EMDR组方案与辅助专业人员实施的人道主义创伤治疗的认知行为疗法(TCC)的比较

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
Elisabetta Dozio , Cécile Bizouerne , Nicolas Lasalle , Derek Farrell
{"title":"EMDR组方案与辅助专业人员实施的人道主义创伤治疗的认知行为疗法(TCC)的比较","authors":"Elisabetta Dozio ,&nbsp;Cécile Bizouerne ,&nbsp;Nicolas Lasalle ,&nbsp;Derek Farrell","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In humanitarian crisis situations, populations are often at high risk of exposure to traumatic events and the development of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two types of trauma treatment in a humanitarian context, administered in a group setting by para-professionals. These were a trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-T) protocol and a group protocol adapted from Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), called G-TEP (Group Traumatic Episode Protocol).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted in the Central African Republic on adult men and women with symptoms of PTSD. After a psychoeducation session about the traumatic symptoms developed following traumatic episodes, they were randomly assigned to receive either CBT-T or G-TEP treatment. Participants’ PTSD symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed before and after 6 treatment sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that both protocols were effective in significantly reducing PTSD, depression and anxiety scores. No significant differences were observed between the two protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that the CBT-T and G-TEP protocols, administered by para-professionals, are both effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in people living in humanitarian crisis situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 61-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparaison de protocoles de groupe EMDR et thérapie cognitivo-comportementale (TCC) pour traiter les traumatismes en contexte humanitaire mis en place par des para-professionnels\",\"authors\":\"Elisabetta Dozio ,&nbsp;Cécile Bizouerne ,&nbsp;Nicolas Lasalle ,&nbsp;Derek Farrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2024.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In humanitarian crisis situations, populations are often at high risk of exposure to traumatic events and the development of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The main objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two types of trauma treatment in a humanitarian context, administered in a group setting by para-professionals. These were a trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-T) protocol and a group protocol adapted from Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), called G-TEP (Group Traumatic Episode Protocol).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted in the Central African Republic on adult men and women with symptoms of PTSD. After a psychoeducation session about the traumatic symptoms developed following traumatic episodes, they were randomly assigned to receive either CBT-T or G-TEP treatment. Participants’ PTSD symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed before and after 6 treatment sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that both protocols were effective in significantly reducing PTSD, depression and anxiety scores. No significant differences were observed between the two protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that the CBT-T and G-TEP protocols, administered by para-professionals, are both effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in people living in humanitarian crisis situations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 61-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176324000646\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176324000646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人道主义危机局势中,人们往往面临暴露于创伤性事件和出现创伤后应激障碍症状的高风险。本研究的主要目的是评估和比较两种类型的创伤治疗在人道主义背景下的有效性,由辅助专业人员在群体环境中进行。这是一个以创伤为重点的认知行为治疗(CBT-T)方案和一个改编自眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)的小组方案,称为G-TEP(小组创伤事件方案)。方法本研究在中非共和国对有PTSD症状的成年男性和女性进行。在对创伤发作后出现的创伤症状进行心理教育后,他们被随机分配接受CBT-T或G-TEP治疗。在6个疗程前后评估受试者的PTSD症状、焦虑和抑郁。结果两种治疗方案均能显著降低PTSD、抑郁和焦虑评分。两种方案间无显著差异。结论本研究提示,在辅助专业人员的指导下,CBT-T和G-TEP方案均能有效减轻人道主义危机情况下患者的PTSD症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparaison de protocoles de groupe EMDR et thérapie cognitivo-comportementale (TCC) pour traiter les traumatismes en contexte humanitaire mis en place par des para-professionnels

Introduction

In humanitarian crisis situations, populations are often at high risk of exposure to traumatic events and the development of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Objective

The main objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two types of trauma treatment in a humanitarian context, administered in a group setting by para-professionals. These were a trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT-T) protocol and a group protocol adapted from Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), called G-TEP (Group Traumatic Episode Protocol).

Methods

The study was conducted in the Central African Republic on adult men and women with symptoms of PTSD. After a psychoeducation session about the traumatic symptoms developed following traumatic episodes, they were randomly assigned to receive either CBT-T or G-TEP treatment. Participants’ PTSD symptoms, anxiety and depression were assessed before and after 6 treatment sessions.

Results

The results showed that both protocols were effective in significantly reducing PTSD, depression and anxiety scores. No significant differences were observed between the two protocols.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the CBT-T and G-TEP protocols, administered by para-professionals, are both effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in people living in humanitarian crisis situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信