了信息共享,降低了态势感知。培训不足、资金不足和依赖未经培训的人员进一步破坏了协调。僵化的规划结构、有限的社区参与以及排斥弱势群体也削弱了应对工作。过于复杂的报告结构和碎片化的信息系统限制了有效的数据共享,隐私问题进一步限制了对关键信息的获取。互操作性挑战进一步破坏了灾难响应机构之间的无缝信息流。最后,由于缺乏强有力的审计和问责机制,因此需要加强治理框架和制度化的绩效评估,以提高抗灾能力和应对效率。确定主要救灾利益攸关方之间有效沟通和信息共享的障碍,为完善应急战略提供了宝贵的见解,包括制定明确的协议、改进数据整合以及采用人工智能和数字工具来简化报告和加强决策。这些改进可以提高医疗质量,加快恢复速度,并在灾害期间更有效地分配资源,最终使受影响人群受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals
During disasters, emergency management and health agencies are typically the key providers of healthcare services, yet communication breakdowns between the two sectors often hinder response. This qualitative study explores the experiences of emergency managers and health professionals to identify challenges in cross-agency collaboration. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals from New Zealand and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Inductive thematic analysis revealed three key challenges: structural, operational, and information exchange barriers. Weak interpersonal relationships and lack of prior liaison were found to impede information sharing, reducing situational awareness. Coordination was further undermined by inadequate training, insufficient funding, and reliance on untrained personnel. Rigid planning structures, limited community engagement, and the exclusion of vulnerable groups also weakened response efforts. Overly complex reporting structures and fragmented information systems restricted effective data sharing, with privacy concerns further constraining access to critical information. Interoperability challenges further disrupt the seamless flow of information across disaster response agencies. Finally, the absence of robust auditing and accountability mechanisms highlighted the need for reinforced governance frameworks and institutionalised performance evaluations to enhance disaster resilience and response effectiveness. Identifying barriers to effective communication and information sharing among key disaster response stakeholders provides valuable insights for refining emergency response strategies including the development of clear protocols, improved data integration, and the adoption of AI and digital tools to streamline reporting and enhance decision-making. These enhancements can lead to improved quality of care, faster recovery, and more efficient resource allocation during disasters, ultimately benefiting affected populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信