焦虑症中代价高昂的回避的时间动态:患者在做出接近-回避决定时,威胁更快,奖励影响更弱

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Juliane M. Boschet-Lange , Valentina M. Glück , Roxana Pittig , Stefan Scherbaum , Andre Pittig
{"title":"焦虑症中代价高昂的回避的时间动态:患者在做出接近-回避决定时,威胁更快,奖励影响更弱","authors":"Juliane M. Boschet-Lange ,&nbsp;Valentina M. Glück ,&nbsp;Roxana Pittig ,&nbsp;Stefan Scherbaum ,&nbsp;Andre Pittig","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In anxiety disorders, approach-avoidance behavior is typically biased towards excessive, maladaptive avoidance despite costs and impairments (i.e., costly avoidance). Yet, little is known about the underlying decision dynamics that may contribute to such imbalanced behavior. The current study tested for altered temporal decision dynamics in patients with anxiety disorders compared to matched healthy controls in a task where avoiding an aversive stimulus conflicted with obtaining rewards. Participants chose repeatedly between a fixed safe/low reward and a threat/high reward option with varying threat (probability of an aversive stimulus presentation) and reward information (reward magnitude). Structured computer mouse movements required for choosing between options were tracked to capture the temporal dynamics of the decision process (i.e., when and how strongly threat and reward information influenced decision preference). The current study replicated elevated costly threat avoidance in patients with anxiety disorders compared to matched controls. Importantly, time-continuous multiple regression of mouse movements revealed altered temporal dynamics: patients showed a faster (but not stronger) impact of threat and a weaker impact of competing rewards. These findings highlight that not only biases in threat processes but also competing rewards may guide excessive avoidance and could be important treatment targets in anxiety disorders. Future research may support the external validity of these findings in real-life decisions and try to identify therapeutic strategies that allow to specifically target the attenuated impact of rewards and the accelerated impact of threat in patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 103005"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal dynamics of costly avoidance in anxiety disorders: Faster threat and weaker reward impact during approach-avoidance decisions in patients\",\"authors\":\"Juliane M. Boschet-Lange ,&nbsp;Valentina M. Glück ,&nbsp;Roxana Pittig ,&nbsp;Stefan Scherbaum ,&nbsp;Andre Pittig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In anxiety disorders, approach-avoidance behavior is typically biased towards excessive, maladaptive avoidance despite costs and impairments (i.e., costly avoidance). Yet, little is known about the underlying decision dynamics that may contribute to such imbalanced behavior. The current study tested for altered temporal decision dynamics in patients with anxiety disorders compared to matched healthy controls in a task where avoiding an aversive stimulus conflicted with obtaining rewards. Participants chose repeatedly between a fixed safe/low reward and a threat/high reward option with varying threat (probability of an aversive stimulus presentation) and reward information (reward magnitude). Structured computer mouse movements required for choosing between options were tracked to capture the temporal dynamics of the decision process (i.e., when and how strongly threat and reward information influenced decision preference). The current study replicated elevated costly threat avoidance in patients with anxiety disorders compared to matched controls. Importantly, time-continuous multiple regression of mouse movements revealed altered temporal dynamics: patients showed a faster (but not stronger) impact of threat and a weaker impact of competing rewards. These findings highlight that not only biases in threat processes but also competing rewards may guide excessive avoidance and could be important treatment targets in anxiety disorders. Future research may support the external validity of these findings in real-life decisions and try to identify therapeutic strategies that allow to specifically target the attenuated impact of rewards and the accelerated impact of threat in patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618525000416\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618525000416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在焦虑障碍中,方法回避行为通常倾向于过度的、不适应的回避,尽管有成本和损害(即,昂贵的回避)。然而,人们对可能导致这种不平衡行为的潜在决策动力学知之甚少。目前的研究测试了在避免厌恶刺激与获得奖励相冲突的任务中,焦虑障碍患者与匹配的健康对照者的时间决策动力学变化。参与者在固定的安全/低奖励和威胁/高奖励选项之间反复选择,这些选项具有不同的威胁(厌恶刺激呈现的概率)和奖励信息(奖励幅度)。在选项之间进行选择所需的结构化计算机鼠标移动被跟踪,以捕捉决策过程的时间动态(即,威胁和奖励信息何时以及如何强烈地影响决策偏好)。与对照组相比,目前的研究重复了焦虑症患者昂贵的威胁回避的升高。重要的是,小鼠运动的时间连续多元回归揭示了时间动力学的改变:患者对威胁的影响更快(但不是更强),而对竞争性奖励的影响更弱。这些发现强调,不仅威胁过程中的偏见,而且竞争性奖励也可能导致过度回避,这可能是焦虑症的重要治疗目标。未来的研究可能会支持这些发现在现实生活决策中的外部有效性,并试图确定治疗策略,以明确针对患者奖励的减弱影响和威胁的加速影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal dynamics of costly avoidance in anxiety disorders: Faster threat and weaker reward impact during approach-avoidance decisions in patients
In anxiety disorders, approach-avoidance behavior is typically biased towards excessive, maladaptive avoidance despite costs and impairments (i.e., costly avoidance). Yet, little is known about the underlying decision dynamics that may contribute to such imbalanced behavior. The current study tested for altered temporal decision dynamics in patients with anxiety disorders compared to matched healthy controls in a task where avoiding an aversive stimulus conflicted with obtaining rewards. Participants chose repeatedly between a fixed safe/low reward and a threat/high reward option with varying threat (probability of an aversive stimulus presentation) and reward information (reward magnitude). Structured computer mouse movements required for choosing between options were tracked to capture the temporal dynamics of the decision process (i.e., when and how strongly threat and reward information influenced decision preference). The current study replicated elevated costly threat avoidance in patients with anxiety disorders compared to matched controls. Importantly, time-continuous multiple regression of mouse movements revealed altered temporal dynamics: patients showed a faster (but not stronger) impact of threat and a weaker impact of competing rewards. These findings highlight that not only biases in threat processes but also competing rewards may guide excessive avoidance and could be important treatment targets in anxiety disorders. Future research may support the external validity of these findings in real-life decisions and try to identify therapeutic strategies that allow to specifically target the attenuated impact of rewards and the accelerated impact of threat in patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信